Very Odd

[Kuge 0]

Just food for thought, very weird with the "Imalucksac".Goin on right now in the 5r on stars.Possible they are just related and from the same city? Similar stats on OPR.

[ThePhoenix88 0]

Maybe it was an error? Either way you should send this to support. By the way your avatar is pimp.

[Freddec 0]

odd

[litlebullet 0]

if he is multi-accounting, he does it really well

[Kuge 0]

Heh...well they both are 8th and 31st in the yearly TLB...I'm just confused at this point.

[Cappy37 0]

That's a bad beat for those left in it: having to go against 2 luckboxes in one tourney.

[Kuge 0]

:/ They do think similar...but not exactly alike...hehPokerStars Game #12330631492: Tournament #61825973, $5.00+$0.50 Hold'em No Limit - Level XXV (20000/40000) - 2007/09/29 - 00:43:21 (ET)Table '61825973 258' 9-max Seat #7 is the buttonSeat 2: jabmus (656542 in chips) Seat 3: ImaLucSac (392587 in chips) Seat 4: BlueAnandak (1169262 in chips) Seat 5: sonnybonesx. (302712 in chips) Seat 6: IPFT (489555 in chips) Seat 7: Huib1 (929802 in chips) Seat 8: flopnutset (330894 in chips) Seat 9: BeeJall (919610 in chips) jabmus: posts the ante 4000ImaLucSac: posts the ante 4000BlueAnandak: posts the ante 4000sonnybonesx.: posts the ante 4000IPFT: posts the ante 4000Huib1: posts the ante 4000flopnutset: posts the ante 4000BeeJall: posts the ante 4000flopnutset: posts small blind 20000BeeJall: posts big blind 40000*** HOLE CARDS ***jabmus: folds ImaLucSac: raises 61001 to 101001BlueAnandak: folds sonnybonesx.: folds IPFT: calls 101001Huib1: folds flopnutset: folds BeeJall: folds *** FLOP *** [Ts Kh 3d]ImaLucSac: checks IPFT: bets 120000ImaLucSac: raises 167586 to 287586 and is all-inIPFT: calls 167586*** TURN *** [Ts Kh 3d] [6c]*** RIVER *** [Ts Kh 3d 6c] [5c]*** SHOW DOWN ***ImaLucSac: shows [Ah Ks] (a pair of Kings)IPFT: shows [Ac Jh] (high card Ace)ImaLucSac collected 869174 from pot*** SUMMARY ***Total pot 869174 | Rake 0 Board [Ts Kh 3d 6c 5c]Seat 2: jabmus folded before Flop (didn't bet)Seat 3: ImaLucSac showed [Ah Ks] and won (869174) with a pair of KingsSeat 4: BlueAnandak folded before Flop (didn't bet)Seat 5: sonnybonesx. folded before Flop (didn't bet)Seat 6: IPFT showed [Ac Jh] and lost with high card AceSeat 7: Huib1 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)Seat 8: flopnutset (small blind) folded before FlopSeat 9: BeeJall (big blind) folded before FlopPokerStars Game #12330684069: Tournament #61825973, $5.00+$0.50 Hold'em No Limit - Level XXV (20000/40000) - 2007/09/29 - 00:47:11 (ET)Table '61825973 35' 9-max Seat #3 is the buttonSeat 1: meanplaya (1488366 in chips) Seat 2: longhair 99 (399608 in chips) Seat 3: Mastercuter (1341700 in chips) Seat 4: Lox 11 (409840 in chips) Seat 6: donis1 (2337502 in chips) Seat 7: BustinBob (777096 in chips) Seat 8: ImaLuckSac (646464 in chips) Seat 9: xjan1 (191460 in chips) meanplaya: posts the ante 4000longhair 99: posts the ante 4000Mastercuter: posts the ante 4000Lox 11: posts the ante 4000donis1: posts the ante 4000BustinBob: posts the ante 4000ImaLuckSac: posts the ante 4000xjan1: posts the ante 4000Lox 11: posts small blind 20000donis1: posts big blind 40000*** HOLE CARDS ***BustinBob: folds ImaLuckSac: raises 61000 to 101000xjan1: raises 86460 to 187460 and is all-inmeanplaya: calls 187460longhair 99: folds Mastercuter: folds Lox 11: folds donis1: folds ImaLuckSac: raises 455004 to 642464 and is all-inmeanplaya: folds *** FLOP *** [2h Kc 9s]*** TURN *** [2h Kc 9s] [Th]*** RIVER *** [2h Kc 9s Th] [Qc]*** SHOW DOWN ***ImaLuckSac: shows [Kd Ah] (a pair of Kings)xjan1: shows [Js Ac] (a straight, Ten to Ace)xjan1 collected 654380 from pot*** SUMMARY ***Total pot 654380 | Rake 0 Board [2h Kc 9s Th Qc]Seat 1: meanplaya folded before FlopSeat 2: longhair 99 folded before Flop (didn't bet)Seat 3: Mastercuter (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)Seat 4: Lox 11 (small blind) folded before FlopSeat 6: donis1 (big blind) folded before FlopSeat 7: BustinBob folded before Flop (didn't bet)Seat 8: ImaLuckSac showed [Kd Ah] and lost with a pair of KingsSeat 9: xjan1 showed [Js Ac] and won (654380) with a straight, Ten to Ace

[donk4life 34]

very strange

[James D 0]

I actually think I may have played with these two before.. it would have been a 180 player, or 45 SNG.If it was not these, then it was exactly the same situation with two people from the same city, with almost the same name (it was over a year ago, so I can't be sure that it was this name).They said they were father and son, in chat, and often played in the same tourney.

[Kuge 0]

I actually think I may have played with these two before.. it would have been a 180 player, or 45 SNG.If it was not these, then it was exactly the same situation with two people from the same city, with almost the same name (it was over a year ago, so I can't be sure that it was this name).They said they were father and son, in chat, and often played in the same tourney.

Funny you mention that...chuckspears [observer]: HEY LUCSAC WAS THAT YOUR TWIN BROTHER WHO WENT OUT ON THE OTHER TABLEImaLucSac: just a good friend :icon_confused:Edit: More chatImaLucSac: Good thing hes 7th in chips in the nightlychuckspears [observer]: NIGHTLY WHATImaLucSac: Look on p5s.comImaLuckSac [observer]: shameless self promotionImaLuckSac [observer]: lolImaLucSac: Nightly 100k

[ThePhoenix88 0]

You going to send it to PStars Support?

[GWCGWC 83]

I've played with them both in a SNG, it was kind of strange.

[Kuge 0]

Well, they both do seem like different accounts...and it's not like they were at the same table so collusion is out of the question...This is just confusing.

[James D 0]

Edit: More chatImaLucSac: Good thing hes 7th in chips in the nightlychuckspears [observer]: NIGHTLY WHATImaLucSac: Look on p5s.comImaLuckSac [observer]: shameless self promotionImaLuckSac [observer]: lolImaLucSac: Nightly 100k

lol @ him saying 'he's 7th in chips'... then saying 'self promotion'.so who's he talking about?

[Kuge 0]

lol @ him saying 'he's 7th in chips'... then saying 'self promotion'.so who's he talking about?

You just blew my mind...

[James D 0]

ballsdeep27 [observer]: whats with all the luck sacs ?jamjed [observer]: yeah what about a lucky taint?pfcpoker_UK [observer]: lucksac do u have aimImaLucSac: Just have msnpfcpoker_UK [observer]: does other lucksacImaLuckSac [observer]: just talk to devinr12pfcpoker_UK [observer]: whyImaLuckSac [observer]: he has aimImaLuckSac [observer]: he lives with usWell, they live together, so obviously could (i.e - do) have the ability to collude if they're on laptops etc... but let's be honest, that type of collusion must be pretty rife online anyway.

[XXEddie 0]

As strange as i seemsboth Lucsac's are good players, and if they were gonna collude, I dont think they would make it so obvious

[James D 0]

As strange as i seemsboth Lucsac's are good players, and if they were gonna collude, I dont think they would make it so obvious

of course they do. you think if they are in the same tournament, in the same house next to each other, they won't show each other their hands and stuff?

[XXEddie 0]

of course they do. you think if they are in the same tournament, in the same house next to each other, they won't show each other their hands and stuff?

meh, its not gtd either wayim just sayin...

[JustLikeNegs 1]

i asked him a couple nights ago about this, he said he couldnt explain it as he was 9 tabling but too look on p5's and its all explained on there. He must get so many people asking him the same question. I think its legit, he mentioned that stars had okayed it.

[vbnautilus 48]

Here is the pocketfives thread:http://www.pocketfives.com/2896BD69-4118-4...CC91422562.aspxcomputerb says "They are friends and have cleared it with the site."edit: found another threadhttp://www.pocketfives.com/8B203FF5-D252-4...BCB534BD30.aspxImaLuckSac and I are old college roomates. The reason we play in a lot of the same events is that we have very similar bankrolls, thus we play the same events. Pokerstars has looked into this as well and we have explained things to customer support, Im sure they keep an eye on us anyway. Hopefully that clears things up for you guy

[no not baxter 0]

of course they do. you think if they are in the same tournament, in the same house next to each other, they won't show each other their hands and stuff?

ummmm...some people have ethics, morals, etc. Do not just assume they are going to cheat. Gibler and I were playing the sunday warmup a foot away from each other on the same couch and got placed at the same table. We got into a big pot and did not tell each other our cards. He busted me with TT<JJ. Ya, some people are going to cheat, but a lot of people know what the right thing to do is.

[gibler321 1]

ummmm...some people have ethics, morals, etc. Do not just assume they are going to cheat. Gibler and I were playing the sunday warmup a foot away from each other on the same couch and got placed at the same table. We got into a big pot and did not tell each other our cards. He busted me with TT<JJ. Ya, some people are going to cheat, but a lot of people know what the right thing to do is.

so fckin pwnt

[James D 0]

ummmm...some people have ethics, morals, etc. Do not just assume they are going to cheat. Gibler and I were playing the sunday warmup a foot away from each other on the same couch and got placed at the same table. We got into a big pot and did not tell each other our cards. He busted me with TT<JJ. Ya, some people are going to cheat, but a lot of people know what the right thing to do is.

yeah, of course... and the fact that they're playing larger entry mtts means there's less chance that they would be on the same table.Just saying that if they do happen to be at the same table together, I wouldn't rule it out if some tricky spot came up between them, on the bubble for example.Kudos to you guys for not cheating.. some are not so ethical. Having found out that these two are very good players, it is less likely that they would collude however, because it wouldn't be worth their while so much. More likely to be bad players that want to cheat in some way.

[cardcore 0]

if nothing else this is something that should be brought to stars' attention