Karrol Lina 0 Posted September 22, 2009 Share Posted September 22, 2009 The problem really isnt with all news channels it really is a problem with us, as citizans of this country that we have our heads too far up our butts to think for ourselves. We have all been fighting for our political party to succeed, arguing that one is right and one is wrong. Who is right when everything has been all handled so obviously wrong? We can argue that our preferred party is the superior one, the correct one and the financially responsible one. Well I sure have had my thoughts and I still do, but who really is to say that my opinion is any better than someone elses, let alone the correct one. Seriously though, it runs so much deeper than our current political situation. The majority of our country has lost hope. So many have given up on personal responsibility. Our once strong and independent people now look to an imaginary source of comfort. I am ashamed and heartbroken by the spirit that has been sucked out of our people. What happened to the land of the free and the home of the brave, it is forgotten. I am still hoping that the despair and loss of self preservation will be lifted and we can once can all once again learn to stand on our own two feet. Gone are the concepts of taking care of others, so many now expecting the government to do this. When we could be helping others individually, instead of all fighting about which way the government should step in. What happened to our dreams, the countries sense of pride and entrepreneurship? My parents came to this country based on an ideal of what the United States of America represented. They were in search of the path of self improvement and achievement. Yes, we all have failed; the buy now, pay later buisness plan that so many corporations and individuals have based their lives on is an epic fail. Certainly there must be a way to fix this, I dont see any ideas from either party that does really address the core of the problem. Instead they are just providing band-aids, which will eventually fall off. So really instead of being angry at the government, for what we feel is wrong, and relying on our television programing to inform us. Wouldnt it be better to work together to solve the bigger issues. By being angry with our government we are allowing ourselves to be dependent. Of course, it will never change, and it is very, very sad that a very large portion of us can only see one view or side of things, instead of embracing concepts and showing empathy to others. It is really time to send the irresponsible politicians home, it seems like so many, are so out of touch with reality that they are useless to our country's needs. Unfortunatly none of this can happen, if we really truly cant see past the news or the political party we are registered under. Okay now, I know this extended way beyond which news station is the most accurate, but it just drives me crazy that we all and I am including myself here, just firmly believe that our own interpretation, of a fact, is the correct one. Link to post Share on other sites
Pot Odds RAC 23 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 The problem really isnt with all news channels it really is a problem with us, as citizans of this country that we have our heads too far up our butts to think for ourselves. We have all been fighting for our political party to succeed, arguing that one is right and one is wrong. Who is right when everything has been all handled so obviously wrong? We can argue that our preferred party is the superior one, the correct one and the financially responsible one. Well I sure have had my thoughts and I still do, but who really is to say that my opinion is any better than someone elses, let alone the correct one. Seriously though, it runs so much deeper than our current political situation. The majority of our country has lost hope. So many have given up on personal responsibility. Our once strong and independent people now look to an imaginary source of comfort. I am ashamed and heartbroken by the spirit that has been sucked out of our people. What happened to the land of the free and the home of the brave, it is forgotten. I am still hoping that the despair and loss of self preservation will be lifted and we can once can all once again learn to stand on our own two feet. Gone are the concepts of taking care of others, so many now expecting the government to do this. When we could be helping others individually, instead of all fighting about which way the government should step in. What happened to our dreams, the countries sense of pride and entrepreneurship? My parents came to this country based on an ideal of what the United States of America represented. They were in search of the path of self improvement and achievement. Yes, we all have failed; the buy now, pay later buisness plan that so many corporations and individuals have based their lives on is an epic fail. Certainly there must be a way to fix this, I dont see any ideas from either party that does really address the core of the problem. Instead they are just providing band-aids, which will eventually fall off. So really instead of being angry at the government, for what we feel is wrong, and relying on our television programing to inform us. Wouldnt it be better to work together to solve the bigger issues. By being angry with our government we are allowing ourselves to be dependent. Of course, it will never change, and it is very, very sad that a very large portion of us can only see one view or side of things, instead of embracing concepts and showing empathy to others. It is really time to send the irresponsible politicians home, it seems like so many, are so out of touch with reality that they are useless to our country's needs. Unfortunatly none of this can happen, if we really truly cant see past the news or the political party we are registered under. Okay now, I know this extended way beyond which news station is the most accurate, but it just drives me crazy that we all and I am including myself here, just firmly believe that our own interpretation, of a fact, is the correct one.It went with the Country's sense of Grammar.Seriously though, what's the point in having an Opinion if you don't think you're right? Link to post Share on other sites
LongLiveYorke 38 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 It went with the Country's sense of Grammar.It also went out with confusing issues of spelling with issues of grammar. Link to post Share on other sites
Dagata 0 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 I listen to Rush often, heard this show, heard what he said and what other are reporting he said.The two things are not equal.But Rush is the perfect barometer to test if a person is willing to think for themselves or just listen to their political side tell them what to think.I have listened to Rush for over 15 years, he speaks for 3 hours a day, almost every work day, (for a paltry $50,000 an hour)Yet someone reports one sound bite taken out of context or meaning and try to pigeon hole Rush into some caricature that doesn't exist. You have to be crazy to believe that a person like that would have the largest audience in the history of radio for over a decade. But if you are cool thinking that you 'know' Rush after listening to a few reports by people that don't like him...then I guess you aren't open to experiencing one of the best 3 hours in radio everyday.I would think that as a person in the limelight of society, you should know better than most that just because there is a story or report about a person and what he supposedly said, it doesn't make it true. If I wanted to show someone just a few snippets of your blogs, I can make you look like anything I want, from racist to nazi to homophobe to Hellmuth lover.That rat bastard Rush is nazi, his show airs at like noon around here. I can't wake up that early!But I like him when I do get a chance to hear him Link to post Share on other sites
Pot Odds RAC 23 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 It also went out with confusing issues of spelling with issues of grammar.I thought Spelling was a subset of the rules of Grammar, not so? I freely admit I could be ignorant on this.But I am pretty certain that the confusion of "countries" vs. "country's" in the sentence "What happened to our dreams, the countries sense of pride and entrepreneurship?" is a mistake in grammar not just spelling.Again, I'm not the best "Grammar Cop" I was just being a nit. Link to post Share on other sites
Dagata 0 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not, but I guess I have two responses: First, I was mostly trying to be funny (the operative word being 'trying'), and second, I dare you to find a black person anywhere at that protest!I was somewhat being sarcastic, and while I don't really know your real standing on this, but there does seem to be quite a bit of liberals who throw the race card very quickly at these protests. "Hey look at that protest, its all white people, hmm they must be racist to obama" Now i'm anti-protest so I wasn't there, but I bet that there was no rule that said "White only protest"It's stupid to suggest they had such a rule, but so many people for some reason decided that in order for white people to protest, we have to get approval by black people.However if people decide that we DO require approval in order to protest, I think we got some left over credit from this guy that we can use. Link to post Share on other sites
timwakefield 68 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-augu...eck-s-operationGreat video, thanks. Also, lol @ the tags: Intro, Rachel McAdams, movies, time travel, dinosaurs, Glenn Beck, health, surgery, asses Link to post Share on other sites
timwakefield 68 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 I was somewhat being sarcastic, and while I don't really know your real standing on this, but there does seem to be quite a bit of liberals who throw the race card very quickly at these protests. "Hey look at that protest, its all white people, hmm they must be racist to obama"Yeah but the thing is, a lot of the signs were more than slightly racist. Things like "Obama For President Of Kenya" are extremely racist. There's really no other interpretation of a sign like that. He's black, so he should be President of a country in Africa (and Kenya because his father was Kenyan, I assume). So when people are throwing around racist slogans and feelings, it makes the whiteness of the crowd stand out. I'm not getting my panties all up in a bunch over some good ol' fashioned racism, just saying that that's why I made all the comments about the whiteness. P.S. You did get a win though, because I dared you to find a black person at the rally and you did . A goddam scary one too. [Note, that sentence sounds super-racist]. Seriously though, that's a fake gun, right? Link to post Share on other sites
Pot Odds RAC 23 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 Yeah but the thing is, a lot of the signs were more than slightly racist. Things like "Obama For President Of Kenya" are extremely racist. There's really no other interpretation of a sign like that. He's black, so he should be President of a country in Africa (and Kenya because his father was Kenyan, I assume). So when people are throwing around racist slogans and feelings, it makes the whiteness of the crowd stand out.P.S. You did get a win though, because I dared you to find a black person at the rally and you did . A goddam scary one too. [Note, that sentence sounds super-racist]. Seriously though, that's a fake gun, right? Not fake. http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/08/17/oba...iref=newssearchMan carries assault rifle to Obama protest -- and it's legal PHOENIX, Arizona (CNN) -- A man toting an assault rifle was among a dozen protesters carrying weapons while demonstrating outside President Obama's speech to veterans on Monday, but no laws were broken. It was the second instance in recent days in which weapons have been seen near presidential events... Link to post Share on other sites
timwakefield 68 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 Not fake.Your link was busted, but I found it:http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/08/17/obama.protest.rifle/So, I win! He wasn't in DC! Just kidding. I don't even know what to say about that story. Well, I guess I have a few things. I won't even comment on the law.First, "Hill said officers explained the law to some people who were upset about the presence of weapons at the protest." I mean, yeah. Why would you do something like that with the potential to scare a lot of people or even start a panic?Second, if your goal is to land on as many government watch-lists as possible, this is probably a pretty good way of achieving that. Link to post Share on other sites
Karrol Lina 0 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 It went with the Country's sense of Grammar.Seriously though, what's the point in having an Opinion if you don't think you're right?Lol, yes there are some errors in my post. Spell check would be a good thing before hitting reply. Link to post Share on other sites
akoff 0 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 Things like "Obama For President Of Kenya" are extremely racist. There's really no other interpretation of a sign like that. He's black, so he should be President of a country in Africa (and Kenya because his father was Kenyan, I assume).You you just gave one. his father is Kenyan....get it?? little slow on that one eh. Link to post Share on other sites
Zealous Donkey 0 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 I listen to Rush often, heard this show, heard what he said and what other are reporting he said.The two things are not equal.But Rush is the perfect barometer to test if a person is willing to think for themselves or just listen to their political side tell them what to think.I have listened to Rush for over 15 years, he speaks for 3 hours a day, almost every work day, (for a paltry $50,000 an hour)Yet someone reports one sound bite taken out of context or meaning and try to pigeon hole Rush into some caricature that doesn't exist. You have to be crazy to believe that a person like that would have the largest audience in the history of radio for over a decade. But if you are cool thinking that you 'know' Rush after listening to a few reports by people that don't like him...then I guess you aren't open to experiencing one of the best 3 hours in radio everyday.I would think that as a person in the limelight of society, you should know better than most that just because there is a story or report about a person and what he supposedly said, it doesn't make it true. If I wanted to show someone just a few snippets of your blogs, I can make you look like anything I want, from racist to nazi to homophobe to Hellmuth lover.I was going to comment on Daniel's post, but you do a good job here. The quote Daniel posted was the opposite of the point Rush was making. Rush was simply following the exact same logic Obama supporters, and most liberal politicians in Washington follow when they make most of their accusations of racism. I did hear most of this, and, correct me if I am wrong but I believe Rush was specifically mirroring the same tone as an article on race in either time or newsweek when he made the statement he made, in any event Daniel's posting of it as he did was a gross mischaracterization. Link to post Share on other sites
Zealous Donkey 0 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 I was somewhat being sarcastic, and while I don't really know your real standing on this, but there does seem to be quite a bit of liberals who throw the race card very quickly at these protests. "Hey look at that protest, its all white people, hmm they must be racist to obama" Now i'm anti-protest so I wasn't there, but I bet that there was no rule that said "White only protest"It's stupid to suggest they had such a rule, but so many people for some reason decided that in order for white people to protest, we have to get approval by black people.However if people decide that we DO require approval in order to protest, I think we got some left over credit from this guy that we can use.and these are the same people that have absolutely no problem whatsoever with the Church Obama attended for the last 20 years. Link to post Share on other sites
LongLiveYorke 38 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 I thought Spelling was a subset of the rules of Grammar, not so? I freely admit I could be ignorant on this.I was just joking really.(But, to me, grammar refers to sentence structure and spelling is, well, just spelling. There are blurred lines where an apostrophe or a type of pluralization can turn a spelling mistake into one of grammar.) Link to post Share on other sites
Balloon guy 158 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 I, was, just joking, really.(But, to me, grammar, refers to sentence structure, spelling, is, well, just spelling. There are blurred lines, where an apostrophe, or a type of pluralization, can turn a spelling mistake, into one of grammar.)fyg Link to post Share on other sites
LongLiveYorke 38 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 fygas;ldfhasjfWEJAEJLAJFAJLADSL'Jkasdf;kasdflkadsfIt's like nails on a chalkboard. This is what happens when you go to a snotty prep school in Connecticut. That's it. I'm going to find my old copy of English Grammar and Composition, make myself a cup of coffee, and take a heavenly journey through hundreds of pages of well-organized, rigid rules and regulations. Link to post Share on other sites
ahosang 0 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 ... Link to post Share on other sites
SAM_Hard8 50 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 I listen to Rush often, heard this show, heard what he said and what other are reporting he said.The two things are not equal.But Rush is the perfect barometer to test if a person is willing to think for themselves or just listen to their political side tell them what to think.I have listened to Rush for over 15 years, he speaks for 3 hours a day, almost every work day, (for a paltry $50,000 an hour)Yet someone reports one sound bite taken out of context or meaning and try to pigeon hole Rush into some caricature that doesn't exist. You have to be crazy to believe that a person like that would have the largest audience in the history of radio for over a decade. But if you are cool thinking that you 'know' Rush after listening to a few reports by people that don't like him...then I guess you aren't open to experiencing one of the best 3 hours in radio everyday.I would think that as a person in the limelight of society, you should know better than most that just because there is a story or report about a person and what he supposedly said, it doesn't make it true. If I wanted to show someone just a few snippets of your blogs, I can make you look like anything I want, from racist to nazi to homophobe to Hellmuth lover.exactly correct!Scares me that someone is so willing to hate others based on things reported instead of listening for themselves. That quote DN is a perfect example.Very disappointed in our boy. Link to post Share on other sites
Flushgarden 0 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 lol I think Glenn Beck might get some heat for what happened on his show today.It appeared that he threw a live frog into boiling water expecting it to immediately jump out...however the frog did not jump out. He then said it was fake...but I'm pretty sure I saw frogs moving in the box when he reached in to get one. Link to post Share on other sites
timwakefield 68 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 lol I think Glenn Beck might get some heat for what happened on his show today.It appeared that he threw a live frog into boiling water expecting it to immediately jump out...however the frog did not jump out. He then said it was fake...but I'm pretty sure I saw frogs moving in the box when he reached in to get one.What the hell - was this some misguided science experiment gone wrong or what? I thought his show was just talking. Now he's murdering frogs?! Link to post Share on other sites
Zealous Donkey 0 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 lol I think Glenn Beck might get some heat for what happened on his show today.It appeared that he threw a live frog into boiling water expecting it to immediately jump out...however the frog did not jump out. He then said it was fake...but I'm pretty sure I saw frogs moving in the box when he reached in to get one.I agree with Beck sometimes, but I do think he could benefit from some Thorazine and a little time in a straitjacket. Link to post Share on other sites
Flushgarden 0 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 What the hell - was this some misguided science experiment gone wrong or what? I thought his show was just talking. Now he's murdering frogs?!Ok nevermind. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9nVpO1DvfkIf you watch when he's grabbing a frog you'll see that the one he got jumped out of his hand before he took it out of the container. He didn't actually throw anything in the water.It's funny how this person that posted the video cut the video off right before he said "forget about the frog it was fake". This person clearly isn't interested in the truth and only wants to hurt Beck.He may be a bit crazy but he's not stupid. Link to post Share on other sites
JoeyJoJo 18 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 Can't. Stop. Laughing. Link to post Share on other sites
Sal Paradise 57 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 wow. first experience with glenn beck. doooon't think I'll be watching him anymore.also, NOBODY should listen to a person who would wear jeans like that. jesus. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now