Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hey guys. This is a hand being discussed on another forum and most have the attitude of "you played suited connectors so now you have to go broke after hitting your hand". A lot of the comments have been fairly void of any thinking beyond the first level. You guys seem to have a more in depth analysis on average and I'm curious to hear your thoughts. Here is the bulk of the original post.I've been raising a ton from the CO and BU and generally playing pretty aggressive. Thats when this hand happened... Hand #47285287-10747 at Bangor (No Limit Hold'em) Started at 07/Nov/07 13:58:21 Janne123 is at seat 0 with $64.55. TiltTilt is at seat 1 with $50.75. willy512 is at seat 2 with $50.25. tukanin is at seat 3 with $116. HD900 is at seat 4 with $56.20. Senor Loco is at seat 5 with $68.10. The button is at seat 4. Senor Loco posts the small blind of $.25. Janne123 posts the big blind of $.50. (willy512 did not post OT, is sitting out.) Janne123: -- -- TiltTilt: -- -- tukanin: 5s 4s HD900: -- -- Senor Loco: -- -- Pre-flop: TiltTilt folds. tukanin raises to $1.75. HD900 folds. Senor Loco calls. Janne123 calls. Flop (board: 6c 8h 7d): Senor Loco checks. Janne123 checks. tukanin bets $4.25. Senor Loco raises to $8.50. Janne123 re-raises to $20. tukanin ??? Both have been playing pretty tight: Senor Loco 22/15/1.5, over 70 hands Janne123 14/4/infinity, over 70 hands They usually just let their blinds go to my raises or offered very little resistance on the flop or turn.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Janne - playing only 14% of his hands preflop, much more likely to be a set here than a str8 or 2 pair.Senor Loco - set, 2 pair, same hand, or nuts. i doubt pair+draw with an AF of only 1.5.ideal situation would be for both of them to have 2 pair/set because they'd be blocking each other.this is probably our ideal scenario if all 3 of us go all in: equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 37.589% 30.77% 06.82% 115038 25486.50 { 5s4s }Hand 1: 28.917% 27.98% 00.94% 104594 3508.50 { 88-66 }Hand 2: 33.494% 26.67% 06.82% 99715 25500.00 { 88-66, T9s, 86s+, 76s, 54s, T9o, 86o+, 76o, 54o }this is probably our worst case scenario: (included T9 in Janne's range) equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 12.379% 09.97% 02.41% 115038 27820.50 { 5s4s }Hand 1: 60.463% 54.45% 06.01% 628408 69355.50 { 88-66, T9s, T9o }Hand 2: 27.158% 19.24% 07.92% 222065 91347.00 { 88-66, T9s, 86s+, 76s, 54s, T9o, 86o+, 76o, 54o }even if Janne decided to get over-agg with two pair, giving him the same hand range as Senor Loco:Hand 0: 25.888% 16.78% 09.11% 416328 226075.00 { 5s4s }Hand 1: 37.108% 28.95% 08.16% 718292 202526.50 { 66, T9s, 86s+, 76s, 54s, T9o, 86o+, 76o, 54o }Hand 2: 37.004% 29.43% 07.57% 730357 187865.50 { 88-66, T9s, 86s+, 76s, 54s, T9o, 86o+, 76o, 54o }if Senor Loco folds to our shove and Janne has a wide range: equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 51.019% 41.82% 09.20% 22770 5010.00 { 5s4s }Hand 1: 48.981% 39.78% 09.20% 21660 5010.00 { 66, T9s, 86s+, 76s, 54s, T9o, 86o+, 76o, 54o }if Senor Loco folds to our shove and Janne has only sets, we're a 60-40 favorite.if Senor Loco folds to our shove and Janne has sets or the nuts, we're a 25-75 dog.In summary, a lot of things have to go right for us to be a favorite, and even then, not by much. Certainly not enough to go after the dead $ in the pot (that we've only invested $6 in so far) when one of the villains has pretty much said he's stacking off here. Fold.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I still say shove Money :)Careful with this hand... it causes explosive arguments.Basically the question is, do we play what is essentially the second nuts against 2 sleeping mummies who both have check-raised?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...