Poker Superstars Match

[nutzbuster 7]

Not sure how old this episode is.Jennifer Harman on the button.Phil Helmuth is UTG +2. He gets Queens and goes all in. (he's been going all in a LOT)Jennifer looks down and finds As-Qs.She..............? :unsure:what do u think?

[chgocubs99 0]

Since there is no POKER involved in Poker superstars, I refuse to watch it.

[eYank 0]

Since there is no POKER involved in Poker superstars, I refuse to watch it.

yeah it has such a bad structure but i didnt see this but i bet jen folded. she makes crazy reads

[nutzbuster 7]

yeah it has such a bad structure but i didnt see this but i bet jen folded. she makes crazy reads

Yeah.That's it allright.She looked at Phil for about a half second, her eyes darted to his face/his hands/and back to his face again.Insta fold. Pretty amazing.

[solo319 0]

It was a decent fold but really she just played the player, pretty basic IMO

[socalpoker_j 1]

She made the laydown, and Howard said she had to call their because the structure dictated it.

[eYank 0]

She made the laydown, and Howard said she had to call their because the structure dictated it.

well the structure is terrible

[astros11ss 0]

eh, i think she knows the great phil hellmuth doesn't push all in with less than aq... either ak or a high pocket pair, and she could easily be dominated... not that graet a fold i don't think.

[gkunit20 1]

I will say, the episode with Hellmuth and Matusow had me dying of laughter.Sure the structure sucks, but it's more for entertainment purposes than acutal winning money purposes.Who won last nights episode? I missed it.

[AceJackOffS 0]

I will say, the episode with Hellmuth and Matusow had me dying of laughter.Sure the structure sucks, but it's more for entertainment purposes than acutal winning money purposes.Who won last nights episode? I missed it.

barry greenstein won beat ivey heads up, daniel out in 5th

[cdipierr 0]

People who complain about the structure of Superstars don't get the concept. It's all about managing the overall tournament, not the individual games. You could argue that's not tournament poker, and doesn't prove the winner is a "superstar", but that's fine, it's just a different style of game. Still entertaining.

[AceJackOffS 0]

Still entertaining.

I understand that it isn't conventional poker but I still watch because the constant needleing between players is priceless

[gkunit20 1]

People who complain about the structure of Superstars don't get the concept. It's all about managing the overall tournament, not the individual games. You could argue that's not tournament poker, and doesn't prove the winner is a "superstar", but that's fine, it's just a different style of game. Still entertaining.

I think that's more the point with this tournament. It doesn't look like a typical tournament when watching. The players are laughing, and really just enjoying themselves, kinda like a buy-in freeroll.