jmbreslin 0 Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 Options (number of votes):1. jmbreslin's proposal (2)1st-60 2nd-55 3rd-50 4th-465th-446th-427th-408th-379th-3510th-13th-3014th-18th-2519th-27th-2028th-36th-1037th-45th-52. Vtlaxer's proposal (5)1st: 602nd 453rd 354th 305th 276th 247th 218th 189th 1510th-13th 1014th-18th 719th-27th 328th-45th 0 3. cdipierr's proposal (2)1 = 4502 = 3153 = 2254 = 1585 = 1136 = 907 = 778 = 639 = 5410 = 4511 = 4112 = 3613 = 3214 = 2715 = 2216 = 1817 = 1818 = 1419 = 1420 = 1421 = 922 = 923 = 524th -> 45th = 04. qyayqi's proposal1st = 1542nd = 1373rd = 1214th = 1065 = 926 = 797 = 678 = 569 = 4610 = 3711 = 2912 = 2213 = 1614 = 1115 = 716 = 417 = 218 = 15. jmbreslin's alternate proposalInstead of assigning points, just calculate each player's average finish over the 30 tournies and the best average finish wins. Link to post Share on other sites
jmbreslin 0 Posted February 21, 2008 Author Share Posted February 21, 2008 Tried to do a poll but I can't figure out how to make it work. Oh well. Link to post Share on other sites
Vtlaxer09 4 Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 Tried to do a poll but I can't figure out how to make it work. Oh well.well thats just disappointing. Link to post Share on other sites
qyayqi 11 Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 you can delete mine, i'll vote vt's. it gives a good range while not eliminating everyone if someone fires off a couple 1sts. Link to post Share on other sites
SBriand 4 Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 vt's Link to post Share on other sites
Poker Addict 0 Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 I third that vote... go with VT! Link to post Share on other sites
qyayqi 11 Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 note: small quibble, you have to change the ranges in vt's. you can't have:10th-14th 1014th-18th 718th-27th 327th-45th 0 it should be: 10th-13th 1014th-18th 719th-27th 328th-45th 0 Link to post Share on other sites
MyPlayIsRAB 0 Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 i believe jmreslin or whoevers is atually my suggestion, and imo/iaf its the best option Link to post Share on other sites
Vtlaxer09 4 Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 i believe vtlaxer09's is the best option imoFYP and IAF Link to post Share on other sites
qyayqi 11 Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 oh good, we're breaking out the imo's & boxes. let us know in the other thread what the results are, jm. Link to post Share on other sites
jmbreslin 0 Posted February 21, 2008 Author Share Posted February 21, 2008 note: small quibble, you have to change the ranges in vt's. you can't have:10th-14th 1014th-18th 718th-27th 327th-45th 0 it should be: 10th-13th 1014th-18th 719th-27th 328th-45th 0That is a small quibble, but you're right. Link to post Share on other sites
jmbreslin 0 Posted February 21, 2008 Author Share Posted February 21, 2008 i believe jmreslin or whoevers is atually my suggestion, and imo/iaf its the best optionWhich one, (1) or (4)? Link to post Share on other sites
CodyHartman 0 Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 FYP and IAFi thought u could only post [x]iaf Link to post Share on other sites
tealsea 0 Posted February 22, 2008 Share Posted February 22, 2008 2. Vtlaxer's proposal Link to post Share on other sites
MrSputter 0 Posted February 22, 2008 Share Posted February 22, 2008 I like three3 for meSeems better for winning a couple of times or close Link to post Share on other sites
jeff_536 3 Posted February 22, 2008 Share Posted February 22, 2008 so what's the deal here guys? This sounds like something i might want to play in.How much do we put up?What level 45's do we play?Does it have to be NLHE? PM if you wanna keep it out of here.thanks. Link to post Share on other sites
jmbreslin 0 Posted February 22, 2008 Author Share Posted February 22, 2008 so what's the deal here guys? This sounds like something i might want to play in.How much do we put up? most likely $10What level 45's do we play? any buy-in, but obviously not play moneyDoes it have to be NLHE? yes Link to post Share on other sites
nowandlater 0 Posted February 22, 2008 Share Posted February 22, 2008 first 1 Link to post Share on other sites
qyayqi 11 Posted February 22, 2008 Share Posted February 22, 2008 does it really have to be nlhe? they have some 45 turbos in other events. Link to post Share on other sites
jmbreslin 0 Posted February 22, 2008 Author Share Posted February 22, 2008 I'd rather just stick with NLHE. Link to post Share on other sites
Poker Addict 0 Posted February 22, 2008 Share Posted February 22, 2008 I'd rather just stick with NLHE.I kinda understand, and I kinda don't. If we can get more people in by playing allowing a range of games - as long as the size of the SNG is the same, does it matter? I will be playing NLHE. Just wanted to know your thoughts. Link to post Share on other sites
jmbreslin 0 Posted February 22, 2008 Author Share Posted February 22, 2008 It just seems a bit strange to have people competing in a challenge playing different games. The idea behind the challenge is to determine the best player in a particular type of tourney, not just in a particular type of structure. If that makes sense. Link to post Share on other sites
Big Jono 0 Posted February 22, 2008 Share Posted February 22, 2008 vtlaxers for me Link to post Share on other sites
jeff_536 3 Posted February 22, 2008 Share Posted February 22, 2008 No worries about the NL part of it. Lemme know when the next one is starting up.I asked cause I took down a 45-man O8 the other day.some baaaaaad players. Link to post Share on other sites
CodyHartman 0 Posted February 22, 2008 Share Posted February 22, 2008 #1 Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now