Jump to content

A H L Discussion


Recommended Posts

And to be clear, you can Toewes rule call up ANY player on your farm if you choose to. He doesn't have to have played the amount of games that creates a forced Toewes rule call up. You can draft Rasmus Dahlin, for example, and make him a Toewes rule call up immediately.

 

That's a change from last year. I lost $3 in cap space and a year of free use for both Colin White and Jayce Hawryluk. Now, if you take the bold risk of calling up a player early (more of what we want) you don't get double punished if he doesn't actually pan out and play in the NHL.

 

What am I missing?

 

Why would you do that? You can call up anybody you want for October and then make the decision whether or not to keep them.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 20.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FCP Bob

    3208

  • Zach6668

    3141

  • digitalmonkey

    2812

  • serge

    2602

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

and sorry about not having everything up to date yet contract wise. I'll be working on that the next couple days and will have it all done hopefully before the weekend but if not over the weekend for

Unlike other predictions, these are meant to insult and offend both finalists.   #1 Eddie Shack Conference vs #1 Tiger Williams Conference   Steelheads (56-25-1) +/- 167 vs Big M (52-25-5) +/-

AHL GM's European Summit 2015 was a blast! Whalers really embraced the culture....     As per tradition of trades whenever owners cross paths... Whalers and Swackers have agreed to swap .25 both

Posted Images

And to be clear, you can Toewes rule call up ANY player on your farm if you choose to. He doesn't have to have played the amount of games that creates a forced Toewes rule call up. You can draft Rasmus Dahlin, for example, and make him a Toewes rule call up immediately.

 

That's a change from last year. I lost $3 in cap space and a year of free use for both Colin White and Jayce Hawryluk. Now, if you take the bold risk of calling up a player early (more of what we want) you don't get double punished if he doesn't actually pan out and play in the NHL.

 

no, to designate somebody as a Toews Rule player they have to be on your farm before the 2018 draft. You can't draft somebody and then Toews them to create room for another draft pick. You can call them up to your active roster in Oct and keep your option open to send them back to the farm if they get injured or sent back to Junior etc so that you don't want to keep them up all year.

 

Both the guys you called up you could have designated as Toews Rule players and saved that money to use at the auction. You wouldn't have burned their "free" year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The advantage of Toews'ing a player would be to open up a spot on your farm so you can make a draft pick, right?

 

That makes sense to me now. Wish I could have done that a few years ago. I'd be one year behind where I am now in terms of contracts for Mark Stone and ... maybe someone else? Toffoli maybe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have:

Gothic/ravens 2019 1st rd pick

Ravens 2019 1st rd pick

Underdogs 2019 1st rd pick

 

 

 

 

I'm trying to figure out who owns which picks in the 2018 draft. If you see something that you think/know is incorrect please post.

 

Round 1

1. Ingmen

2. Broadway

3. Greaseballs

4. Cheap Thieves

5. Eagles

6. Steelheads

7. Winning Combo

8. Puck Warfare > Ingmen

9. Shooters > Cheap Thieves

10. Mustangs

11. Magically Delicious > Puck Warfare > Ingmen

12. Underdogs > Ingmen

13. PK Dealers > Broadway

14. Swackers > Winning Combo

15. Whalers > Broadway

16. Red Ravens

17. Big Ms

18. Shortstackers > Shooters

19. Canadian Gothic > Red Ravens

20. Shoot Loose

 

Round 2

21. Cheap Thieves

22. Greaseballs

23. Ingmen

24. Eagles

25. Broadway

26. Steelheads

27. Winning Combo

28. Puck Warfare

29. Shooters

30. Mustangs > Broadway

31. Magically Delicious

32. Underdogs > Puck Warfare

33. PK Dealers > Eagles

34. Swackers

35. Whalers > Cheap Thieves

36. Red Ravens

37. Big Ms

38. Shortstackers

39. Canadian Gothic > Red Ravens

40. Shoot Loose

 

Round 3

41. Cheap Thieves

42. Greaseballs

43. Ingmen

44. Eagles

45. Broadway

46. Steelheads

47. Winning Combo > Swackers

48. Puck Warfare > Underdogs

49. Shooters

50. Mustangs > Shooters > Shortstackers

51. Magically Delicious

52. Underdogs > Shoot Loose

53. PK Dealers

54. Swackers

55. Whalers

56. Red Ravens

57. Big Ms

58. Shortstackers

59. Canadian Gothic > Winning Combo

60. Shoot Loose

 

Round 4

61. Cheap Thieves

62. Greaseballs

63. Ingmen > Canadian Gothic

64. Eagles

65. Broadway > Magically Delicious

66. Steelheads > Whalers > Eagles

67. Winning Combo > Canadian Gothic

68. Puck Warfare > Shoot Loose

69. Shooters > Shoot Loose

70. Mustangs > Shooters

71. Magically Delicious

72. Underdogs > Whalers

73. PK Dealers > Eagles

74. Swackers > Puck Warfare

75. Whalers > Broadway

76. Red Ravens

77. Big Ms

78. Shortstackers > Canadian Gothic

79. Canadian Gothic > PK Dealers

80. Shoot Loose

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The advantage of Toews'ing a player would be to open up a spot on your farm so you can make a draft pick, right?

 

That makes sense to me now. Wish I could have done that a few years ago. I'd be one year behind where I am now in terms of contracts for Mark Stone and ... maybe someone else? Toffoli maybe.

 

the only advantage to designating a player as a Toew Rule player is to open up an additional spot to make a draft pick with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Game 3 Tuesday March 6th Results

 

Shack Conference

 

Championship Playoffs

 

#1 Shoot Loose 1.0

#4 Underdogs 2.0

Underdogs Lead Series 2-1

 

#2 Canadian Gothic 1.0

#3 Red Ravens 8.5

Canadian Gothic Lead Series 2-1

 

Reject Cup Playoffs

 

#7 Puck Warfare 1.5

#8 Winning Combination 4.0

Winning Combination Lead Series 2-1

 

Williams Conference

 

Championship Playoffs

 

#1 Shortstackers 5.0

#4 Whalers 0.0

Shortstackers Lead Series 2-1

 

#2 Swackers 3.0

#3 Big M's 5.0

Swackers Lead Series 2-1

 

Reject Cup Playoffs

 

#7 Broadway 2.0

#9 Ingmen 3.0

Ingmen Lead Series 2-1

Link to post
Share on other sites

The advantage of Toews'ing a player would be to open up a spot on your farm so you can make a draft pick, right?

 

That makes sense to me now. Wish I could have done that a few years ago. I'd be one year behind where I am now in terms of contracts for Mark Stone and ... maybe someone else? Toffoli maybe.

 

Yeah it's all about being able to carry more prospects where slots on your team are less valuable than slots on your farm. For me, I want as many prospects as possible so rather than dump them, I called up a couple way early. Sucks to waste a year of eligibility to keep them longer, but a bad team should want as many chances to develop a star player as it can get.

 

I expect to call up 4 players next year who will HOPEFULLY be in the NHL.

Roope Hintz

Jonathan Dahlen

Brett Howden

Mitchell Stephens

Link to post
Share on other sites

See, allowing this kind of flexibility is good for the league, IMHO. We need to allow GMs to GM, rather than strip away their ability to make decisions on certain things. This is a good example. For me, because of my specific situation, I made the decision to keep Barzal down this year and next. Maybe not having him cost me a regular season title? It'll hurt me next year, but I still get him for October and the playoffs, and I just can't afford another $3.00, even at an Aho salary for the next 3 years.

 

But, back when I had cash but no room on my farm, I was able to call up my cheaper prospects, which I believe I did with Mark Stone, and likely cheaper guys like Toffoli, before they became NHL stars.

 

It's good to let GMs GM and make their own managerial decisions rather than forcing their hand. We've built in some necessary restrictions, but it shouldn't go much further, if at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, I promoted Stone, Toffoli, and Zucker in the summer of 2014... before the auction, so they counted against my cap, but I could make my draft picks. With the Toews rule modification, I can Toews them and not lose that $3.00 (combined). That's a good change.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, I promoted Stone, Toffoli, and Zucker in the summer of 2014... before the auction, so they counted against my cap, but I could make my draft picks. With the Toews rule modification, I can Toews them and not lose that $3.00 (combined). That's a good change.

 

Correct. I burned $3.00 in cap space also calling up White and Hawryluk. Also burned a year of their eligibility. The goal is to have MORE young players called up, so this change is a way to at the very least, not cost you cap room at the draft if you take the very risky approach of calling up a farm player early. You shouldn't be punished for taking chances like that. The change was Bob's idea and it's definitely a positive one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Game 4 Thursday March 8th Results

 

Shack Conference

 

Championship Playoffs

 

#1 Shoot Loose 2.5

#4 Underdogs 0.5

Series Is Tied 2-2

 

#2 Canadian Gothic 2.0

#3 Red Ravens 1.0

Canadian Gothic Lead Series 3-1

 

Reject Cup Playoffs

 

#7 Puck Warfare 5.5

#8 Winning Combination 1.0

Series Is Tied 2-2

 

Williams Conference

 

Championship Playoffs

 

#1 Shortstackers 3.5

#4 Whalers 4.5

Series Is Tied 2-2

 

#2 Swackers 7.0

#3 Big M's -1.0

Swackers Lead Series 3-1

 

Reject Cup Playoffs

 

#7 Broadway 1.0

#9 Ingmen 0.5

Series Is Tied 2-2

Link to post
Share on other sites

Game 5 Saturday March 10th Results

 

Shack Conference

 

Championship Playoffs

 

#1 Shoot Loose 6.0

#4 Underdogs 4.0

Shoot Loose Lead Series 3-2

 

#2 Canadian Gothic 3.0

#3 Red Ravens 0.5

Canadian Gothic Win Series 4-1

 

Reject Cup Playoffs

 

#7 Puck Warfare 4.5

#8 Winning Combination 2.0

Puck Warfare Lead Series 3-2

 

Williams Conference

 

Championship Playoffs

 

#1 Shortstackers 0.0

#4 Whalers -1.0

Shortstackers Lead Series 3-2

 

#2 Swackers 0.5

#3 Big M's 5.5

Swackers Lead Series 3-2

 

Reject Cup Playoffs

 

#7 Broadway 1.5 OT Win

#9 Ingmen 1.5

Broadway Lead Series 3-2

Link to post
Share on other sites

Game 6 Monday March 12th Results

 

Shack Conference

 

Championship Playoffs

 

#1 Shoot Loose -1.0

#4 Underdogs 3.5

Series Is Tied 3-3

 

Reject Cup Playoffs

 

#7 Puck Warfare 1.5

#8 Winning Combination 0.5

Puck Warfare Win Series 4-2

 

Williams Conference

 

Championship Playoffs

 

#1 Shortstackers 3.5

#4 Whalers 7.0

Series Is Tied 3-3

 

#2 Swackers 6.0

#3 Big M's 0.5

Swackers Win Series 4-2

 

Reject Cup Playoffs

 

#7 Broadway 0.5

#9 Ingmen -2.0

Broadway Win Series 4-2

Link to post
Share on other sites

Game 7 Tuesday March 13th Results

 

Shack Conference

 

Championship Playoffs

 

#1 Shoot Loose 4.5

#4 Underdogs -0.5

Shoot Loose Win Series 4-3

 

Williams Conference

 

Championship Playoffs

 

#1 Shortstackers 3.5

#4 Whalers 3.0

Shortstackers Win Series 4-3

Link to post
Share on other sites

Championship Semi Finals

 

#1 Shoot Loose vs #2 Canadian Gothic

 

#1 Shortstackers vs #2 Swackers

 

Reject Cup Finals

 

#7 Puck Warfare vs #7 Broadway

 

Game Dates

 

2018-03-15

2018-03-16

2018-03-17

2018-03-18

2018-03-20

2018-03-22

2018-03-24

Link to post
Share on other sites

What did I do to deserve the Serge bump?

 

Nothing personal. You can’t win a championship before me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...