Jump to content

Recommended Posts

He was a great character, but never a focus of the show. He was the lone gunslinger in a show about the system. Stringer, Avon, Bunk, Cool Lester Smooth, McNulty. Then maybe Omar. But what about Bubbles and Marlo. Wallace? Deangelo? The show is the goat.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 6.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I think there needs to be a small white truck parked next to the scene of the accident, watching but not participating.

How was the crowd for The Lovely Bones?

That's how I felt when I saw Gangs of New York, followed closely by City of God. DDL is fantastic in Gangs, but the movie didn't do much for me. City Of God though, that's the real thing.     I don

I finally saw Get Out.

 

 

It feels racist to say anything other than I loved it. I thought it was ok. Its crafted well, but man, I was not expecting the racial violence porn angle. It's all just very bizarre to me. The same movie with the races reversed would legitimately get people killed in real life. I fully admit that I could have missed an underlying statement, but all white people from hipsters to old people to rednecks were the villain in this thing, and nobody good, including every cop at the police station, was white. This movie felt like it was created for black people that wanted to fantasize about killing white people. Again, I could be wrong. I would say that it was like a Tarintino movie but against white people, but Tarintino movies are already revenge porn against mostly white people.

 

 

Still, I enjoyed the story. It was good.

 

 

 

I have been thinking about how to more fully respond to this, off and on for the past couple days. I didn't just want to be snarky, and give you a serious response, because I think you're being earnest, and you're not a horrible monster like Essay.

When you say something like, "the same movie with the races reversed would legitimately get people killed in real life" it makes me think you missed the entire point of the movie, because switching races in this story would be nonsensical. What I think you're missing, is that this movie is generally about the black american experience, and specifically Jordan Peele's experience, in interacting with liberal white people. Peele grew up one the upper west side of manhattan, surrounded by wealthy, upper class, largely liberal white people. He was perpetually in situations where he was the only black person or one of the very few black people, in social and professional situations. I assume he has dated white women and met their wealthy, liberal parents. This movie is about the angst resulting from that feeling of otherness, in those social situations It is about, specifically, the racism of liberal whites. About, even though they profess to accept and support black people, black people perpatually feel like the "other", never fully accepted, that they are being treated differently ( and they are right, largely, they are being treated differently). Reversing that doesn't make any sense. How many times have you been in situations where you were the only white person or one of the very few? How many of those times, were the black people upper class, highly educated elites? I personally have rarely been in the former situation, and never in the later. The movie doesn't work the other way around. If you were to make a movie, based on my fears and unease in being in those sorts of social situations, it would be a much different movie ( and you can argue that unease has been well portrayed in TV and movies for a long, long time)

 

The movie is also playing with classic black movie and tv tropes and conspiracy theories of the black community. The evil white girl that fetishizes black bodies and only dates black men is a trope in black movies and fiction, from Madea to power and on and on. There are all kinds of black conspiracies theories about rich white people's nefarious schemes to hurt black people, some based on kernels of truth, others wildly fictional ( "the plan" in washington dc, the CIA selling crack to black people, etc). So this movie is taking something, the social awkwardness and passive racism of interacting with "liberal" white people, taking the unease of those social situations of black people, and taking it to it's most far flung and paranoid extreme, for the purposes of making a horror story. I thought it was quite clever. To view it only from the view of revenge porn and equating it with something like Django or Inglorious ( which draw much more directly from Exploitation movies, that are revenge porn), I think really misses the point. The violent ending in Get out is basically like any other horror movie. It's what comes before that violence, that is what is interesting about the movie.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been thinking about how to more fully respond to this, off and on for the past couple days. I didn't just want to be snarky, and give you a serious response, because I think you're being earnest, and you're not a horrible monster like Essay.

When you say something like, "the same movie with the races reversed would legitimately get people killed in real life" it makes me think you missed the entire point of the movie, because switching races in this story would be nonsensical. What I think you're missing, is that this movie is generally about the black american experience, and specifically Jordan Peele's experience, in interacting with liberal white people. Peele grew up one the upper west side of manhattan, surrounded by wealthy, upper class, largely liberal white people. He was perpetually in situations where he was the only black person or one of the very few black people, in social and professional situations. I assume he has dated white women and met their wealthy, liberal parents. This movie is about the angst resulting from that feeling of otherness, in those social situations It is about, specifically, the racism of liberal whites. About, even though they profess to accept and support black people, black people perpatually feel like the "other", never fully accepted, that they are being treated differently ( and they are right, largely, they are being treated differently). Reversing that doesn't make any sense. How many times have you been in situations where you were the only white person or one of the very few? How many of those times, were the black people upper class, highly educated elites? I personally have rarely been in the former situation, and never in the later. The movie doesn't work the other way around. If you were to make a movie, based on my fears and unease in being in those sorts of social situations, it would be a much different movie ( and you can argue that unease has been well portrayed in TV and movies for a long, long time)

 

The movie is also playing with classic black movie and tv tropes and conspiracy theories of the black community. The evil white girl that fetishizes black bodies and only dates black men is a trope in black movies and fiction, from Madea to power and on and on. There are all kinds of black conspiracies theories about rich white people's nefarious schemes to hurt black people, some based on kernels of truth, others wildly fictional ( "the plan" in washington dc, the CIA selling crack to black people, etc). So this movie is taking something, the social awkwardness and passive racism of interacting with "liberal" white people, taking the unease of those social situations of black people, and taking it to it's most far flung and paranoid extreme, for the purposes of making a horror story. I thought it was quite clever. To view it only from the view of revenge porn and equating it with something like Django or Inglorious ( which draw much more directly from Exploitation movies, that are revenge porn), I think really misses the point. The violent ending in Get out is basically like any other horror movie. It's what comes before that violence, that is what is interesting about the movie.

 

Thanks for the response. He has definitely dated white girls, since he's married to one of the main white chicks in Brooklyn Nine-Nine.

 

I didn't view anything about Get Out to be liberal/conservative. Sure, the dad mentioned he would have voted for Obama, but I think that could be viewed as any of the hundreds of lies he told and not specific to a "liberal bubble" or whatever.

 

I definitely appreciated the subtle racism throughout and explained it to the kids that watched it with me. (i.e. Mentioning Tiger Woods, Jesse Owens, Obama, etc) I enjoyed that part, and it you think the end was just standard horror movie fare, I'll believe you. That's just not how I received it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been thinking about how to more fully respond to this, off and on for the past couple days. I didn't just want to be snarky, and give you a serious response, because I think you're being earnest, and you're not a horrible monster like Essay.

When you say something like, "the same movie with the races reversed would legitimately get people killed in real life" it makes me think you missed the entire point of the movie, because switching races in this story would be nonsensical. What I think you're missing, is that this movie is generally about the black american experience, and specifically Jordan Peele's experience, in interacting with liberal white people. Peele grew up one the upper west side of manhattan, surrounded by wealthy, upper class, largely liberal white people. He was perpetually in situations where he was the only black person or one of the very few black people, in social and professional situations. I assume he has dated white women and met their wealthy, liberal parents. This movie is about the angst resulting from that feeling of otherness, in those social situations It is about, specifically, the racism of liberal whites. About, even though they profess to accept and support black people, black people perpatually feel like the "other", never fully accepted, that they are being treated differently ( and they are right, largely, they are being treated differently). Reversing that doesn't make any sense. How many times have you been in situations where you were the only white person or one of the very few? How many of those times, were the black people upper class, highly educated elites? I personally have rarely been in the former situation, and never in the later. The movie doesn't work the other way around. If you were to make a movie, based on my fears and unease in being in those sorts of social situations, it would be a much different movie ( and you can argue that unease has been well portrayed in TV and movies for a long, long time)

 

The movie is also playing with classic black movie and tv tropes and conspiracy theories of the black community. The evil white girl that fetishizes black bodies and only dates black men is a trope in black movies and fiction, from Madea to power and on and on. There are all kinds of black conspiracies theories about rich white people's nefarious schemes to hurt black people, some based on kernels of truth, others wildly fictional ( "the plan" in washington dc, the CIA selling crack to black people, etc). So this movie is taking something, the social awkwardness and passive racism of interacting with "liberal" white people, taking the unease of those social situations of black people, and taking it to it's most far flung and paranoid extreme, for the purposes of making a horror story. I thought it was quite clever. To view it only from the view of revenge porn and equating it with something like Django or Inglorious ( which draw much more directly from Exploitation movies, that are revenge porn), I think really misses the point. The violent ending in Get out is basically like any other horror movie. It's what comes before that violence, that is what is interesting about the movie.

 

what you say here is obvious and true. the movie was about the "soft" racism of liberal whites. anybody who didn't get that must have been stone drunk when watching or mentally disabled - they certainly were not subtle about what they were trying to say. but that idea, that truth, doesn't make a good movie. the idea was clever, the execution was lacking. the main character is a great actor, his episode of black mirror being the best of that show, but he was left with nothing to work with in this movie. i just didn't think it was any good.

Link to post
Share on other sites

IT (Remake) - 6.5 / 10

I liked all of the actors. CGI effects were terrible. Not scary.

 

 

Justice League - 5 / 10

CGI was really, really, really bad. Predictable. I'd probably give it a 3 if I wasn't a fan of these types of movies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Things I've watched over the last few months, with grades that will mean nothing without context, that I'm not going to provide:

(on a 1-20 scale, because that seems different)

Rampage: 10

Den Of Thieves: 15

(new)Tomb Raider: 11

Ready Player One: 15

Hurricane Heist: 6

Game Night: 14

(new) Jumanji: 13

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

THE DEPARTED.

 

been a while since i watched it all the way through. one of the greats. alec baldwin killed it in the movie. damon was the weak link, but he played a sniveling little bitch pretty well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Damon was so far out of his league in that movie. Marky Mark acted circles around him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I, Tonya

 

I found it a slog to get through. If I wasn't watching with my wife I probably would have turned it off halfway through. I liked the ending though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I, Tonya

 

I found it a slog to get through. If I wasn't watching with my wife I probably would have turned it off halfway through. I liked the ending though.

 

was what's her face hot? any sex scenes a lonely guy like me needs to see?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Quiet Place - I had a hard time suspending disbelief. I don't think those people would've lasted as long as the opening xxx days after boards said. based on those kids they would've been gone in days or maybe a couple of weeks.

 

**** those kids most especially deaf girl.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Quiet Place - I had a hard time suspending disbelief. I don't think those people would've lasted as long as the opening xxx days after boards said. based on those kids they would've been gone in days or maybe a couple of weeks.

 

**** those kids most especially deaf girl.

 

Horror/scary films with monsters rely heavily on the audience being able to suspend their disbelief.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Horror/scary films with monsters rely heavily on the audience being able to suspend their disbelief.

 

Exactly. Years ago on another forum I was discussing the genre with a guy who has written for Fangoria and also published a horror novel whose approach I always liked. Once you require the audience to suspend disbelief far enough to accept your premise whether it be zombies actually exist, or vampires actually exist, or a doll possessed by a voo doo practicing serial killer actually exists; that's all you get. You can't keep asking them to incrementally further suspend belief later and then again even later. So I've suspended disbelief that there are these things hunting people and that they cue in on sound and that this family has survived how many ever weeks the first card says. Sounds cool, I'm in. Then almost immediately I'm expected to believe that in that time they haven't had to leave the farm and therefore, haven't figured out a strategy so they don't have to drag their entire ****ing family (including a 4 year old) on a quest through hostile territory that requires absolute silence. These little "asks" to suspend belief keep piling up until finally I'm asked to believe that when the deaf girl reads dad's note in the basement about the killers honing in on sound it's a revelation that allows her to suddenly put together to figure out how to fight them. As if they haven't been shushing that little dumbass the entire year or whatever.

 

It's an interesting premise that failed in execution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think if you didn't see the quiet place in a theater, you really missed out, because how alien the quietness is quite impactful, when you're in a giant theater full of people and you can hear every shift and cough people make echo in the giant space, as opposed to the barrage of sound you usually get in a theater.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think if you didn't see the quiet place in a theater, you really missed out, because how alien the quietness is quite impactful, when you're in a giant theater full of people and you can hear every shift and cough people make echo in the giant space, as opposed to the barrage of sound you usually get in a theater.

 

It was definitely an experience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i no longer enjoy restaurants simply because they are an experience but that ultimately serve shitty food, I stopped going to Casa Bonita as a child. And I no longer enjoy films that are an experience but ultimately tell a shitty story. I think that peaked for me when torture porn like green inferno came into vogue.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

And I no longer enjoy films that are an experience but ultimately tell a shitty story.

 

Then you must also hate most superhero movies as I do. Welcome!

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I'm thinking more about it, perhaps AQP was a slight victim of over hyping. I guess I could've misinterpreted the hype of "omg how brave to be almost a silent movie" to mean it was also a well told story.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...