Jump to content

tournament results 2006


Recommended Posts

Date Tournament Buyin Result Place ProfitJan 5th WPT Bahamas $8,000 0 - -$8,000 Jan 15th Aussie Millions $7,538 0 - -$7,538Jan 19th WPT Tunica, $10,000 0 - -$10,000Jan 23rd WSOP Tunica $10,000 $755,525 1 +745,525Jan 29th WPT Borgata $10,000 0 - -$10,000Feb 16th WPT LAPC $10,000 0 - -$10,000Feb 22nd WPT Invitational 0 0 - -$0Feb 27th WPT Bay 101 $10,000 0 - -$10,000Mar 4th NBC Heads Up $20,000 $75,000 5 +$55,000Mar 27th WPT Reno $5,100 0 - -$5100Apr 6th WPT Foxwoods $10,000 0 - -$10,000Apr 18th WPT Bellagio $25,000 0 - -$25,000May 14 WPT Mirage $10,000 0 - -$10,000Jun 4 WPT Mandalay $10,000 0 - -$10,000Jun 16 WSOP Tahoe $10,000 0 - -$10,000Jun 25 WSOP TOC $0 $325,000 2 +$325,000Jun 28 WSOP $1,500 0 - -$1,500Jun 29 WSOP $1,500 0 - -$1,500Jun 30 WSOP $2,500 $38,852 8 +$36,352Jul 02 WSOP $3,000 0 - -$3,000Jul 03 WSOP $2,000 $48,776 7 +46,776Jul 06 WSOP $5,000 0 - -$5,000Jul 07 WSOP $2500 0 - -$2,500Jul 08 WSOP $9000 0 - -$9,000Jul 09 WSOP $10,000 $12,295 20 +$2,295Jul 12 WSOP $50,000 0 - -$50,000Jul 14 WSOP $2000 0 - -$2,000Jul 15 WSOP $3000 0 - -$3,000Jul 19 WSOP $2500 $3878 38 +$1,378Jul 21 WSOP $2000 0 - -$2,000 not added yet:Jul 23 WSOP $50,000 0 - -$50,000Jul 30 WSOP $10,000 $42,882 229 +$32,882Aug 27 WPT Bike $10,000 0 - -$10,000Oct 16 WPT Bellagio $10,300 0 - -$10,300Oct 22 WPT Niagara $2,400 0 - -$ 2,400Oct 25 WPT Niagara $9,200 0 - -$ 9,200Oct 27 NBC PAD $20,000 1 $120,000 +$100,000 Totals: $364,038 +$1,078,470Profit Per Tournament: 37 Tournaments +$29,147.84Overall Results from 2005 to present:Tournaments: 92Buy ins: $723,838Payouts: $1,954,520Profit: $1,230,682Profit per tournament: $13,376.98

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Daniel, would a realistic goal be to reach the final table once out of every 10 tournament? Higher percentage or lower? i seem to remember reading Lederer say something about cashing one in ten
If you don't consider yourself at a disadvantage or advantage to the field, ie you are dead-even in skill with a hypothetically average player in the field, then your odds of cashing are basically: [places paid]/[total entrants]Drastically oversimplified? Yes. Flame on.
Link to post
Share on other sites
If you don't consider yourself at a disadvantage or advantage to the field, ie you are dead-even in skill with a hypothetically average player in the field, then your odds of cashing are basically: [places paid]/[total entrants]Drastically oversimplified? Yes. Flame on.
Why? No one reads this forum.
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...

i thought dn lost $1M in one day, when are those results going to post? poor guy, I wouldn't want to post that either; i am curious what his total poker bankroll really is; any guesses? I would guess around $10M... Anyone else?

Link to post
Share on other sites
i thought dn lost $1M in one day, when are those results going to post? poor guy, I wouldn't want to post that either; i am curious what his total poker bankroll really is; any guesses? I would guess around $10M... Anyone else?
I don't know about the $1M loss in one day. If it happened, it was in a cash game. These are his 2006 tournament results, not cash game results.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Daniel,I heard that in one World Series rebuy event, you rebought enough times to buy a luxury car. If it so, can you give more details on why you rebought so many times? Is that your strategy?As for me, I only rebuy if I think I can take down my immediate table and just got unlucky to lose all my chips. :club:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Daniel,I heard that in one World Series rebuy event, you rebought enough times to buy a luxury car. If it so, can you give more details on why you rebought so many times? Is that your strategy?As for me, I only rebuy if I think I can take down my immediate table and just got unlucky to lose all my chips. :club:
if you have a late breaking table, the idea is to get as many chips on the table as possible if you feel you have an edge over the table. eventually, you're going to win a few consecutive all ins and wind up with a big stack, and then out play your opponents for the rest of the chips you've put out there, so when your table does break, you go into the later levels of a tournament with a huge stack.he also does it as stress relief
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, that logic doesn't make sense to me.What is a "late breaking table"?How are you eventually going to win a few consecutive all-ins?Thanks for the comments.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok, that logic doesn't make sense to me.What is a "late breaking table"?How are you eventually going to win a few consecutive all-ins?Thanks for the comments.
a late breaking table is one that the players are sent to another table later in the game.When you are at these tables, the table tends to go through several less heavily bankrolled players and more chips are available to increase your stack and put you in a better position for the next table you end up at. Once you win a couple all-ins, you are in a better position to play in several different ways. The most common being power playing the short stacks.If you have 10k in chips and the short stack has 1k, 500 is alot to them and they have a bigger chance of folding on a so-so hand or a draw. 500 to you isn't that big a deal and you can chance it with the same type of hand.In the end, if you are a good player, you will get quite a stack before moving.Hope that answers your question.Steve
Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets face it. It seems like Daniel is a bit less eager to report his bad results than his good results. I have a question for you daniel, seriously: do you feel it is more painfull to report a bad result than a good result, or don't you really care too much?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Lets face it. It seems like Daniel is a bit less eager to report his bad results than his good results. I have a question for you daniel, seriously: do you feel it is more painfull to report a bad result than a good result, or don't you really care too much?
Dude! Did you post this very rude and intrusive question on every board in the forum? It's like you are challenging Daniel in some way, almost like you have a cynical attitude towards him. Hello! OF COURSE it's more painful to report losses than wins! Have you been on this planet long? Any disappointment, whether it is cash or any other matter, is a disappointment and one isn't always eager to spread negativity. He reports his monetary losses right there with his gains ... are you just wanting a step-by-step replay about how he got those losses or what????Geez, man .... get some manners.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Dude! Did you post this very rude and intrusive question on every board in the forum? It's like you are challenging Daniel in some way, almost like you have a cynical attitude towards him. Hello! OF COURSE it's more painful to report losses than wins! Have you been on this planet long? Any disappointment, whether it is cash or any other matter, is a disappointment and one isn't always eager to spread negativity. He reports his monetary losses right there with his gains ... are you just wanting a step-by-step replay about how he got those losses or what????Geez, man .... get some manners.
Your posting is not exactly manner full, I would say.But for your information: there were no rudenes in my posting.Just a simple question to understand the psychology of a super pro.It could have been, that these guys simply don't care about the losses,as they are part of the game. This is - I understand - the approach Berry Greenstein and Chip Reese is having.I found it interesting, that apparantly Daniel N. does seem to bother about his loss.
Link to post
Share on other sites
×
×
  • Create New...