obs 0 Posted May 18, 2005 Share Posted May 18, 2005 Isn't it nice when variance works the other way too? BTW, this was at 6-max tables (which were usually 4-6 handed). Link to post Share on other sites
Absolute 0 Posted May 18, 2005 Share Posted May 18, 2005 i hope these aren't your statsif they are, will you tell me where you play? Link to post Share on other sites
obs 0 Posted May 18, 2005 Author Share Posted May 18, 2005 I had a string of 570 really nice hands. But no, my long term stats are no where near this. Link to post Share on other sites
Absolute 0 Posted May 18, 2005 Share Posted May 18, 2005 well you might have gone on an incredible 500 hand card rush.fold a lot moreget your VP$IP below 20raise a LOT less pre-flop.stop raising so much on every street.sustainable? you'll see?get to 5K hands at least.4BB/100 is not even sustainable over a long period of time. and thats for the very best players. Link to post Share on other sites
obs 0 Posted May 18, 2005 Author Share Posted May 18, 2005 Forgot to mention, this was shorthanded. 4-6 handed usually. And yes, I know this isn't sustainable. My long terms stats are more like VPIP 23, overall AF 2.86, PFR 15%. Link to post Share on other sites
Absolute 0 Posted May 18, 2005 Share Posted May 18, 2005 Forgot to mention, this was shorthanded. 4-6 handed usually.well then!wrto can probably give you better help on your SH #sbut hes probably going to see 570 hands and close the page. Link to post Share on other sites
obs 0 Posted May 18, 2005 Author Share Posted May 18, 2005 Forgot to mention, this was shorthanded. 4-6 handed usually.well then!wrto can probably give you better help on your SH #sbut hes probably going to see 570 hands and close the page.This wasn't a serious stats post. Just an anti-bad beat post. But yes, these are pretty LAG like stats even for shorthanded. Link to post Share on other sites
akishore 0 Posted May 18, 2005 Share Posted May 18, 2005 4BB/100 is not even sustainable over a long period of time. and thats for the very best players.it is on some sites and limits.party 0.50/1, i was on 7 BB/100 after 20k hands, pacific 1/2, i was on 5 BB/100, pacific 2/4, i'm at about 3.5 BB/100, and noble poker 2/4 is between 4-6 BB/100 (not a large enough sample yet).aseem Link to post Share on other sites
KDawgCometh 2 Posted May 18, 2005 Share Posted May 18, 2005 4BB/100 is not even sustainable over a long period of time. and thats for the very best players.it is on some sites and limits.party 0.50/1, i was on 7 BB/100 after 20k hands, pacific 1/2, i was on 5 BB/100, pacific 2/4, i'm at about 3.5 BB/100, and noble poker 2/4 is between 4-6 BB/100 (not a large enough sample yet).aseemyou have to remember, 20K is barely anything really. People have been able to go through 20K downswings and 20K upswings. You'll only even get an idea of your true winrate at around 100K-200K hands Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now