doox 15 Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 You know, I thought he was a tool for folding before...but now that I've seen his sharkscope, I honestly think I hate him, now.Yup. I really think I do. Link to post Share on other sites
Dogpatch 2 Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 What a joke. Link to post Share on other sites
Balloon guy 158 Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 How bad of a fold was this?Jennifer Tilly just went: "What was he thinking?"That's how bad of a fold it was. Link to post Share on other sites
Killrus 0 Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 he must be a bot. thats why he folded preflop. Link to post Share on other sites
LongLiveYorke 38 Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 How bad of a fold was this?Jennifer Tilly just went: "What was he thinking?"That's how bad of a fold it was.Zing.Yeah, but from now on, since we all know how tight he plays, we'll have to respect his raises!!! Link to post Share on other sites
irishguy 14 Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 his sharkscope does say he's on tilt. Link to post Share on other sites
Dogpatch 2 Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 How bad of a fold was this?Jennifer Tilly just went: "What was he thinking?"That's how bad of a fold it was.LOL A new classic. The Open Farrell and the Tilly. Link to post Share on other sites
Merby 3 Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 his sharkscope does say he's on tilt.Damn... you beat me to it. Clearly, this is the reason for his ------------------------EV fold preflop Link to post Share on other sites
Chicago99 0 Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 Yea i got that much, so he obviously has a clue then why did he fold his shot at 100k...It's obvious. He thought that people who played the hand and lost had to pay out the 100k. It's the only explanation. Link to post Share on other sites
SCS 0 Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 Zing.Yeah, but from now on, since we all know how tight he plays, we'll have to respect his raises!!!You don't have an 18% roi and make over $30,000 playing over 5000 sngs without understanding the metagame. Link to post Share on other sites
doox 15 Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 Someone on another forum posed the idea that maybe he was underage and didn't want an investigation or too much focus on him if he had won. I'm still voting "moron" though. Link to post Share on other sites
uncooper 1 Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 Someone on another forum posed the idea that maybe he was underage and didn't want an investigation or too much focus on him if he had won. I'm still voting "moron" though.Hm, I'm not sure that is what goes through the average person's mind in the 20 seconds after being told that the next hand they play on their micro-stake table is worth 100k, but if so, then you gotta give the guy credit...I guess. No, wait. Worst fold ever. Link to post Share on other sites
BigLebowski 0 Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 Wouldn't "ship me the boom sauce" be more appropriate? Link to post Share on other sites
Jam-Fly 8 Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 I for one am going to remain raising with 83 clubs everytime Link to post Share on other sites
Jam-Fly 8 Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 Is TedForrest not the guy that thought he was #1 on the waiting list? I heard something like he wasn't even dealt in the hand or something. But if the HH is correct, then it seems as if he was dealt in Link to post Share on other sites
GWCGWC 83 Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 That's nothing, look at this lay down:PokerStars 1/2 Hold'em (10 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FCP)Preflop: Hero is MP1 with A , A . 3 folds, Hero raises, 4 folds, SB calls, BB calls.Flop: (6 SB) 8 , 3 , Q (3 players)SB bets, BB raises, Hero 3-bets, SB caps, BB calls, Hero calls.Turn: (8 BB) 6 (3 players)SB bets, BB calls, Hero folds.River: (10 BB) 5 (2 players)SB bets, BB calls.Final Pot: 12 BBSB has Ks Kd (one pair, kings). BB has Jd Qs (one pair, queens). Outcome: SB wins 12 BB. Link to post Share on other sites
loxo 0 Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 Maybe it was his wife/little brother/mother playing on his account? Someone close to him who doesn't really play just wanting to muck around a little bit. I know my wife plays on my account every now and then......she has absolutely no idea what's she's doing but doesn't risk much so it's all fun. Link to post Share on other sites
Jam-Fly 8 Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 Maybe he did so a load of internet forums would make a thread about him Link to post Share on other sites
Naps_555 0 Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 What are the chances that this was the real Ted Forrest? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_ForrestNormally i wouldnt think so, but after seeing his sharkscope, maybe it is...... Link to post Share on other sites
Aschlanser 0 Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 What are the chances that this was the real Ted Forrest? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_ForrestNormally i wouldnt think so, but after seeing his sharkscope, maybe it is......Good thing you included that link or else no one would've even known who you were talking about. Link to post Share on other sites
cwik 0 Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 What are the chances that this was the real Ted Forrest? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_ForrestNormally i wouldnt think so, but after seeing his sharkscope, maybe it is......I'm sure it is. Live games are much softer than online. The big game is about the equivalent to $40 sng's. plus it has to be him, Forrest runs spooky good. Link to post Share on other sites
loxo 0 Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 I'm sure it is. Live games are much softer than online. The big game is about the equivalent to $40 sng's. plus it has to be him, Forrest runs spooky good.You should have put a little pic of your avatar below this post, it would have fitted nicely. Link to post Share on other sites
hockey fan 0 Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 How bad of a fold was this?Jennifer Tilly just went: "What was he thinking?"That's how bad of a fold it was.Gold Link to post Share on other sites
GillFinigan 0 Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 $2.95 into a $100,000... Sure the Pot odds look OK but he must of had a good read on the winner...Great Laydown Link to post Share on other sites
Whatever 1 Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 Hm, I'm not sure that is what goes through the average person's mind in the 20 seconds after being told that the next hand they play on their micro-stake table is worth 100kActually it was more like 5 minutes. And jumped over there to watch when they announced it was a .01/.02 NL table. I'm positive he folded because he's underage playing in the U.S. and didn't want the publicity. Also - THREE of the players were goldstar accounts. I guess they were 20 tabling or whatever. I was a moron and had my poker tracker up so I couldn't do more than 5 with my craptastic computer. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now