gruven 530 Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 I'm assuming that, in the event of a tie for best record, there will be a split of the cash? Link to post Share on other sites
Theraflu 1,035 Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 I'm assuming that, in the event of a tie for best record, there will be a split of the cash?i wish i had a picture of search function, im sure the topic isnt more than a page or two back.edit: after 15 seconds of searching, i found it....hell you were the one to last reply to it. Link to post Share on other sites
gruven 530 Posted July 24, 2006 Author Share Posted July 24, 2006 i wish i had a picture of search function, im sure the topic isnt more than a page or two back.edit: after 15 seconds of searching, i found it....hell you were the one to last reply to it. LOL....... i thought that was for the tie breakers to decide division winners, not for best overall.... I could def. be wrong, tho.... too many concussions.. Link to post Share on other sites
chaosnhavoc 0 Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 Why are teams with default wins/losses still considered for best record. I think a clean playing record should be in consideration. Link to post Share on other sites
looshle 6 Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 Why are teams with default wins/losses still considered for best record. I think a clean playing record should be in consideration.Teams should be punished for getting a deafult win??Also, we are 9-4 with 2 default losses yet we should rank lower than a 9-4 team with no default losses? Link to post Share on other sites
chaosnhavoc 0 Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 Teams should be punished for getting a deafult win??Also, we are 9-4 with 2 default losses yet we should rank lower than a 9-4 team with no default losses?But best record should be exactly that best record to actual games played.If I won all games upto now by default do you see that as fair for best record? Link to post Share on other sites
sleuthis 0 Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 But best record should be exactly that best record to actual games played.If I won all games upto now by default do you see that as fair for best record?it would be grossly unfair to punish a team because someone ELSE made a mistake. Link to post Share on other sites
fleung22 1 Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 it would be grossly unfair to punish a team because someone ELSE made a mistake.My thoughts exactly.I think the teams with default wins sometimes get flack for getting a "cheap win"I don't care about the $10 and I love the thrill of winning heads up...that's why I wanted to be part of the league.That being said...my time is valuable and to sit there an hour waiting for a match that doesn't take place totally sucks. I have always been respectful of all my opponents and expect the same. The fact that I'm prepared to play and then winning because somebody doesn't show up should not be a tie-breaking factor. chaosnhavoc...you got default envy Link to post Share on other sites
GrinderMJ 0 Posted July 28, 2006 Share Posted July 28, 2006 Why are teams with default wins/losses still considered for best record. I think a clean playing record should be in consideration.This is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Link to post Share on other sites
zimmer4141 0 Posted July 28, 2006 Share Posted July 28, 2006 This is the stupidest thing I've ever heard.Second that notion. Link to post Share on other sites
GrinderMJ 0 Posted July 28, 2006 Share Posted July 28, 2006 Second that notion.If there was an award for showing up the most, me and Looshle wouldn't be in good shape, but defaults have nothing to do with best record you know. Link to post Share on other sites
fleung22 1 Posted July 28, 2006 Share Posted July 28, 2006 If there was an award for showing up the most, me and Looshle wouldn't be in good shape, but defaults have nothing to do with best record you know.In fact I find it particularly impressive your team is still in the running for best regular season record after 2 default losses.To think you guys could have a 12-2 record is sick! Link to post Share on other sites
zimmer4141 0 Posted July 28, 2006 Share Posted July 28, 2006 In fact I find it particularly impressive your team is still in the running for best regular season record after 2 default losses.To think you guys could have a 12-2 record is sick!Yeah, and to think that I have to face them in the wildcard match if they lose this week is also pretty sick. Link to post Share on other sites
chaosnhavoc 0 Posted July 28, 2006 Share Posted July 28, 2006 This is the stupidest thing I've ever heard.This was just a drunk thought that my wife talked me into posting.. I agree with everyones opinion on this now that a sober moment has taken place. But now that I have gotten all this attention:5150's will take it in large unmarked bills. Thanks Link to post Share on other sites
looshle 6 Posted July 28, 2006 Share Posted July 28, 2006 But best record should be exactly that best record to actual games played.If I won all games upto now by default do you see that as fair for best record?Ok so we are 12-2.Get it? Link to post Share on other sites
Theraflu 1,035 Posted July 28, 2006 Share Posted July 28, 2006 Ok so we are 12-2.Get it?send me some money. Link to post Share on other sites
chaosnhavoc 0 Posted July 30, 2006 Share Posted July 30, 2006 My thoughts exactly.I think the teams with default wins sometimes get flack for getting a "cheap win"I don't care about the $10 and I love the thrill of winning heads up...that's why I wanted to be part of the league.That being said...my time is valuable and to sit there an hour waiting for a match that doesn't take place totally sucks. I have always been respectful of all my opponents and expect the same. The fact that I'm prepared to play and then winning because somebody doesn't show up should not be a tie-breaking factor. chaosnhavoc...you got default envy No I am just anxious to spend my half of the money! Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts