Marchione 0 Posted July 17, 2008 Share Posted July 17, 2008 PokerStars Game #18872791392: 7 Card Stud Limit ($10/$20) - 2008/07/16 - 20:28:08 (ET)Table 'Umtata II' 8-maxSeat 2: CestSiBon ($553.50 in chips) Seat 3: pokeroldmanl ($290 in chips) Seat 4: LFISGD2ME ($130 in chips) Seat 5: Walking dude ($300 in chips) Seat 6: Intrepid ($461 in chips) Seat 7: samajars ($609 in chips) Seat 8: queenofhart ($540 in chips) CestSiBon: posts the ante $1pokeroldmanl: posts the ante $1LFISGD2ME: posts the ante $1Walking dude: posts the ante $1Intrepid: posts the ante $1samajars: posts the ante $1queenofhart: posts the ante $1*** 3rd STREET ***Dealt to CestSiBon [Tc]Dealt to pokeroldmanl [6c]Dealt to LFISGD2ME [Ah Jh 9h]Dealt to Walking dude [9s]Dealt to Intrepid [Js]Dealt to samajars [7d]Dealt to queenofhart [4c]queenofhart: brings in for $3CestSiBon: calls $3pokeroldmanl: folds LFISGD2ME: raises $7 to $10Walking dude: calls $10changho joins the table at seat #1 Intrepid: raises $10 to $20samajars: folds changho is sitting outqueenofhart: folds CestSiBon: folds LFISGD2ME: raises $10 to $30Walking dude: folds Intrepid: calls $10*** 4th STREET ***Dealt to LFISGD2ME [Ah Jh 9h] [8s]Dealt to Intrepid [Js] [5c]Intrepid: checks LFISGD2ME: bets $10Intrepid: calls $10*** 5th STREET ***Dealt to LFISGD2ME [Ah Jh 9h 8s] [6h]Dealt to Intrepid [Js 5c] [7c]Intrepid: checks LFISGD2ME: bets $20Intrepid: calls $20*** 6th STREET ***Dealt to LFISGD2ME [Ah Jh 9h 8s 6h] [4h]Dealt to Intrepid [Js 5c 7c] [Td]Intrepid: checks LFISGD2ME: bets $20Intrepid: raises $20 to $40LFISGD2ME: raises $20 to $60Intrepid: raises $20 to $80Betting is cappedLFISGD2ME: calls $9 and is all-inUncalled bet ($11) returned to Intrepid*** RIVER ***Dealt to LFISGD2ME [Ah Jh 9h 8s 6h 4h] [5d]*** SHOW DOWN ***LFISGD2ME: shows [Ah Jh 9h 8s 6h 4h 5d] (a flush, Ace high)Intrepid: mucks hand LFISGD2ME collected $278 from pot*** SUMMARY ***Total pot $281 | Rake $3 Seat 2: CestSiBon folded on the 3rd StreetSeat 3: pokeroldmanl folded on the 3rd Street (didn't bet)Seat 4: LFISGD2ME showed [Ah Jh 9h 8s 6h 4h 5d] and won ($278) with a flush, Ace highSeat 5: Walking dude folded on the 3rd StreetSeat 6: Intrepid mucked [Jc 7s Js 5c 7c Td Qc]Seat 7: samajars folded on the 3rd Street (didn't bet)Seat 8: queenofhart folded on the 3rd Street Link to post Share on other sites
SwolyswoND 1 Posted July 17, 2008 Share Posted July 17, 2008 I don't necessarily like the 3-bet on third street. The villain has pretty much told you he has JJ+, which you are well behind right now. A 3-flush isn't THAT strong of a starting hand, even with an ace - I'd just call here and hope that villain reads me for split 9's and leads the whole way.If you're doing this play to disguise your hand, I don't mind it - but if you were doing it for straight value - I don't like it at all. Obviously it worked out, and the rest of the streets were fine, but I really don't like 3rd. Link to post Share on other sites
AmScray 355 Posted July 18, 2008 Share Posted July 18, 2008 7 Card Stud High ($10/$20), Ante $1, Bring-In $3 (converter)3rd Street - (0.70 SB)Seat 2: xx xx T ___calls___foldsSeat 3: xx xx 6 ___foldsHero: A J 9 ___raises___raisesSeat 5: xx xx 9 ___calls___foldsSeat 6: xx xx J ___raises___callsSeat 7: xx xx 7 ___foldsSeat 8: xx xx 4 ___brings-in___folds4th Street - (8.30 SB)Hero: A J 9 8 ___betsSeat 6: xx xx J 5 ___checks___calls5th Street - (5.15 BB)Hero: A J 9 8 6 ___betsSeat 6: xx xx J 5 7 ___checks___calls6th Street - (7.15 BB)Hero: A J 9 8 6 4 ___bets___raises___calls $9 and is all-inSeat 6: xx xx J 5 7 T ___checks___raises___raisesRiver - (14.60 BB)Hero: A J 9 8 6 4 5 ___all-inSeat 6: xx xx J 5 7 T xxTotal pot: (14.60 BB) Link to post Share on other sites
antistuff 0 Posted July 18, 2008 Share Posted July 18, 2008 I don't necessarily like the 3-bet on third street. The villain has pretty much told you he has JJ+, which you are well behind right now. A 3-flush isn't THAT strong of a starting hand, even with an ace - I'd just call here and hope that villain reads me for split 9's and leads the whole way.If you're doing this play to disguise your hand, I don't mind it - but if you were doing it for straight value - I don't like it at all. Obviously it worked out, and the rest of the streets were fine, but I really don't like 3rd.i don't play much stud, but i was reading through stud for advanced players. in it he gives a similar example and says that it is a three bet on third here every time. Link to post Share on other sites
Marchione 0 Posted July 19, 2008 Author Share Posted July 19, 2008 I love my play on 3rd knowing i have a jack and all my hearts are live~come on guys what about my equity and being short stacked - their might be a lesson to be had here ! Link to post Share on other sites
HangukMiguk 8 Posted July 19, 2008 Share Posted July 19, 2008 I highly doubt villain would have split jacks there. I would be willing to assume we're looking at QQ-J or TT-J over anything else. It's not a horrible play, I probably would've slowed down and played a smaller pot at the start when he raised 3rd, otherwise, I play it similarly.Results say my read was wrong, but I was still deduce that I'm looking at queens or tens more often than not. He is, at the very least, obv saying he has split nines beat. Link to post Share on other sites
Marchione 0 Posted July 19, 2008 Author Share Posted July 19, 2008 I cant check on 4th because i then announce i was 3 flush - If i were to check/fold i would have to do it on 5th if i bricked out .Also when it's 3 bet on 3rd and i only have 130$ he now knows that the I am committing my entire stack which should give him a chance to fold Link to post Share on other sites
Frez 0 Posted July 20, 2008 Share Posted July 20, 2008 Also when it's 3 bet on 3rd and i only have 130$ he now knows that the I am committing my entire stack which should give him a chance to foldI'm not sure I agree with that statement, but it's your statement, not mine. Could you expand on it please? You've put 3 SBs into the pot, there's 8 total there, and you have 13 more behind. I'm not sure I would feel committed there. Link to post Share on other sites
ROBBBIGG 0 Posted July 21, 2008 Share Posted July 21, 2008 looks pretty sweet Link to post Share on other sites
Marchione 0 Posted July 22, 2008 Author Share Posted July 22, 2008 I'm not sure I agree with that statement, but it's your statement, not mine. Could you expand on it please? You've put 3 SBs into the pot, there's 8 total there, and you have 13 more behind. I'm not sure I would feel committed there.if someone has a a short stack and they three bet you - at that point you know they are not folding, they are saying " my 130$ is going in and you better hit your draw" I fear the person with the short stack far more then they guy with the big stack Link to post Share on other sites
KingJames 11 Posted July 29, 2008 Share Posted July 29, 2008 As far as deception goes, the 3-bet on 3rd works...If villain has AA KK or even QQ I imagine they 4-bet, so I think that TT split jacks is most likelyHis check raise on 6th makes me think it's TT and made a setWell Played Link to post Share on other sites
DWMREP 0 Posted August 1, 2008 Share Posted August 1, 2008 I think three betting 3rd is good in some ways that it puts you in the lead, with position, assuming you don't catch a higher card than him. I like the bet on 4th as well,. but what was your plan if you happen to catch a total blank on 5th, do you slow down at that point and take a free card, trying to catch something, or do you continue with your bluff? Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now