Jump to content

KoRnholio

Members
  • Content Count

    560
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by KoRnholio

  1. I was thinking along the same kind of lines a while ago, but with a twist.Heads up play, Player 1 has magic goggles to see the flop before it comes, and then while the flop betting is going on, he can see the future turn and river cards.Player 2 sees both his own and Player 1's hole cards. (Player 1's hand is tabled for all to see, Player 2's is just for him/her to see). Betting rounds as normal.It could create some interesting bluff situations. "What you raise me with 84s?!". Since Player 1 can only see the flop during pre-flop action maybe he knows he hits a flush, 2 pair.. But he wouldn't see the turn/river until the flop comes, so he wouldn't know if he had a likely winning hand until then.I think player 1 being able to see all 5 community cards at once is too much of an advantage. Although even with just flop, then later, turn/river knowledge, I think player 1 is in a much better spot.

  2. all you have to do is beat the PartyPoker 15/30 game for 2 1/2 BB an hour
    2.5bb/hour at a full ring game is like 5bb/100 hands. Good luck getting anything near that at any limit above 2/4. Though even 1bb/hour is still avery good wage at the upper limits.Personally I don't think I could handle playing professionally even with gerat skills. "Going to work" and losing money constantly during a downswing would break me mentally.
  3. Limit holdem swings can be like that, especially shorthanded games. You might average 3bb/100 hands, but that will be an average over many sessions that go: +100bbs, -90bbs, +120bbs, -100bbs, etc.Your swings do seem rather high though, even considering what I just said.

  4. I'm in kind of the same boat, been stuck at about 6k forever now. I've only ventured as high as 3/6 fixed limit HE though, and I still feel most comforable at full ring 2/4 where I book the largest and most consistant wins (in bb's).I've recently started to branch out into other games, playing some Stud8, 6-max LHE and more PLO. It hasn't made me any more money (pretty much break even at Stud8 and 6-max over a week) but it has changed up my routine and made things a little more interesting.

  5. Patience is a virtue..PokerStars Game #3017512710: Tournament #14705268, Hold'em No Limit - Level VII (100/200) - 2005/11/09 - 21:41:38 (ET)Table '14705268 71' Seat #2 is the buttonSeat 1: probab (10355 in chips) Seat 2: A_zathoth (4458 in chips) Seat 3: pokercracker (5110 in chips) Seat 4: Stonef4ce (20766 in chips) Seat 5: AP916 (15910 in chips) Seat 6: ihharvestor (36965 in chips) Seat 7: Ford15QB (28032 in chips) is sitting outSeat 8: CashCasino (47385 in chips) is sitting outSeat 9: JAallin (25819 in chips) probab: posts the ante 25A_zathoth: posts the ante 25pokercracker: posts the ante 25Stonef4ce: posts the ante 25AP916: posts the ante 25ihharvestor: posts the ante 25Ford15QB: posts the ante 25CashCasino: posts the ante 25JAallin: posts the ante 25pokercracker: posts small blind 100Stonef4ce: posts big blind 200*** HOLE CARDS ***Dealt to Stonef4ce [3h 4s]CashCasino is connected CashCasino has returnedAP916: folds ihharvestor: folds Ford15QB: folds CashCasino: folds JAallin: calls 200probab: calls 200A_zathoth: folds pokercracker: calls 100Ford15QB has returnedStonef4ce: checks *** FLOP *** [2c 5c 6s]pokercracker: checks Stonef4ce: checks JAallin: checks probab: checks *** TURN *** [2c 5c 6s] [9s]pokercracker: bets 400Stonef4ce: raises 600 to 1000JAallin: folds probab: raises 9130 to 10130 and is all-inpokercracker: folds Stonef4ce: calls 9130*** RIVER *** [2c 5c 6s 9s] [3s]*** SHOW DOWN ***Stonef4ce: shows [3h 4s] (a straight, Deuce to Six)probab: shows [9c As] (a pair of Nines)Stonef4ce collected 21685 from pot*** SUMMARY ***Total pot 21685 | Rake 0 Board [2c 5c 6s 9s 3s]Seat 1: probab showed [9c As] and lost with a pair of NinesSeat 2: A_zathoth (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)Seat 3: pokercracker (small blind) folded on the TurnSeat 4: Stonef4ce (big blind) showed [3h 4s] and won (21685) with a straight, Deuce to SixSeat 5: AP916 folded before Flop (didn't bet)Seat 6: ihharvestor folded before Flop (didn't bet)Seat 7: Ford15QB folded before Flop (didn't bet)Seat 8: CashCasino folded before Flop (didn't bet)Seat 9: JAallin folded on the Turn

  6. I really don't see much benefit to checking in the dark. I read somewhere about this one guy (non-professional) who hated playing out of position against a pro, so he'd always check in the dark when first to act heads up.Betting in the dark I could see as beneficial. In the 2003 WSOP there was a moment where a guy in the SB had KQ and it was folded around to him. He decided to just complete the blind and see what the BB would do. When the BB checked, he decided to bet 2/3 of the pot in the dark.If you're the BB in that spot, you see that the guy declined to bet before the flop and now is going to bet the flop no matter what. I'd say that makes it much harder to continue without hitting a flop given that it's likely he limped with a good/monster hand hoping to get reraised preflop.

  7. In a NL cash game I haven't, but I could see times when I would. When a guy with a pre-flop raise % under 5 reraises after you/others have shown strength and the stacks are deep, it's not a bad idea to fold it.In a tournament I wouldn't ever lay them down unless it was an early level (very deep stacks) in a large buyin event. Against random donkies in online MTTs, I'd never lay down kings, even if there were 2 all ins before me on the first hand.

  8. Why choose limit over NL? Easy...Limit offers far more opportunities for the fish to make mistakes against you, especially post-flop (where most of the money is made). And on those hands where a fish gets a lucky turned straight/set or an ugly flopped 2 pair, you loose the minimum (extra 1-2 bets) instead of a large portion of your stack.In NL, even the fish can camp for hands then go all in hoping for a caller when they hit something. It's been said by a number of pros that the ability to go all in (though usually in a tournament context) reduces the handicap that poor players have against good ones. See also Sklansky's all in system (in an old card player article but also in his tournament poker book).

×
×
  • Create New...