Jaimca 0 Posted December 10, 2008 Share Posted December 10, 2008 What do you like better? What does your local casino take? Or just voice your opinion. Link to post Share on other sites
David_Nicoson 1 Posted December 10, 2008 Share Posted December 10, 2008 Rake is better, imho, because it keeps the casino motivates to deal a lot of hands. That is, it keeps our interests aligned. It turns out about the same when you're playing a full table, except rake favors tighter players and the time charge favors loose players. Plus paying to take a piss is a downer emotionally. Link to post Share on other sites
Jaimca 0 Posted December 10, 2008 Author Share Posted December 10, 2008 [paying to take a piss is a downer emotionally.]Yeah Really! Link to post Share on other sites
TheCinciKid 0 Posted December 10, 2008 Share Posted December 10, 2008 I voted for rake, but obviously it matters what limits you're playing. Link to post Share on other sites
TrueAce13 18 Posted December 10, 2008 Share Posted December 10, 2008 Yeah, I'm a fan of the rake b/c session fees forces you to pay even when you haven't play a hand in 3 f*ckin' hours! No no, I'm not bitter about any live sessions Link to post Share on other sites
Suited_Up 2 Posted December 10, 2008 Share Posted December 10, 2008 I voted for both.... because I can. Link to post Share on other sites
TB17 0 Posted December 10, 2008 Share Posted December 10, 2008 depends if you like to play hands or nit it up. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now