Jump to content

What Do The Following Players Have In Common?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 151
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Daniel NegreanuMike SextonChip Reese Phil IveyDoyle BrunsonTodd BrunsonBarry GreensteinJennifer HarmanMark SeifJohn Juanda I'm looking for a specific answer, take your best guess.
Lots of green
Link to post
Share on other sites
Daniel NegreanuMike SextonChip Reese Phil IveyDoyle BrunsonTodd BrunsonBarry GreensteinJennifer HarmanMark SeifJohn Juanda I'm looking for a specific answer, take your best guess.
- have all played in the big game - all play on a poker site- all against the lawsuit- all have money- all put their right shoe on before their left
Link to post
Share on other sites
- have all played in the big game - all play on a poker site- all against the lawsuit- all have money- all put their right shoe on before their left
I wouldn't think Seif has played in the Big GameMy first guess was that they are against the WPT Lawsuit.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Daniel NegreanuMike SextonChip Reese Phil IveyDoyle BrunsonTodd BrunsonBarry GreensteinJennifer HarmanMark SeifJohn Juanda I'm looking for a specific answer, take your best guess.
One thing certain is they all won a bracelet at the WSOP.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Im pritty sure that loosechips is david benyamine.
Looseslots is Benyamine.
Daniel NegreanuMike SextonChip Reese Phil IveyDoyle BrunsonTodd BrunsonBarry GreensteinJennifer HarmanMark SeifJohn Juanda I'm looking for a specific answer, take your best guess.
They have all won at least $857,999 in tournaments :club:
Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess that was easier than I thought. All of these players are against the players involved in the lawsuit. I bring this up, because in a radio interview Andy Bloch claimed that I was the only one opposed to it and everyone he talked to was supportive. Funny, because I haven't talked to anyone who supports this ridiculous and damaging lawsuit. It is so infuriating to me, that I'm not even sure I can look at these people without wanting to spit. There is a divide in the poker world due to this whether they want to admit it or not. I know that I'm on the right side. I look at the people on this list and see a group who really do care about poker's well being and they "get it." The other group's MAIN objective with this lawsuit is shameful- money. As Raymer what the primary goal is- they are looking to collect damages.

Link to post
Share on other sites
True although he plays on FTP as loosechips
chip's name in caseyatthebat
I guess that was easier than I thought. All of these players are against the players involved in the lawsuit. I bring this up, because in a radio interview Andy Bloch claimed that I was the only one opposed to it and everyone he talked to was supportive. Funny, because I haven't talked to anyone who supports this ridiculous and damaging lawsuit. It is so infuriating to me, that I'm not even sure I can look at these people without wanting to spit. There is a divide in the poker world due to this whether they want to admit it or not. I know that I'm on the right side. I look at the people on this list and see a group who really do care about poker's well being and they "get it." The other group's MAIN objective with this lawsuit is shameful- money. As Raymer what the primary goal is- they are looking to collect damages.
Daniel do I win a prize for answering first?
Link to post
Share on other sites

It is so infuriating to me, that I'm not even sure I can look at these people without wanting to spit.Is it that personal DN? Also interesting to see that there are some FTP pros against and for the lawsuit.

Link to post
Share on other sites
It is so infuriating to me, that I'm not even sure I can look at these people without wanting to spit.
Give me an address... I'll take care of it for you.
Link to post
Share on other sites

DN: I'm a fan; I once got your autograph at the Bike in L.A. I gotta ask: where has anybody said they're in it for the money? All the accounts I've read are that they say they're standing on "principle" and they care more about the poker than making anything off the suit.Keep in mind I haven't got even 1% of the "inside" knowledge you do about this situation. I don't talk to Barry Greenstein regularly, nor do I have Steve Lipscomb's cell number, etc. Frankly, I don't know definitively who's right and who's wrong on these issues. That's for the courts to decide or the parties to settle on their own.That said, I think you're starting to come off as way too over the top in your reaction to this suit. The things you're saying about these 7 players (even after Raymer's ridiculous comments about you, which were admittedly classless) are no good. You've always seemed to be a laid-back, easygoing, fairminded guy. Why go out on a limb so far like you've been doing? Wouldn't you rather see this played out the right way rather than through successive poker forum attacks and the media? With the exception of potential changes to how the WPT does business with casinos and players, how does the suit itself affect you? Are you worried about your side ventures? If so, explain that because I'd love to know what you see happening in specifics.I don't really have an opinion as to its timing or the potential effects it may have on the industry, but I do think you gotta take a deep breath and slow down, man.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...