Donkeytest.com

[XXEddie 0]

i hate my computer

[AlexR 0]

117, though I flew through it in 10 minutes.I really think you could get a perfect score if you just chose fold for every question. Laying down 9's full of aces is +EV!

[Tideplaya 0]

I scored a 119. I think they want you to assume you are always losing to a set-over-set situation. Screw that, 95% of the time I tap the table and say nice hand and realize my set lost to a higher set. I'm still making way more money when two aces pay off my 33 on a 3-8-J flop.

[GetSprung 0]

113 while watching survivor and 5 tabling. I think that's decent for paying little to no attention to stack sizes or how the player plays. Folding a boat to someone who has an obvious flush? Uh...are you kidding?

[Dubey 1,035]

I scored a 126. Which confirms for me that I usually know what the best play is, however, following thorugh on that action when the money is actually in front of you is a totally different story.

[ShaneO19 0]

If this test really takes off points for choosing to raise with the A9 hand then it is a joke. The logic of him overbetting the pot with AA thinking that you will call or raise with a flush or lower fullhouse makes sense but does not mean you shouldn't raise. He could do that with a number of huge hands that still don't beat the A9. He has to have the case two aces.(about 1980 to 1 if I figured that out correctly). I am not saying that someone wouldn't just call before the flop with AA there but that makes is even more unlikely. The A9 player also doesn't have that much more than the 15000 bet. I almost guarantee that if you asked Daniel he would raise. Chris Ferguson who is supposed to be the most knowledgeable player on game theory would certainly raise. I doubt Chris Ferguson has ever folded a flopped set with no straight or flush possibilities after the flop.

[EdwardGreene1 0]

btw, to get a summary, all you need to do is complete a short survey

How did you find that?105 btw

[Balloon guy 158]

Not to brag but the program sent me a request to teach it poker after I took the test. Got like a 240 something. Pretty easy test if you know the right things.

[ShaneO19 0]

Maybe its not 1980 to 1. Might be closer to 1000 to 1.

[Highlow16 0]

Not to brag but the program sent me a request to teach it poker after I took the test. Got like a 240 something. Pretty easy test if you know the right things.

you need to include this in your stake me post."I rebuy for 25 to show them good bankroll management" I would like to see the answers to this test

[FileError404 0]

I scored a 93% ROI! Yeah!

[CobaltBlue 662]

So 132 is pretty good, right?

[qyayqi 11]

it was discussed here and gen strat pretty much agreed the test was not such a great measure of anything meaningful.

[checkymcfold 0]

some notes:lol@folding sets with 1/2 sentences of information.who plays full ring NLHE anyway?nice to know those kids read their harrington. i'd annihilate them if i played them in a tournament.on second thought, who plays NLHE anyway? i'll take all those ****ers down in HORSE.

[JaNnN 0]

it was discussed here and gen strat pretty much agreed the test was not such a great measure of anything meaningful.

Yeah you must be absolutely right. I scored a 90 and I know I'm one of the best in the bussines. Or is this the sign mabey to stop spewing money in the pokercommunity.Anyone wanna play Hu?

[Crosspointe1 0]

I got a 109. I don't know which answer I got wrong according to them. did i miss it or was there no answer key giving "their" best answer. wouldn't mind knowing what i would have played wrong.....

[Brisco 0]

Wow I got a 110. Not too shabby.I loved how next to last question was the opening hand from rounders. I wonder ... do they want to answer how you know the hand turned out or how you would reallyplay it if you had just boated up on a flush board.

[CobaltBlue 662]

I don't think the test's worthless. It's at least somewhat challenging - I had to take my time and consider a number of choices. Obviously, you don't have as much information as you'd like, but that's the case a lot when you're playing (particularly online)...sometimes you don't have more than a vague read.

[Omaha Hi/Lo 0]

Was it just me or did I flop a set every hand? I wish I ran that good in real life...

[Dogpatch 2]

it was discussed here and gen strat pretty much agreed the test was not such a great measure of anything meaningful.

That's what I remember. I think I scored a high 90-something on it.

[KentuckySlim 0]

Here's what I don't understand about the rounders hand when people say to not raise - Teddy KGB also had the 2nd nuts. He loses to 9-9 there. Should he have folded to Mike's all in or just called the initial river bet?

[checkymcfold 0]

Was it just me or did I flop a set every hand? I wish I ran that good in real life...

lol, yeah. the first thing i said to my roommate after taking that quiz was "man, i feel like i just flopped more sets in 15 minutes than i have all year."

[Brisco 0]

Here's what I don't understand about the rounders hand when people say to not raise - Teddy KGB also had the 2nd nuts. He loses to 9-9 there. Should he have folded to Mike's all in or just called the initial river bet?

Honestly who really sniffs out the other boat and lays his down............................. NOBODY You just go broke there.

[mtdesmoines 3]

everything is the same, 4handed, one of the best players in new york, board, a9 vs aa, spades on the river, over bet blah blah

LOL, so seeing the movie Rounders makes you poker smarter?

[YBravo 0]

119I think something is either wrong or at least super counter-intuitive about the tournament rating, though. I was looking at 2+2 comments as well as comments on here, and it seems like everyone got a bad rating for tournaments. They were talking about some of the answers on 2+2 (just click the first score on the front page of the donkeytest site), and it seemed like some of them were pretty ridiculous. I do like the Rounders hand discussion, though. The only thing that might tip Mike off, though, is when he bets 2000 on the flop and Teddy says "That is a pozition raise. I call it." When people defend their call while they're making it, it usually tips off strength. A LHE test makes so much more sense. I wouldn't mind seeing one of those.