Jeff

He has the hiccups.Here's one I haven't seen yet, kinda fun. It involves four questions, but you have to answer each one before moving on. If you've seen it before, quiet! :)First question: How do you get an elephant into a fridge?He'd probably be pretty into it if you smeared it in peanut butter.

why the f u c k does it matter? you sensative girls

I think the shootout is a horrible idea. imagine all that hockey coming down to a shootout. makes it not worth it.

I actually don't see Jeff's point at all. The argument you're making, Jeff, really doesn't make sense. To be pro-choice, you HAVE to believe that a fetus doesn't constitute life. I happen to feel that way, though I am against late-term abortion in general, unless there are extenuating circumstances. Hell, I don't feel all that GOOD when I argue from the pro-choice corner... I don't think anybody should. There's a moral gray area there, and as a man (nominally, at least) I realize this REALLY isn't a situation I'm totally fit to judge. Hence part of the reason for my pro-choice standpoint.

I do see your point and do understand what you are saying. I guess that is what I am say... that the person should be protected at birth.

Quite frankly I don't know if it is an issue of when life begins for me. It is more of an issue of when a person has rights, or when the state can protect a person. I don't think this can happen while it is inside another person. Further I don't know why this is such a strong cause of the fundamentalists. Clearly I see the other side of the issue. But why does it have to be legislated? Pro Choice allows the freedom for both sides to follow their beliefs. I am on the side of more freedom.

The 2 yr. old is outside in the workd. no government has any business inside any woman's vagina. Those issues are between a woman and her gynecologist.Further, no person has the right to impose their view of morality on me and try to make it law.

I think you have made our point. Thankfully today you still have that choice. Others disagree with you. Why force your notion of morality on someone else? Let others choose what they want to do. If you are so appalled at the murder that you cannot let it stand, what about all the other wrong doings, death in the inner cities, and social injustices that are happening in the country. why put so much energy into this when that energy can be channeled for so many other positive things?

I agree that a fetus is a living human. But because it is inside another human, that "host" human has the right to do what she wants to her body.However, I do not think that that person has the right to smoke, do drugs, and anything else that would harm the baby if she intends to keep it. Because then they are harming it and still want it to live. However, if they do not intend to keep it, then they have the right to do what they want. A fine line I agree, but that is just how I feel. Not to different than saying you are pro life and pro the death penalty. Or the nut who said it was OK t

the terminology is confusing. I am pro life. Certainly I am in favor of life. I am not pro death or pro murder. But I am also pro freedom. Pro the US Constitution. Pro the fundamentals that this country was founded on.There is no way that it can be appropriate for the government to mandate what a person can do with their body. If you are against abortion for moral reasons, don't get one. But you cannot insert your fundamentalist religious beliefs into the fabric of our society to shape our laws. I will do everything in my power to stop you. I feel that I am at war with the Evangelic

I do get that point. I do not agree with any kind of fundamentalism, be it Christian, Jewish, or Muslim. Fundamentalists are not content with living their lives, they want to force their way of life onto others. At the heart of the issue I am not in favor of abortion. I am pro-choice. I do not think that abortion should be legislated. I am in support of freedom and less government. I'm not sure where life starts, I just know that until it comes out of the womb, the government can't tell me what to do.

Why can't more people figure this out?because more people are not right wing conservative fundamentalist christians who feel they have to push the word of Christ down everybody's throat to be saved. It is a privacy issue. The constitution guarantees it. The government can't tell a woman what to do with her body.I wasn't disagreeing with you, nutjob. My point is that a solution will never be reached because one group thinks life starts at conception and the other group doesn't.OK. Another way to read it is "Why can't more people figure this out that it is life thing and not a choice thing.

What a joke. OK, Karl Rove, what other lies can you tell the American people.

when the phrase ‘strict constructionist' is used and when the names of Scalia and Thomas are used as benchmarks for who would be appointed, those are code words, and nobody should mistake this, for saying that Bush would appoint people who would overturn Roe v. Wade.

Why can't more people figure this out?because more people are not right wing conservative fundamentalist christians who feel they have to push the word of Christ down everybody's throat to be saved. It is a privacy issue. The constitution guarantees it. The government can't tell a woman what to do with her body.

Las Vegas Poker Rooms Reviewshttp://www.allvegaspoker.com/index.php

Don't Let Anti-Choice Extremists Win the Fight for the Supreme Court For the first time in over a decade, there's a vacancy on the Supreme Court. Unless we act quickly and forcefully, the Bush administration will make sure it's filled by a right-wing activist bent on ending a woman's right to choose.Send a message to your U.S. senators right now urging them to block the nomination of a right wing conservative supreme court judicial nominee who will overturn Roe v. Wade

a coffinyup... guess you know them all...

fish?no

what doesthe maker not needthe buyer not use and the user not want?

you can only go upstairs once to see if it is on

I really hope you are kidding. You wanted everyone to sit here and guess and make up stupid' date=' granted funny' date=' responses? I actually didn't know the answer to YOUR question. Then there was the man who posted it in other words, and then it clicked. Sorry if this ruined your fun.[/quote'']turn on two switches at onceyes, then what?

ask the electricianno

OK, here's one. You are in a room with a panel of 3 light switches, one of which controls a light in an upstairs room of the house that you are in. the other 2 switches control nothing. You cannot see the room upstairs from your position downstairs. You can only go upstairs once to see if the light is turned on (it is presently off). How can you tell which switch controls the light?

he was a hostage. He had walked in with another man who had a gun pointed at him.