Jump to content

Bush Administration Official Says 911 Is "inside Job"


Recommended Posts

It's been said before on this board, but it didnt really take off. I did nto want to press the topic yet I feel as I can't wait any longer.Bush official videovisit my sig for other videos.EDIT: the video in question for everyone here is actually Loose Change (seen here). Watch and realize how little you knew about 9/11. It does not submit 100 percent facts, but it will open your eyes to the cover up.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 286
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It's been said before on this board, but it didnt really take off. I did nto want to press the topic yet I feel as I can't wait any longer.Bush official videovisit my sig for other videos.
Haven't watched it all yet, but.... :club::D:D:D
Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL.... dude, this guy started working for Bush a week before 9-11? Wow, I'll bet he was totally in 'the know' about this situation. I'm sure he helped with last minute planning... lol... nh.

Link to post
Share on other sites
LOL.... dude, this guy started working for Bush a week before 9-11? Wow, I'll bet he was totally in 'the know' about this situation. I'm sure he helped with last minute planning... lol... nh.
LOL brvheart has a point!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Congressman Ron Paul, R-TexCongresswoman Cynthia Mckinney US Senator Mark DaytonRobert Bowman, head of space programs for Deparment of DefenseI'm willing to guess that MANY of the public officials know that either a) the government Let It Happen On Purpose or b ) Made It Happen On Purpose. (LIHOP and MIHOP are the acronyms in the truth seeking community). They just don't have the balls to speak out. Either that or they are on the villain's side. :club: Make no mistake, if you look at ALL the evidence of 9/11, you are in one of these categories.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i personally have questioned the whole 9/11 thing but when the video is dated from like the 2nd you know its a bunch of bs because we would have heard this on the news all over by now.EDITwatch this thoughhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=15...11+loose+changethat one is well worth the 1hour and 20 minutes. it has a ton of info showing why many of the events that happened on 9/11 dont seem real/realistic. it uses science to prove things that happened untrue

Link to post
Share on other sites
i personally have questioned the whole 9/11 thing but when the video is dated from like the 2nd you know its a bunch of bs because we would have heard this on the news all over by now.
Yeah... cause the media is all over conspiracy stories.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah... cause the media is all over conspiracy stories.
i meant that if bush admin had come out saying it was an inside job it would be front page news. i didnt watch the video so that might not be what its about
Link to post
Share on other sites

I hate George Bush more than most people do, but I will give him the respect to say there is no way he did this. Could we have done more to prevent 911? Probably. Did they let 911 happen on purpose? I say not a chance in hell.

Link to post
Share on other sites
that "documentary" is laughable, dont waste your time.
That documentary has a obvious point; ask questions, demand answers. It does not ahve to be 100 percent true. In fact they tell you a few of there points are conjectures (see: Pentagon missile theory), not pure fact. They tell you when they are presenting facts. Would you like to state why exactly loose change is a waste of time?don't like that documentary?watch these.911 Eyewitness911 revisitedTerrorStorm911 the Road to TyrannyDavid Griffin911 Comission Report: Omissions and Distortions BYU Physics Professor Steven Jones (NOTE: Loose change 2nd edition is probalby the best documentary out there to. get. you. started. It doesn't stop there.)
I hate George Bush more than most people do, but I will give him the respect to say there is no way he did this. Could we have done more to prevent 911? Probably. Did they let 911 happen on purpose? I say not a chance in hell.
I can prove it. Not Kidding.
i meant that if bush admin had come out saying it was an inside job it would be front page news. i didnt watch the video so that might not be what its about
hahaha, the media? **** no. They are doing everything in their power to supress the truth movement.
Link to post
Share on other sites
prove it
it will take about one week and 25 hours of your time, you ready? (if you wish we can go an hour a day or so of material, i don't mean to rush or pile on anything)I've spent the last two months researching this in all of my spare time. I only come back to fullcontact for brief moments. I guess this place is addictive or something.
Link to post
Share on other sites
it will take about one week and 25 hours of your time, you ready? (if you wish we can go an hour a day or so of material, i don't mean to rush or pile on anything)
I just want thisWhat is the government benefitting from doing 9/11?
Link to post
Share on other sites
it will take about one week and 25 hours of your time, you ready? (if you wish we can go an hour a day or so of material, i don't mean to rush or pile on anything)I've spent the last two months researching this in all of my spare time. I only come back to fullcontact for brief moments. I guess this place is addictive or something.
yeah someone who thinks the same thing as me. loose change is all you need imo. that has it all.
Link to post
Share on other sites
I just want thisWhat is the government benefitting from doing 9/11?
Thank you God, some people are beginning to think and ask questions!!There are a multitude of reasons the goverment would allow an event such as this to happen. for STARTERS (and i mean this in a big way), the US dollar. Realize that the US dollar value rides very heavily on the the purchase of oil around the world. OPEC at first demanded that the US dollar be used for all oil purchases. This greatly raised the value of our dollar, as the economy needed American dollars for purchase. So everyone was trading oil using US currency. Iraq, Iran, the whole gambit. Iraq first to change, and an example is set
The dollar is the de facto world reserve currency: the US currency accounts for approximately two thirds of all official exchange reserves. More than four-fifths of all foreign exchange transactions and half of all world exports are denominated in dollars. In addition, all IMF loans are denominated in dollars.But the more dollars there are circulating outside the US, or invested by foreign owners in American assets, the more the rest of the world has had to provide the US with goods and services in exchange for these dollars. The dollars cost the US next to nothing to produce, so the fact that the world uses the currency in this way means that the US is importing vast quantities of goods and services virtually for free.
also note...
So far only one OPEC country has dared switch to the euro: Iraq, in November 20002, 3. There is little doubt that this was a deliberate attempt by Saddam to strike back at the US, but in economic terms it has also turned out to have been a huge success: at the time of Iraq's conversion the euro was worth around 83 US cents but it is now worth over $1.05. There may however be other consequences to this decision.One other OPEC country has been talking publicly about possible conversion to the euro since 1999: Iran2,4, a country which has since been included in the George W. Bush's 'axis of evil'.A third OPEC country which has recently fallen out with the US government is Venezuela and it too has been showing disloyalty to the dollar. Under Hugo Chavez's rule, Venezuela has established barter deals for trading its oil with 12 Latin American countries as well as Cuba. This means that the US is missing out on its usual subsidy and might help explain the American wish to see the back of Chavez. At the OPEC summit in September 2000, Chavez delivered to the OPEC heads of state the report of the 'International Seminar on the Future of Energy', a conference called by Chavez earlier that year to examine the future supplies of both fossil and renewable energies. One of the two key recommendations of the report was that 'OPEC take advantage of high-tech electronic barter and bi-lateral exchanges of its oil with its developing country customers'5, i.e. OPEC should avoid using both the dollar and the euro for many transactions.
note: the seemingly random numbers in the quoted text are sources, sorry for any confusion.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Let us also not forget that the US/Unocal (it might as well be the same thing, our politicians are neck deep in oil) had been trying to secure a deal with the unstable Taliban regime for a 1040 mile pipeline, directly through Afghanistan. After years of back and forth and finally the Taliban not agreeing on a deal, the decision was made; one last offer of a "carpet of gold, or be buried in a carpet of bombs"They refused, and the plans of an Afghanistan invasion were in the works.BBC news, Attack plannedOilness again

To be truthful about it, there was no way we could have got the public consent to have suddenly launched a campaign on Afghanistan but for what happened on September 11."Tony Blair. July 17, 2002 [Guardian]
Never knew that we were planning attacks on Afghanistan before 911, did you?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...