Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Loismustdie

  1. You were so close...but 4.5 months is the longest I will allow for an argument to be continued.So by statue of limitations, you lost the argument. Haha, statute...but going to leave it so some liberal idiots can get excited.Study your law next time counselor and you'll quit wasting the BG's valuable time. Yes I will now refer to myself as The BGHey LMD!
    Hey BG. Hows the balloon biz?
  2. I'm a bit familiar with the acting circles in AZ. Who are you working with?
    Absolutely no one on any type of radar whatsoever. Well, 2 of them have done some film school/student type stuff but if you have seen it I would be surprised. They have talent, but I see myself as the jam in there jelly roll. Hopefully everyone else finds what we are doing as funny as I do. That's alot to hope for but the ones that do not find it funny wont be able to say it will be for lack of effort, the things we have come up with let it all hang out. I love what we have so far.
  3. MSNBC is far left, CNN not that much, and FOX pretty much right wing though not as far right as many people think. Of course this is just my opinion which to many people here isn't worth that much.
    I agree on this. I watch them all, check the websites daily, etc., and have found that most people I talk to who think Fox is as right wing as you can get actually don't watch it and the opinion is based solely on what they are told. These people tend to find themselves smack in that pointless/worthless column I am so fond of these days.
  4. that makes more sense. and that's fair. Most of the media is up his butt but one particularly big segment hates his guts. Fair and balanced?
    Interesting that one segment is gaining viewers and one is losing them daily. Say what you want about people in general, but for the most part if you ****ing outright lie to them all damn day eventually they will leave. If fair and balanced is willing to lie to the people, then no, Fox is not fair and balanced. At all. Thanks God.
  5. P.S. I can't help but notice that this somehow became about Sarah Palin and her kids instead of the gaping void at the top of the GOP. But I guess if you don't have an answer then distraction still works pretty well.
    Maybe, just maybe, because- for the 300th time- I don't care about the GOP. Now, 301- I don't care about the GOP. All I want is a sensible conservative voice. The 2 party system is part of the problem in my view.
  6. Some have unpaid tax liens- all now have a little sweetener where the gubment gives you 25,000 just for moving in. Yes. Detroit is bad. Yes, employment sucks- that's why you attack it all at once. Move in productive citizens, tax dollars roll in, hire a bunch of cops, put a beat-down on the riff- (locals) and clean house. I agree that these could not be rentals, that's why it's key that new blood moves in and the current failures GTFO.

  7. http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/06/17/detroit.a...omes/index.html Houses is Detroit going for 100$. Check Craigslist, there are numerous houses going for 2000.00, quite a few for 15,000.00 or less. How hard would it be to get a few companies, say like a Schwab or a Discover to, hand in hand with some of these bailout bucks, open new call centers and take volunteers within the company to move? Job is already in hand, you wouldn't have enough volunteer so it would spur hiring a bit, land values start going up, etc. It just seems like it would not be that hard to do, especially if the the Government did not run the program, you let the businesses do it, being they have a stake in making it work. Also, you are giving employees the opportunity to damn near save Detroit from having to actually build Robocop.
  8. its not a qualification. Bristol has made the decision to be a political figure. Chelsea did that a few years back and was then open to criticism. Willow has not done that and as such deserves to be left alone. You leave kids alone because you should but if they want to get out there and make themselves part of the circus they need to learn that actions have consequences.None of this even applies to the Letterman joke because it was just tasteless, unfunny, and low. However, having a legitimate discussion or making a joke about Bristol Palin and Sarah Palin's stance on teen pregnancy and sex education is fair game in my mind as they have gone out of their way to put their message out through the media and they deserve to be called on it.You act like Bristol Palin was "just in some pictures" and thats a lie. She has injected herself into a very controversial debate by her own actions (and her mom has been pleased to have her in the spotlight when she thinks it helps her). This is not "if your kid is ever on the television" they are fair game. That's crazy. But if you stump for controversial positions on hot button issues or write your own political blog.....tag you're in.You're not an idealist; you want to have your cake and eat it too.
    So,a kid gets pregnant, thinks it was a bad idea but is dealing with it, wants to tell others it's a bad idea and because she spoke out it's perfectly okay to make her the butt of who ****ed A-Rod jokes? Okay. Your POV is beyond ridiculous. If what you say makes sense than it would be perfectly okay to picket the Obamas kids school because it's a private school and there dad is against children having that choice. Big giant signs pointing them out with pictures that say "We are better than you" should be perfectly fine. The target isn't really the kids, its the parents, but thats okay because every chance he got he showed his pretty family off to the world, and now they are fair game. Beyond retarded.
  9. Absolutely not. David Letterman is a comedian. Typically when we are unable to laugh at something there's something wrong. I am disappointed that he apologized.
    How about if he would have said "Better make sure your daughter is not getting ass raped by the Yankee Stadium groundskeeper with his special splinter free wooden rake?" Of course that's not funny, disrespectful and in poor taste, as much as Letterman was. Mine was farther, but hey, its still comedy!!! Yuk, yuk, fellas. Typically there is something wrong when anything goes. Once again, I believe that anything should go, but I do not believe that it should just be ignored or universally excepted as "Meh." Use your free speech, but when yous a dick you should be called so, loudly.
  10. No, instead they dream of homosexual sex. :club:(sorry... I could not resist.)
    Been there. I think you guys are going to be surprised when I unveil in the near future what I have been working on recently. It's fairly gay. Somebody said that this thread could be a potential trap- I can see how some could see it as that, being that most christians think they are supposed to play some type of role, and thus cannot have dreams that consist of certain things, but dreams are just a conglomeration of everything and anything. Some could have meaning and some make no sense and are just gibberish. I happen to have vivid dreams about lots of things, sinful and not, and enjoy the idea that it's probably because, unlike the angry conservative role I play on this site I am actually rather vibrant, made up of all kinds of sides, desires, etc. We are all sinners at the core. My first answer was of course a joke, my dreams when I do dream of God are usually not good, because I dream of what I fear, like the end times and not being prepared. I can't tell you how many times I have dreamt that the sky opened, a trumpet sounded, the moon turned to blood, and all I can think about it "Shit, I should not be seeing this" and then I wake up. My dreams often involve people from church, when I was a 13 my mom was sent from Oregon to Arizona to help a Church of Christ that was in trouble spiritually and so we moved, and I hated it, as much as any kid could. I loved my friends, especially one, and I would have dreams where I was flying above her while she was at a playground and I would call to her and try to land so I could play with her, she would not look up, those were the worst dreaming years of my life. I was a fairly depressed 13 to 15 year old. To this day I harbor the feeling that life took a wrong turn at 13. I love where I am at now but that was pivotal, everything changed. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.
  11. when Clinton was president, the media called Chelsea ugly. It was true, but the idea that only Palin's kids have been the subject of jokes is ridiculous. The bush daughters made the news plenty of times for using fake id's and such. And as a Rush Limbaugh-lover, I am sure you were ok when Rush called then 13 year old Chelsea Clinton "The White House dog." Because Rush is not mean....he's a sweetheart when you listen to him all the time.Palin's lack of suitability to be president has nothing to do with baggage. They stem from her being an ignoramus. Try not to be so narrow-minded to think that just because the media is "mean" to her that means that all the criticisms of her are false. They aren't.What if someone said Obama wasn't really an American citizen? Or said he was a Muslim? Or an arab? Oh yeah, those things happened. Poor, poor Sarah Palin. I guess when she uses the media to try to destroy Levi or parades her kids around like show ponies to show off her values that is ok.....
    The media called Chelsea ugly. They should be better than that, period. That's not a defense. Making news for fake ID's is making news, the Palin kids have as far as we can tell done nothing to make news. Once again, not a defense. I don't agree with everything Rush says, and I certainly don't agree with calling a 13 year old girl a dog, no matter what the context. That being said, knowing how Rush speaks, I would be willing to bet the context would have to be how Chelsea was paraded around as you put it, everywhere. I would bet my favorite cats life that he did not just come out and say "That girl is a dog, ugly as ****." Of course, you are pretty smart, so I imagine you probably already know that, you just like to pretend it was said a certain way.You're defense is "Well, its been done to others so whatever" and that's just plain unacceptable, period. As far as her being an ignoramus-maybe. I'm currently developing a porno starring a middle aged Latina woman who ****s her way to the Supreme Court, currently casting, blatantly, all over the internet, Sonia Sotamayor look a likes. Should be a big hit, and I expect nothing to come of it, it's all good. This level of disrespect has to stop, but being that we have free speech I will settle for both sides condemning this type of behavior, loudly and ferociously.
  12. I'm not trying to push your buttons on this one LMD but where is the Republican voice? Who has the plan, bucks, support and charisma to bring the Republican Party together enough to put up any kind of opposition? Because I want to see it happen. I want to see Obama, Pelosi, Reid et al have someone who can credibly oppose them. I am no more for one party government when it's the Democrats than I am when it's the Republicans. I want to see a balance and right now there isn't one. So is Pawlenty or Daniels your guy? Please please don't say it's Sarah Palin. There's no way in hell that she can be a credible candidate. She's got way too much baggage.
    Why does it have to be a Republican? I could care less about party as long as the policies make sense. As far as Palin having to much baggage, that's a product of media coverage, not a product of reality. Try not to be so gullible. I'm still amazed at what has been allowed to go on when it comes to her. Obama gay rumours is one thing- what if someone shot an Obama gay porn? How long do you think before that was blasted as disrespectful? Palin was still on the campaign trail and Who's Nailin Palin? was already in the works, with little more than a wimper. Would Letterman have asked if Chelsea was getting knocked up by A-Rod if Clinton was on his show? Hell,no.
  13. When the government tried to pull shady crap during the Vietnam era, kids did not have TIVOs, Ipods and World Series of Poker to distract them. Whether it's GOP misdeeds or Democrat misdeeds, we, as a nation, are too busy with our "stuff" to go out and make ourselves heard. The general apathy in this country is disconcerting.
    Some of it is apathy, but a good portion is most people just don't understand the gravity, can't grasp it. Most people can grasp million, might know what a billion means, and by the time trillion rolls around that's just one to many illions and now you lost them. Join that with the constant onslaught of this- then this- then this- then this and people throw up hands and just say **** it, I will take care of me and mine, because the job is too big. We tried on this site, that's for sure, but take me for example- I am vocal pretty much every day in my life and the only ones that are listening are the ones that agreed already, or the ones that like to try and push my buttons. I can't begin to tell you how much the whole election process helped me to develop a healthy loathing for many of the retards that permeate my life. It feels good, it really does. Believe it or not, in the past I was actually too tolerant. That being said, I won't stop. I don't give a **** about it not being PC, or the threat of job loss,or the perception that I must be a racist, etc. I will be as loud as I can, all day everyday. Alas, I am only one.
  14. Obama +1That historic speech influenced the Iranian election. Here is Obama's comment on it.Yes, Obama is taking credit for the Iranian election results.
    This Obama fellow truly is amazing, and the press that covers him should all get prizes. I laughed out loud today when I saw Glenn Beck on TV hold up a picture of a Pulitzer and say "See this, NYTimes? This is a Pulitzer prize. You can EARN one of these by covering stories!!" I was pleased to see Bill Maher call Obama out. I don't agree with Maher on much but slowly I have seen a bit of a shift, maybe, just maybe people will start to realize what we knew all along- this dude is a huckster politician at best, arrogant and spineless all at once. What a waste of four years of history.
  15. He was commenting on your definition of faith. I agree with him that the definition you copied and pasted is not a sufficient definition of faith (see my post on this earlier). But please, personal insults are not going to help your argument. It's really important that we don't go there. If we degrade these threads to that, there will be no point in discussing anything. You have to give the benefit of the doubt that the other posters are arguing in good faith. ( Well, except Loismustdie, he's just angry. )Some of the people who I disagree with most on this forum are the same people I respect most. That makes for good discussion. You're not gaining much respect with this kind of thing.
    Naw, I'm more or less indifferent at this point. Those that will believe,will believe. Little can be done by me about it, so now I just make my point, get in an get out. Angry is so 2007.
  • Create New...