Seattleallstar 0 Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 i figure the couple he talked about was TJ cloutier?the wsop bracelet person was Jennifer TIlly and Laakand the well respected gaming guy was David Sklansky?his partner russ G? Link to post Share on other sites
keith crime 8 Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 I read his last book which was cool - skimmed through this one and couldn't find any proof or evidence that the tilly bracelet was bogus - did I miss something?The peeker chapter was interesting Link to post Share on other sites
XXEddie 0 Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 why do you make like 10 posts the first 18 months you were on this thread and then all the sudden start making 63 threads Link to post Share on other sites
Kid DynOmite 0 Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 So he argues that the high stakes poker that dn and others played in was merely to attract attention for the tournaments that he's not playing in?I mean, why would he have played in the 5,000 stud tourney when he could have entered the 2,000 televised nlhe tourney then? Link to post Share on other sites
BigDMcGee 3,352 Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 because this is a book geared towards exploiting people's greatest fears about poker, online and in rl... I think there's a fuking lot of cheating that goes on in poker, way more than the honest joe even suspects of. And I don't think the some of the highest stakes player are as sqeeky clean as their image portrays (if you expect me to believe that Doyle brunson worked those roads of texas with freaking Armarillo slim, one of the biggest hustlers of all time,) and never cheated once, then, well.. you're hi. But that book offer no proof, zero, just makes alot os speculation and inuendo. Link to post Share on other sites
fiftytwo52 0 Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 why do you make like 10 posts the first 18 months you were on this thread and then all the sudden start making 63 threadsThats nothing. Over one year- 1 post Link to post Share on other sites
keith crime 8 Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 because this is a book geared towards exploiting people's greatest fears about poker, online and in rl... I think there's a fuking lot of cheating that goes on in poker, way more than the honest joe even suspects of. And I don't think the some of the highest stakes player are as sqeeky clean as their image portrays (if you expect me to believe that Doyle brunson worked those roads of texas with freaking Armarillo slim, one of the biggest hustlers of all time,) and never cheated once, then, well.. you're hi. But that book offer no proof, zero, just makes alot os speculation and inuendo.yeah I agree he didn't offer any proof - just his word that he's seen people with peeker programshis first book about how he cheated at roulette was very interestingand he tells a story about how he was offered a chance at a card marking scam for poker with a liquid you could see with glasses or something - turned out that it was a scam by the authorities who had caught someone doing it and were trying to lure others - he smelled it out and got away from itI think it was wrong of him to basically accuse Tilly of being a scam without offering any proof though Link to post Share on other sites
yergan 0 Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 Can someone explain what this is all about. Im completely lost. Link to post Share on other sites
Wandigo 1 Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 Can someone explain what this is all about. Im completely lost. Link to post Share on other sites
petemacg 0 Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 Thats nothing. Over one year- 1 postI like to lurk also Link to post Share on other sites
BigDMcGee 3,352 Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 There's a crappy book out called "Dirty Poker" I already made one thread about it in the Poker BOoks forum, with a link to his website, if you're really that curious. Link to post Share on other sites
FourFlusher 0 Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 I thought it was a fun book to read...no substance, though. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now