Cake Rakeback Or Pokerstars Cash Bonus?

[Chavarov 0]

Hi everyone. I'm debating whether to move my roll from Pokerstars to Cake, and I could use some help.I'm 9 tabling full ring cash games ($0.10-$0.25) and will be earning 120 FPP's per hour by February (60 vpps per hour). Each FPP is worth 1.14 cents (by using the $285 cash bonus). So that's $1.37 per hour.1) Anyone know approximately how much I would be getting on Cake?and2) On another topic, what would be a decent win-rate at these stakes? I've logged about 88 hours (I don't have pokertracker yet because my POS computer can't load it), but that should be about 50K hands. I'm at 2.68 big blind profit per table per hour. That's certainly not crushing, but is it OK? What would be a good win-rate? More like 4-6 big blinds per hour?

[KoRnholio 2]

1) I don't have any numbers on hand, but 33% rakeback on cake would be much higher than that I would think. Other freebies like small field freerolls and rake races make it a no brainer. I'll send a pm in a minute about that...2) It's not bad, considering you are 9 tabling it is actually pretty good. Might want to try focusing on less tables in order to get better reads though. Also, on cake there is no pokertracker/huds, so you may not be able to multitable that many tables at once.

[Chavarov 0]

Thanks for the pm. Upon further research, it seems the fpp's (as rakeback) on pokerstars is only worth it if you're a supernova or maybe at least platinum star, sooooo I'll be making the move shortly. I prefer that they don't support pokertracker. I've never used it. It's probably a disadvantage on Stars, but there's probably not too many people using it at those stakes. But maybe I'm being naive. ps: I'll use that code too

[Javery17 0]

I guess my only worry would be if cake has enough traffic to be able to play 9 tables at a time. Either way cake rakeback is probably better.