Ti54

I've played ~2700 matches at limits ranging from $20 to $500, with most at the $100 level (all on pstars) and have an overall winning percentage of 66.99%. Oddly enough, my winning percentage increases as the buy-in does, but my guess is that this is a factor of my gaining experience as I moved up the ladder, coupled with more randomness at the lower limits with looser players.

http://www.fullcontactpoker.com/poker-foru...pic.php?t=28122 Yeah I did spend at least 10 minutes on that, way too much time.Then again...Spademan - 1016 posts....

Not a fake.

Either my post isn't written in simple enough terms or you're not very bright.

Nope, nope and nope.Also I bet you're no prize yourself either big guy. If you think someone is annoying that's fine but you're a complete slag for writing this post. In fact your namesake is probably the least attractive person in poker, man or woman.Ti54 must have aspergers syndrome b/c he can't see your point.I can see his point and in fact somewhat agree with it, but in the first place it is frivolous and not worth the time it takes to type it out, and also he puts in the dig against her physical attractiveness while praising others who are very mediocre. Its just nonsense all around.

More cushion for the pushin'?

I don't think he is pretending to be hellmuth lol, just chose that name.Hellmuth would never praise anyone (Giang) even while insulting someone else.

Nope, nope and nope.Also I bet you're no prize yourself either big guy. If you think someone is annoying that's fine but you're a complete slag for writing this post. In fact your namesake is probably the least attractive person in poker, man or woman.

sarcasm? not quite sure. But if I were with you in person I would be able to tell but these people couldn't. That's the point. How could they be good at live poker?No one else except for top poker players are ever able to detect sarcasm. Common known fact! Surprised you didn't know that. (Were you able to detect it there?)You are an idiot. My point is not that I am so special in being able to detect sarcasm, but that if I couldn't then I probably couldn't be good at poker.

This is where I stopped reading, I couldn't sit at the dogs playing poker game (the painting), and have a 90% win rate.You could at this game. Unless you suck at poker, which you might.Actually I just checked my records, from November '04 to August '05 I played 73 freezeouts against them and won 61 so 83.5%.

That picture is not a fake its all over the internet.

sarcasm? not quite sure. But if I were with you in person I would be able to tell but these people couldn't. That's the point. How could they be good at live poker?

Congrats!

careface

I made a spreadsheet to keep track of all different types of games, limits, etc. and all kinds of different ways of calculating profits. Took me about 10 hours. It involves 9 different sheets. Some of the formulas are five full lines of text. But I never use it now.