Jump to content

aggie

Members
  • Content Count

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About aggie

  • Rank
    Poker Forum Newbie
  1. DING DING DING DING DING
  2. Everybody in the tournament had signed up thinking the event would be 10-handed. Not just you. It's unfair that some were given they're money back when they asked for a refund and some weren't. I'm almost positive that if the exact same thing happened to me i would not get my money back no matter how much i complained. I think the fact that you're Daniel Negreanu is a large part of the reason you got you're money back. There is nothing wrong with using you're influence by the way. You're a great embassador for the game and that should come with some perks. Sometimes it just seems unfair
  3. Hey, i'm glad you got you're money back. I'd rather you have the money than Harrahs. That said, I think it's unfair. If you had been there on time i'm guessing you would have played in the event despite the change. However unlikely, even if your table had been 10-handed, it was possible for you to be blinded off before you arrived. Obviously you wouldn't be entitled to a refund then. Maybe O'malley would have gotten a refund if he refused to continue but he was told the opposite. He would have to risk completely forfeiting the 2k to make that stand and he had every reason to believe he
  4. What they did last year made a lot more sense. They had 13 6-handed tables in the 2nd round and then started the 3rd round with 2 tables of 7 and 6. When 3 people were eliminated they had they're final table.I basically agree with Daniel but disagree that he should get a refund. Basically Harrahs screwed up but has no way of making the situation right after the fact. If Mike Omally didn't get a refund then why sholuld Daniel? It's pretty unfair that Harry demeitriu got a refund and O'mally didn't. It sucks when the loudest people get their way while polite/quiet guys like O'mally get the
  5. Daniel,I've been reading/watching you're blog for a long time now and although i disagree with some of what you say i think you seem like a good and interesting guy. But you're last blog was inaccurate and slightly unfair to Harrahs (I hate what harrahs has done to the WSOP by the way)First of all, there IS precedent for 6-max tables in a shootout event scheduled to be played 10-handed. The second round of last years $1500 NLHE shootout event consisted of 13 6-max tables (this was NOT a shorthanded event).Second, Harrah's decision to stick with 100 tables, while not the best solution, did ma
×
×
  • Create New...