Forgot your password?
in General Poker Forum
Posted June 15, 2010
Women are not equal to men. People often confuse equal rights with equal ability. Just because we grant women equal rights (and it is right to do so) does not mean we need to pretend they are identical to men in all of their skills. They are are clearly biologically different, and therefore are better than men at some things and worse at other things -- like basketball for example. To recognize this is not sexism.In this case their is a clear cultural reason why women are not in general as good as men at poker, and potentially deeper biological reasons, although that part is debatable. It's not sexist to notice this or to somehow account for it.
Correct, your simply being observant.
Posted June 10, 2010
i fted this last week and got 3rd/brag
That was fun...I was short stack going to final table, finished second..Got lucky on some flips..That Arsenic guys is an ******* and should be banned IMO.
Posted June 4, 2010
hang on, when i say [name redacted] it doesn't come up [name redacted]
hey bagels your alive lolhi
Milked from the teat of a feral cowCereus No Limit Hold'em $0.25/$0.50 - 6 playersButton: $130.99 (Hero)SB: $132.60 BB: $41.85 UTG: $50.00 UTG+1: $50.05 CO: $51.60 Preflop: ($0.75) Hero is Button with (6 players)3 folds, Hero raises to $1.50, SB folds, BB raises to $5, Hero calls $3.50Flop: ($10.25) (2 players)BB bets $5, Hero raises to $57.50, BB calls $31.85 and is all-inTurn: ($104.60) (2 players)River: ($104.60) (2 players)BB showed , One pair, kings Hero showed , One pair, nines BB won $80.45(Rake: $3)
I wonder if I can say <name redacted>?
Posted May 29, 2010
lol, no, i meant me .it just got to the point that i knew that a fair number of regs i played against regularly were reading all of my strat posts and advice and that it was costing me pretty significantly in terms of winrate. i had to change my general style a bit and quit posting publicly to get it back. i'm pretty sure a lot of others would say the same.
Posted May 27, 2010
I don't need an assistant but I need an escort (if you know what I mean) for the whole series.PM me if interested and send me a picture
Just to let everybody know this isn't a joke post.
yea mine wasn't a joke post either. I like hookers
Posted May 26, 2010
Thanks for the response Gallo!
Posted May 25, 2010
Hand 35: You have JJ, why not just get it on the turn? He's either got something or not, so he probably won't pay you off on river if he's bluffing. He's probably not folding a 10 either.Hand 122: IDK if I like calling with A8o OOP.Hand 200: Is this standard (shoving 99 there)? Haven't played for awhile, so just wondering.Hand 322:Why not just call PF with 88? Reason I ask is because for the most part that's what you've been doing with smaller pairs than 99.Hand 587:A4o standard call there? Like I think it's ok to fold there and conserve some chips. I know he could be shoving wide.Hand 717:Why r/r on the flop? Did you think he was FOS? I mean, I know there's a couple of draws there.Hand 823: HU with AJhh. Why not just let him barrel off on the river if you think you're good or were you repping the Q?That's pretty much it. You seem to like to 3bet Yoda, huh? :PCongrats again!!
Posted May 20, 2010
don't listen to them Rose, you are playing, and play, you're best. I would of went and gone all in on that flop seeing as his call would of helped my stack to be bigger and Nutzz is a little bit of a small crazy player some and most have the times.
move to 50nl already so I can haz fish at 25, kthnx
nutzz, I think your 3bet sizing is a little meh. I'd make it ~1650 or shove
but if I put it all in pre, he folds I get no action period. were at least maybe he might of put something in on flop and I would of pushed anyways, regardless of him betting or not. I was pushing on flop. If I didn't think nutz was going to call me I would of gone all in pre flop, he has been raising my blinds every time , lol I know his game if he can push me around and get away with it he would of. As a rule I generally do not slow play Aces or Kings but knowing his play I knew he already raised me and I wanted to get max action out of him. Also I need to mix of my play once in a while and not always push with the nuts. I agree with pushing 99% of the time, but then there that 1% when you have to mix up your play. He is one player I will change my game with as he knows my a bit too well.
in Entertainment: Television, Movies & Music
Just an interesting read from Jeff Probst.http://popwatch.ew.com/2010/05/18/jeff-pro...illains-finale/
I love when people refer to themselves as a third party or as 'some guy'. Quite cute actually.
I actually knew someone who did this, he was some guy who used to play at a home game hosted by one of my friends. He said he would ask for like $5 all the time and he would make a few hundred or so during the week.
I will concede your point on the video. I do not watch extra content online. I still think Sandra is overated--- Just my opinion but you suck so I will keep you around is blah gameplay.are you really trying to make a point with the bolded statement. one idiot votes on a number system so the entire JURY did not vote based on game play. You do realize that a jury is not defined by the actions of one. Everyone hated Richard but they stated I don't agree with it but I have to respect your game play. It was like a broken record as each one cast there vote. If Richard would have been in front of this jury he would not have had to worry about tax evasion!
Playing against Nutz, I was wanting him to commit all his chips as he usually does , but it didn't happen so I was forced to push him all in. Wasn't chancing him hitting into something bigger to suck me out like quads.
I could not disagree more with this --- she did not try to take Russell out. Telling Rupert to do it was horrible. Nobody on the heroes tribe believed Rupert had any brains--- You might as well ask a plumber to wire you house. I mean Russell dominated this game but several weeks he was there for the taking. I mean every week I kept thinking there gonna get him this week. Sandra never got it done. Sandra admiited serveral times after her alliance was gone that her only remaining goal was to get Russell out. She used ridin coattails the entire game. (In challenges, alliances and jury votes) I mean she was tryin to pass the buck on her one goal, gettin rid of russell. A truly great player comes up with a plan and makes sure it happens. You do not come up with a plan and hope someone else does it for you. laughable-- This shows how lucky she was to win. She knew without the jury being petty she would not get the votes. I wish we could go back to the good old days of Richard and pornstar Brian when the jury voted based on gameplay. They were both hated but won in an appropriate landslide. I hated Russell but he would have gotten a tip of the hat from me and my vote as well---
I thought Lee and Crystal did a great job last night. Overall Lee did the best, but Crystal's Paul McCartney song was my favorite of the night.
I take it Bob won? What a luckbox. GG Bunny!!