staniv 0 Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 wtf no final update on Jesse???? I hope that means he's still crushing souls?Marksays he out in 6th in this threadhttp://www.fullcontactpoker.com/poker-foru...howtopic=132491 Link to post Share on other sites
Whatever 1 Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 had a post in here awhile ago about gunshots waking me up ~midnight. my neighbors are neat toohey i was just wondering what became of that case/trial? Link to post Share on other sites
TB17 0 Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 Jesse for featured member for March! Link to post Share on other sites
Snamuh 0 Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 Jesse for featured member for March!+1 or Lobster. Link to post Share on other sites
whatgreatis 0 Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 +1 or Lobstar.fypAnd I agree. Link to post Share on other sites
TB17 0 Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 I should probably know the answer to this, but say I luckbox a milestone bonus, should I or should I not shove with any 2? Link to post Share on other sites
AAsnake88 0 Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 I should probably know the answer to this, but say I luckbox a milestone bonus, should I or should I not shove with any 2?We need more info to answer this.limit?vip status?stack sizes? Link to post Share on other sites
Moneyball16 0 Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 I should probably know the answer to this, but say I luckbox a milestone bonus, should I or should I not shove with any 2?Open for a standard raise you make it less suspicious to the people who may not be paying attention that its a bonus hand but be willing to go with it.Also I hate how much advantage shortstacks are given in these bonus hands. They shouldn't only have to commit 20% of a stack to get the same prize if they win. I saw a bonus hand happen at a hu table where 2 ssers were playing eachother. It angered me quite a bit. Link to post Share on other sites
TB17 0 Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 We need more info to answer this.limit?vip status?stack sizes?.5/1 NLPlatty StarLets say you know a full stack will call you so basically should you risk a 100 BB stack. What about 200? Link to post Share on other sites
AAsnake88 0 Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 .5/1 NLPlatty StarLets say you know a full stack will call you so basically should you risk a 100 BB stack. What about 200?@ 100nl you are guaranteed $340, so I ship a 100bb stack to win $1100. Link to post Share on other sites
ChicagoMike22 0 Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 There is no way to prove it, which makes it even more fun. Unfortunately it is very real and I am the only one that will ever truly know and believe. Link to post Share on other sites
cwik 0 Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 There is no way to prove it, which makes it even more fun. Unfortunately it is very real and I am the only one that will ever truly know and believe.I know of all people this might sound silly coming from me, but anyone who has put in any volume in this game that doesn't think their graph looks like this is fooling themselves.That said, the rest of it is completely accurate. Link to post Share on other sites
pocktdeuces 0 Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 GFG44<aka9<jj55<45s aipf Link to post Share on other sites
cwik 0 Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 GFG44<aka9<jj55<45s aipfgg jesse. total score? Link to post Share on other sites
therescav 0 Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 Nice job Jesse! Link to post Share on other sites
TB17 0 Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 one of those tiltifying sessions where every move you make gets owned. At least I didnt get stacked. But a lot of 20 BB ownages at a time. I hate you Valley's day Link to post Share on other sites
ChicagoMike22 0 Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 I know of all people this might sound silly coming from me, but anyone who has put in any volume in this game that doesn't think their graph looks like this is fooling themselves.Someone has to be on the out skirts of the bell curve on both sides. So if you believe the three of them for example exist out there on the right. There is a statistical opposite some where out there. Link to post Share on other sites
Snamuh 0 Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 I know of all people this might sound silly coming from me, but anyone who has put in any volume in this game that doesn't think their graph looks like this is fooling themselves.That said, the rest of it is completely accurate.Dude sometimes you just gotta drop the pride and admit it. We know you are a ****ing outlier on that graph. Stop telling yourself you run normal longterm! Link to post Share on other sites
cwik 0 Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 Someone has to be on the out skirts of the bell curve on both sides. So if you believe the three of them for example exist out there on the right. There is a statistical opposite some where out there.The WSOP ME is kind of an anomaly where it lets one person win ridiculous amounts of skalasky bucks that no poker player on earth 'deserves' in one coinflip. On the flip side, it is a lot harder to lose $10 mill through consecutive coinflips in a row (see my pun there?).Edit: Also, Jamie Gold and all the others never really ran statistically that hot over EV in big blinds's. Link to post Share on other sites
ChicagoMike22 0 Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 The WSOP ME is kind of an anomaly where it lets one person win ridiculous amounts of skalasky bucks that no poker player on earth 'deserves' in one coinflip. On the flip side, it is a lot harder to lose $10 mill through consecutive coinflips in a row (see my pun there?).Edit: Also, Jamie Gold and all the others never really ran statistically that hot over EV in big blinds's.If you are talking just about odds of something occurring, what that actual "something" is is irrelevant. If running good enough to win the WSOP ME is comparable to running above expectation for 300-400k hands of poker, I believe I am the statistical opposite of Dennis Philips. Link to post Share on other sites
Naismith 0 Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 This is the graph of my opponent for the night. The hand histories are awesome and horrible and traumatizing. Link to post Share on other sites
FARGOpokerND 22 Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 I dropped $260 tonight at a $2-$10 spread game, with $300 of it to a guy who makes Boston Sul__1 look like Ivey and Durrr's wunderchild. Link to post Share on other sites
cwik 0 Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 Dude sometimes you just gotta drop the pride and admit it. We know you are a ****ing outlier on that graph. Stop telling yourself you run normal longterm!We always regress towards the mean. Link to post Share on other sites
Giggidy 0 Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 I dropped $260 tonight at a $2-$10 spread game, with $300 of it to a guy who makes Boston Sul__1 look like Ivey and Durrr's wunderchild.I'm a live play noob, what does this mean? Link to post Share on other sites
bdc30 0 Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 I'm a live play noob, what does this mean?It's not quite "limit", and it's not quite "no limit", so it's "spread limit". You can bet/raise in increments of between $2-$10 on each street. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now