daniel's blog entryi feel like the analyses made here by both daniel and howard lederer are incomplete.neither one of them seems to talk about either a) about the depth of the chip stacks of daniel or ted, and b ) what role daniel's comment may have had in inducing a check from ted.if daniel and ted have, let's say 40,000 in chips apiece, and daniel, after analysis of the situation, puts both dags and ted on big aces, then a call with a hand like 76 or 65 is marginal, but possible (depending on the pay structure). if they have more chips, then a call might not be a bad play at all (if dags' el
