Jump to content

Alarming Pt3 Numbers...


Recommended Posts

So, finally bothered to get the 60-day PT3 trial, put in my most recent 10k hands and started checking everything out. 10k hands, 7800 at 10NL, 1700 at 5NL and about 500 at 25NL.Anyway, the stats that struck me as weird as hell was the hands that I've lost the most with. Some of my biggest losing hands overall are JJ, QQ, AQs and KK. This......HAS to be a REALLY bad thing, no? Is this the sign of an obvious problem, or is it just probably a bad run? As far as my KK history goes, the only hands I've lost with them are AAvKK AIPF (5 of out 60 in my sample), the rare one where I get shoved on an A high board and one I played like an idiot.I haven't looked over my JJ/QQ/AQs stats nearly as closely, but are there specific things I should maybe look for in the hands I lost? Or maybe even the hands I won post flop? Could I possibly be missing a boatload of value from these hands and that's why they're so far behind?I'm a total rookie with PT3 so please feel free to assume I know nothing :club:

Link to post
Share on other sites

10K hands isn't really a big enough sample size to draw any specific conclusions from. Also, keep in mind that when you are dealing with 3 different stakes, your money won will be skewed. You need to look for big blinds won rather than money won. For example, you may have stacked 3 people with JJ in 2NL, and assuming you were both 100bb deep, that would be only a $6 profit. You could easily lose $6 in one hand with JJ in 25NL where you weren't even all-in.What I would do is review all the hands that you had JJ, QQ, KK, AQ and make a note on hands that you were unsure whether you played them correctly. Then convert and post them here. Without specific hands to look at, it will be hard to figure out where your leak might be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

During my brief foray into cash NLHE I had similar stats over a small sample: at 10NL I was an overall loser with AA. Like Doyle says, AA will win small pots and lose big ones. You need a large enough sample for the small wins to offset the few times you lost your stack when your AA got cracked.

Link to post
Share on other sites
During my brief foray into cash NLHE I had similar stats over a small sample: at 10NL I was an overall loser with AA. Like Doyle says, AA will win small pots and lose big ones. You need a large enough sample for the small wins to offset the few times you lost your stack when your AA got cracked.
Now that I'm taking schnibb's advice here and looking at it in terms of BB's won/hand, I'm actually playing KK profitably, so perhaps panic mode should be averted. Now I have another potentially interesting tidbit. You say you were losing overall with AA? AA for me here is FAR and away my most profitable hand. Very far. Although QQ and AQs are my two hands deepest in the red, with JJ not far behind.The more I look at the numbers here, the more I realize that you guys are bang-on that I need a bigger sample. I think my QQ stats are skewed right now because I've only got 52 hands with QQ and a couple of them I stacked off 100+ bb's after flopping top set and losing to running straights/flushes.I've exposed my biggest leak with QQ though. I need to run better :club:
Link to post
Share on other sites
Now that I'm taking schnibb's advice here and looking at it in terms of BB's won/hand, I'm actually playing KK profitably, so perhaps panic mode should be averted. Now I have another potentially interesting tidbit. You say you were losing overall with AA? AA for me here is FAR and away my most profitable hand. Very far. Although QQ and AQs are my two hands deepest in the red, with JJ not far behind.The more I look at the numbers here, the more I realize that you guys are bang-on that I need a bigger sample. I think my QQ stats are skewed right now because I've only got 52 hands with QQ and a couple of them I stacked off 100+ bb's after flopping top set and losing to running straights/flushes.I've exposed my biggest leak with QQ though. I need to run better :club:
mbn
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...