bigguyren68 155 Posted November 5, 2016 Share Posted November 5, 2016 Interesting stat. After two periods, Habs down 8-0. Leading ice-time players Weber and Emelin both have a +/- of 0. Link to post Share on other sites
digitalmonkey 929 Posted November 5, 2016 Author Share Posted November 5, 2016 Interesting stat. After two periods, Habs down 8-0. Leading ice-time players Weber and Emelin both have a +/- of 0. 9-0 now 4 PP Goals I wonder if Montoya is gonna pull a Patrick Roy lol Link to post Share on other sites
MapleLeafs 142 Posted November 5, 2016 Share Posted November 5, 2016 How bad were the Habs tonight? Even Boone Jenner got a point. 2 Link to post Share on other sites
serge 904 Posted November 5, 2016 Share Posted November 5, 2016 How bad were the Habs tonight? Even Boone Jenner got a point. Lol this is so true..FML Maybe he should change his name to Kaitlyn? #epicfailJenner Link to post Share on other sites
digitalmonkey 929 Posted March 1, 2017 Author Share Posted March 1, 2017 I doubt it will be a line, but Shaw-Ott-Gallagher would be a PITA line. Link to post Share on other sites
Dubey 1,035 Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 Ott, Martinsen is a good start to a pretty bad 5th line. Link to post Share on other sites
gruven 530 Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 I doubt it will be a line, but Shaw-Ott-Gallagher would be a PITA line. throw emelin out there on D and you'd have the nhls 'most likely to get penalized in the first 10 seconds of a shift' champion. Link to post Share on other sites
digitalmonkey 929 Posted March 1, 2017 Author Share Posted March 1, 2017 Habs added size and improved their penalty kill, but didn't add any actual scoring talent. Davidson for Desharnais was their best trade. Benn was a good pickup who'll help the PK...and the beard. King is a decent pickup considering what it cost them. He brings experience, size and grit...all the things MB seems to value over scoring ability. Ott cost next to nothing so no risk whatsoever unless he kills a teammate in practice. Also brings grit and experience. Martinsen...the only reason for this move as far as I can see is they wanted to add size/depth/hits for this season. Link to post Share on other sites
Dubey 1,035 Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 Davidson trade is great IMO. King trade is fine. Ott isn't an NHL calibre player at this point IMO so I don't like that one. Ditto Martinsen. Indifferent on the Benn trade. I don't know much about Jordie and whether he is any good to be honest. Link to post Share on other sites
digitalmonkey 929 Posted April 13, 2017 Author Share Posted April 13, 2017 A tripping penalty 200 feet from your net with 5:40 left in the 3rd and down by a goal.... Da no no Link to post Share on other sites
bigguyren68 155 Posted April 13, 2017 Share Posted April 13, 2017 A tripping penalty 200 feet from your net with 5:40 left in the 3rd and down by a goal.... Da no no Better yet, fire the puck at refs head after he calls penalty on you.lol Link to post Share on other sites
digitalmonkey 929 Posted June 15, 2017 Author Share Posted June 15, 2017 Drouin? Wow! Link to post Share on other sites
FCP Bob 1,312 Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 Drouin? Wow! seems like a weird trade for Tampa to make but what do I know Link to post Share on other sites
Babying 613 Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 seems like a weird trade for Tampa to make but what do I know I am guessing so they can protect someone else for the expansion draft. I like drouin but what do I know too Link to post Share on other sites
Swacker Dave 89 Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 Right on... a fresh start! Bring it on. Link to post Share on other sites
digitalmonkey 929 Posted June 16, 2017 Author Share Posted June 16, 2017 seems like a weird trade for Tampa to make but what do I know They did get a very good prospect, but I think $$$$ played a big part. Let's see what Drouin gets. Link to post Share on other sites
Zach6668 513 Posted June 16, 2017 Share Posted June 16, 2017 They did get a very good prospect, but I think $$$$ played a big part. Let's see what Drouin gets. Bunch of people to re-sign, and I guess they didn't want to lose Namestnikov in the expansion draft. They won't have to protect Sergachev. Link to post Share on other sites
digitalmonkey 929 Posted June 16, 2017 Author Share Posted June 16, 2017 Anticipating a Galchenyuk for Dumba ****up by Bergevin now. Link to post Share on other sites
digitalmonkey 929 Posted June 16, 2017 Author Share Posted June 16, 2017 Bunch of people to re-sign, and I guess they didn't want to lose Namestnikov in the expansion draft. They won't have to protect Sergachev. Yup needed cash to sign Palat, Johnson, etc... Link to post Share on other sites
MapleLeafpoker 1,462 Posted June 16, 2017 Share Posted June 16, 2017 Anticipating a Galchenyuk for Dumba ****up by Bergevin now. Do you want them to trade Galch for a D, just not Dumba, or you want them to keep him for good? Personally, Id look to keep him, unless there are things in background Im not aware of. Link to post Share on other sites
digitalmonkey 929 Posted June 16, 2017 Author Share Posted June 16, 2017 Do you want them to trade Galch for a D, just not Dumba, or you want them to keep him for good? Personally, Id look to keep him, unless there are things in background Im not aware of. Same here...I'd love to see him with Drouin. Link to post Share on other sites
digitalmonkey 929 Posted June 18, 2017 Author Share Posted June 18, 2017 Beaulieu trade might mean Galchenyuk stays. Link to post Share on other sites
FCP Bob 1,312 Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 Beaulieu trade might mean Galchenyuk stays. wouldn't trading a d-man make it more likely that they trade him for something that includes more D ? Link to post Share on other sites
digitalmonkey 929 Posted June 18, 2017 Author Share Posted June 18, 2017 wouldn't trading a d-man make it more likely that they trade him for something that includes more D ? The rumour coming out of Montreal is that Beaulieu was a bad influence on Galchenyuk. They may still move Galchenyuk if they don't think he can play C. I have a gut feeling MB has some kind of deal in place to shed salary (Plekanec) to help acquire a Dman. Link to post Share on other sites
digitalmonkey 929 Posted June 18, 2017 Author Share Posted June 18, 2017 I wonder if COL would move MacKinnon in a deal for Galchenyuk? Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now