gfdsa146 0 Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 In a live game, if someone's cards hit the muck, is anyone else at the table allowed to pick them up and look at them without sustaining a penalty? Link to post Share on other sites
KUPoker5 0 Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 In a live game, if someone's cards hit the muck, is anyone else at the table allowed to pick them up and look at them without sustaining a penalty?Once they are mucked, no one is allowed to turn them over. The dealer should have scooped those cards up and put them aside. If a penalty was not enforced on the other guy's behalf, you should atleast tell him that it's horrible table etiquette. Then of course you need to follow him to his car later... Link to post Share on other sites
sixhands 0 Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 Unless you are a certain poker player with a brown spot.If you are then you can grab them from the muck and look but ONLY if you say "Just checking" Link to post Share on other sites
bdc30 0 Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 What exact "penalty" would there be? It's bad etiquette, but really, what are you going to do about it? Link to post Share on other sites
gfdsa146 0 Posted April 4, 2007 Author Share Posted April 4, 2007 Does this rule hold for a showdown? I because in PS, you're always allowed to check what the guy mucked in the hand history Link to post Share on other sites
KUPoker5 0 Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 Does this rule hold for a showdown? I because in PS, you're always allowed to check what the guy mucked in the hand historyThat's a good question. I've wondered this too. I'm not sure if the rules state both players have to show or not. I know that if you call your opponent, he HAS to show. When I'm at the tables, I get pretty irritated when people don't flip up their hands in a showdown. I should probably look into this. Link to post Share on other sites
Dogpatch 2 Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 Does this rule hold for a showdown? I because in PS, you're always allowed to check what the guy mucked in the hand historyYou can ask to see any hand that made it to showdown. But it is bad etiquette. It's inexcusable to reach into the muck. Link to post Share on other sites
KUPoker5 0 Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 What exact "penalty" would there be? It's bad etiquette, but really, what are you going to do about it?I go by a simple rule of thumb for this. Do it once, I'll let you know it's not a cool thing to do. Do it twice, you're getting an earful. Do it three times, you get a tire iron to the windshield/legs/arms/ribs. Link to post Share on other sites
silkyjonson 1 Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 You can ask to see any hand that made it to showdown. But it is bad etiquette. It's inexcusable to reach into the muck.Even the dealers are not supposed to retrieve a hand that has hit the muck even if it made it to showdown. Not sure if that is what your saying though. Link to post Share on other sites
iowahawk09 0 Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 You can ask to see any hands that went to showdown, however, as a courtesy to your opponent, it is usually in poor taste to do so. BUT NEVER EVER, should cards be retrieved from the muck, especially by another player. Link to post Share on other sites
therescav 0 Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 its funny cause KUPoker likes to beat people up Link to post Share on other sites
KUPoker5 0 Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 its funny cause KUPoker likes to beat people up I always go to anger management after my live games. It's therapeutic, and it always makes me feel better after busting up somebody's spleen. B) Link to post Share on other sites
psujohn 0 Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 If a player at the table attempts to touch any cards other than their own or any chips in the pot the dealer should literally smack their hand. The first time they can get a smack with the dealer's hand the second time with a bat. Link to post Share on other sites
NoSup4U 0 Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 I see dealers all the time pull cards out of the muck to show at showdown when its requested by another player. A player isn't allowed to do this.The rule about seeing other players cards at showdows is in place to prevent collusion. If you suspect collusion you are allowed to see the other players cards if there is a showdown. Although players ask the dealer a lot to see the mucked cards, this is akin to saying you suspect possible collusion.I personally never do it, but I don't care if people ask to see my cards, because I know most people don't care about WHY the rule is in place, they just use it to get info on how I play.Mark Link to post Share on other sites
Balloon guy 158 Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 If a player at the table attempts to touch any cards other than their own or any chips in the pot the dealer should literally smack their hand. The first time they can get a smack with the dealer's hand the second time with a bat.You play at a Catholic casino? Link to post Share on other sites
iowahawk09 0 Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 I see dealers all the time pull cards out of the muck to show at showdown when its requested by another player. A player isn't allowed to do this.The rule about seeing other players cards at showdows is in place to prevent collusion. If you suspect collusion you are allowed to see the other players cards if there is a showdown. Although players ask the dealer a lot to see the mucked cards, this is akin to saying you suspect possible collusion.I personally never do it, but I don't care if people ask to see my cards, because I know most people don't care about WHY the rule is in place, they just use it to get info on how I play.MarkMark,I was fairly sure that you could request to see a players cards at showdown anytime. Not just if collusion is suspected. Seems to me that it wouldnt make sense to have it the way you say, since I could just claim that I think people are colluding and they would have to show me everytimeWhen someone shows down, you have a right to know what they had, while it may not be in good taste, I still think you are allowed to see them upon request. Same reason why you can see what other players muck online from the HH's.Was I misinformed? Link to post Share on other sites
NoSup4U 0 Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 Mark,I was fairly sure that you could request to see a players cards at showdown anytime. Not just if collusion is suspected. Seems to me that it wouldnt make sense to have it the way you say, since I could just claim that I think people are colluding and they would have to show me everytimeWhen someone shows down, you have a right to know what they had, while it may not be in good taste, I still think you are allowed to see them upon request. Same reason why you can see what other players muck online from the HH's.Was I misinformed?The rule allowing you to see cards at showdown was put into place specifically because this allows you to find out if players are colluding. That being said, I know that the general poker playing public feels that you just have a right to know what they had so they just ask when they want to. But that 'right' was just given because of collusion, not because the powers that be who created poker rules think you should be able to see your opponents cards.The reason you can see what players muck from the hand histories is because the online sites just took this rule and put it into place online.That being said, I don't mind at all if someone asks to see my cards, because I know they just want to know what I had. But I don't want you to know. Unfortunately, because of this rule, you get to know. But I'll still try and muck and hope you don't ask. :)Mark Link to post Share on other sites
DB10-2 0 Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 i saw phil laak reach into the muck very early in the 2005 legends of poker at the bike and show the table another player's hand, which was two aces that were good for a pretty big pot. no penalty, in fact nobody at the table, including the dealer, said a word, probably because...it was phil laak! pretty bad.i lost a lot of respect for him after seeing that move. Link to post Share on other sites
gfdsa146 0 Posted April 4, 2007 Author Share Posted April 4, 2007 speaking of laak, i remember him saying somethign to esfandiari about him constantly reaching into the muck to see his cards Link to post Share on other sites
conor_mw 0 Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 Unless you are a certain poker player with a brown spot.If you are then you can grab them from the muck and look but ONLY if you say "Just checking"LOL Annie Puke styles Link to post Share on other sites
No_Neck 0 Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 The rule allowing you to see cards at showdown was put into place specifically because this allows you to find out if players are colluding. That being said, I know that the general poker playing public feels that you just have a right to know what they had so they just ask when they want to. But that 'right' was just given because of collusion, not because the powers that be who created poker rules think you should be able to see your opponents cards.The reason you can see what players muck from the hand histories is because the online sites just took this rule and put it into place online.That being said, I don't mind at all if someone asks to see my cards, because I know they just want to know what I had. But I don't want you to know. Unfortunately, because of this rule, you get to know. But I'll still try and muck and hope you don't ask. :)Markwhen you muck just make sure you fire them in the muck so it buries the cards deep. Problem solved. Link to post Share on other sites
sixhands 0 Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 LOL Annie Puke stylesding ding ding we have a winner Link to post Share on other sites
13CARDS 0 Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 There was once a player at my poker room that thought it would be ok for him to reach into the muck and take his cards out while the dealer was distracted. He wa rewarded with 6 months "poker-free" time away from my poker room to think about whether or not it was a good idea. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now