Sickest Ive Ever Seen

[tswing 0]

I know im a dik for making a new thread just to post a stupid hand history, its weird how much i hate when people do it yet i can't stop myself from posting this hand:PokerStars Game #8050508280: Tournament #40452967, $10+$1 Hold'em No Limit - Level VIII (200/400) - 2007/01/21 - 10:54:31 (ET)Table '40452967 26' 9-max Seat #3 is the buttonSeat 1: iwags (6415 in chips) Seat 2: horseshoe711 (8325 in chips) Seat 3: LeKnave (9425 in chips) Seat 4: BallNutZ (6385 in chips) Seat 5: markymarcAA (5716 in chips) Seat 6: bigboybunk (4015 in chips) Seat 7: blitzfly (2553 in chips) Seat 8: Lozza1 (8475 in chips) Seat 9: t-swing (12386 in chips) iwags: posts the ante 25horseshoe711: posts the ante 25LeKnave: posts the ante 25BallNutZ: posts the ante 25markymarcAA: posts the ante 25bigboybunk: posts the ante 25blitzfly: posts the ante 25Lozza1: posts the ante 25t-swing: posts the ante 25BallNutZ: posts small blind 200markymarcAA: posts big blind 400*** HOLE CARDS ***Dealt to t-swing [Tc 9h]bigboybunk: folds blitzfly: folds Lozza1: raises 800 to 1200t-swing: folds iwags: folds horseshoe711: folds LeKnave: folds BallNutZ: raises 5160 to 6360 and is all-inmarkymarcAA: folds Lozza1: calls 5160*** FLOP *** [Ah Jc 6h]*** TURN *** [Ah Jc 6h] [7d]*** RIVER *** [Ah Jc 6h 7d] [7c]*** SHOW DOWN ***BallNutZ: shows [7h 7s] (four of a kind, Sevens)Lozza1: shows [Ac As] (a full house, Aces full of Sevens)horseshoe711 said, "omg"BallNutZ collected 13345 from potLeKnave said, "oooohhhhhhhmyyyyyyyyyyyyy"*** SUMMARY ***Total pot 13345 | Rake 0 Board [Ah Jc 6h 7d 7c]Seat 1: iwags folded before Flop (didn't bet)Seat 2: horseshoe711 folded before Flop (didn't bet)Seat 3: LeKnave (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)Seat 4: BallNutZ (small blind) showed [7h 7s] and won (13345) with four of a kind, SevensSeat 5: markymarcAA (big blind) folded before FlopSeat 6: bigboybunk folded before Flop (didn't bet)Seat 7: blitzfly folded before Flop (didn't bet)Seat 8: Lozza1 showed [Ac As] and lost with a full house, Aces full of SevensSeat 9: t-swing folded before Flop (didn't bet)I am not involved in the hand, im just sitting at the table trying to get an entry into the sunday warmup

[mclark340 0]

Sick, but not that sick.Aces get nailed all the time.Earth to all poker players...AA is winning before the flop...if outflopped, then AA has very few outs...Procede with caution

[tswing 0]

Sick, but not that sick.Aces get nailed all the time.Earth to all poker players...AA is winning before the flop...if outflopped, then AA has very few outs...Procede with caution

Perhaps you did not read the hand history correctly, AA was winning before the flop, AA was winning on the flop, AA was winning on the turn, then AA lost on the river.Not such a big deal, but it is pretty much the worst, it is worse than a 1 outer because on the flop the 77 has two outs in which he NEEDS both of, hence it is pretty ridiculousNot to mention on the flop the AA is around 96% to win, then on the turn after 77 hits one of his outs, the AA goes up to about 98% to win

[MyPlayIsRAB 0]

normally in that situation with an a on flop and two hearts, the turn and river are both hearts

[Vick12 0]

Sick, but not that sick.Aces get nailed all the time.Earth to all poker players...AA is winning before the flop...if outflopped, then AA has very few outs...Procede with caution

LOL1st....Earth to you Mr. Poker!!! All the $$$ went in PREFLOP when the AA was a 81% fave. (Off the donktastic raise of 77 by Mr. Poker #2) 2nd...His Aces didn't get nailed and he wasn't "OUTFLOPPED"...THE OTHER GUY WENT RUNNER RUNNER PERFECT to make his hand!!!See...I play almost every day...I see sik beat after sik beat....but someone going RUNNER RUNNER PERFECT isn't something u see basically ever.I agree...in general HH's are a waste of time. This was at least interesting and something u don't see all the time.

[tswing 0]

LOL1st....Earth to you Mr. Poker!!! All the $$$ went in PREFLOP when the AA was a 81% fave. (Off the donktastic raise of 77 by Mr. Poker #2) 2nd...His Aces didn't get nailed and he wasn't "OUTFLOPPED"...THE OTHER GUY WENT RUNNER RUNNER PERFECT to make his hand!!!See...I play almost every day...I see sik beat after sik beat....but someone going RUNNER RUNNER PERFECT isn't something u see basically ever.I agree...in general HH's are a waste of time. This was at least interesting and something u don't see all the time.

I guess this is why i was compelled to post it, i don't complain about beats that happen to me, if i had the aces here i wouldn't complain, but definitely interesting to see. Its not like i posted a STRAIGHT FLUSH oooooooooooooooooooh or aces losing to a set on the flop like MRmuck thought

[Vick12 0]

I guess this is why i was compelled to post it, i don't complain about beats that happen to me, if i had the aces here i wouldn't complain, but definitely interesting to see. Its not like i posted a STRAIGHT FLUSH oooooooooooooooooooh or aces losing to a set on the flop like MRmuck thought

Yeah runner runner perfect is the single most disgusting way to get beat. AINEC!!!Now...step away from the "new topic" button!!!

[wrathuc 0]

But this one wasn't a bad beat technically because they were all-in PF....but still sucks.

[tswing 0]

But this one wasn't a bad beat technically because they were all-in PF....but still sucks.

So explain to me, when exactly did the rule change to say that if you get all your money in preflop with an 81% chance of winning and lose it is no longer a bad beat?? I didn't hear anything

[13CARDS 0]

In the book Championship Pot-Limit and No-Limit Hold’em, co-author T.J. Cloutier tells of a bad beat in which pocket kings lost to pocket tens, but only because the dealer, thinking that the hand was over, mistakenly dropped the deck into the discards before the flop. It was ruled that all the discards needed to be shuffled back into the deck and remainder of the hand dealt. One of the discarded hands made the perilous journey from the discard pile back into the new deck. You guessed it - the other pair of pocket tens, one of which came on the flop of king-ten-four, and the other which came on the turn.“If you can think of a worse bad beat story than this one, I'd like to hear it,” says T.J. at the end of the story.Well, T.J., listen up. The scene is a typical game of $3-3-6-12 Texas hold'em from the earlier days of poker rooms in Alberta casinos. This was years before Varkoni, Moneymaker, and Raymer opened up poker to the public’s eye with their impressive performances, and years before internet poker made the game accessible on such a wide scale.A new player sits down and looks a little unsure as he pulls out his money. The dealer tells the new player that he needs to post $3 to get into the game, which he does, and the cards are dealt. Among the first to act, I look down and see ace-king suited. Not a bad little hand so I fire in a raise. Predictably, I get a few callers, and the new player looks a little confused. The dealer helps him out, telling him that it will cost $3 more to stay in the hand.The flop comes absolutely beautiful for me: ace-seven-five, with two of my suit. Perfect! I'd be hard pressed to hand-pick three better cards out of the deck without arousing suspicion. Out I come swinging with a bet on the flop. All fold to the new player, still confused, and the dealer explains that it’s $3 if he wants to keep his hand, so he calls, and the others fold.On the turn lands another ace, giving me three aces, a nut flush draw, and an opponent that has never played before. Does it get any better? Another bet on the turn, the dealer mentions that it’s $6 if he wants to keep his hand, and the guy tosses in $6.The river brings that glorious little deuce of my suit, bearing my nut flush draw unto fruition. $12 more gets fired into the pot, and sure enough, with the dealer's instruction, new guy throws his $12 into the pot because he wants to keep his hand. I triumphantly turn over my ace-high flush, and the dealer tells the new guy to turn up his hand.“Aces full,” says the dealer, and moves the new guy's ace-seven offsuit to the center of the table.Now, I know what you're thinking - just another ordinary bad beat, I should be grateful the guy didn't raise me with the stone cold nuts on the river, and so forth. It's what happened next that I will never forget.“Aces full?” asks the new player. “What do you mean?”“You have a full house, aces over sevens,” says the dealer.“Oh, I'm sorry,” says the new guy, “I thought this was a blackjack table.”If you know me, then you know how serious something must be if it can actually leave me speechless. Eventually, I stammer out some question to the guy, wondering why he called all the way in a game he didn't even know, but I'm sure you can see the answer a mile away.“Well, I had eighteen...”Uh huh. New guy thought he had eighteen, I thought an ace-high flush was good, and time makes fools of us both. Somewhere in an alternate universe, the alternate new-guy is asking for a hit to his queen-five offsuit while the alternate Mousseau rakes in the chips with his flush.In this universe, however, the new guy is staying true to his word, picking up his chips and getting ready to head to the blackjack table. In retrospect, while I'm certainly grateful that the worst bad beat in history only cost me $27, I regret that it took me minutes to say what I should have said instantly, the one thing which would have given me one last shot at winning the pot: “Get back here, damn you, I had twenty-one!”Charles Mousseau is a writer and poker enthusiast from Calgary, Alberta.From: http://www.canadianpokerplayer.com/pokerar...asp?article=103

[mclark340 0]

When the money is all in pre-flop...the order of the board does not matter. Reverse the board and you don't make the post.

[TylerSalzman 0]

i don't complain about beats that happen to me, if i had the aces here i wouldn't complain, but definitely interesting to see. Its not like i posted a STRAIGHT FLUSH oooooooooooooooooooh or aces losing to a set on the flop like MRmuck thought

Screw that.. if I had those aces I would complain, haha. the only thing that beats Aces full is quads or higher and the guy did hit the only two cards he could hit to win. a .1% chance to win

[TylerSalzman 0]

When the money is all in pre-flop...the order of the board does not matter. Reverse the board and you don't make the post.

It kind of matters, because one way can be way more heartbreaking than the other~ I love flops like that... you know the ones. Where one player starts out ahead preflop, than the other player gets lucky on the flop, but then the original best hand makes something good on the turn, but of course the other guy like fills out on the river. Lead changes with every card that comes off.

[tswing 0]

When the money is all in pre-flop...the order of the board does not matter. Reverse the board and you don't make the post.

You are correct sir, but the board was not reversed soooo.. and are you agreeing with the other guy that it is not technically a bad beat, regardless of what happened it was a bad beat.

[wrathuc 0]

QQ vs. 1010 all in pf, and QQ wins. How is that a bad beat?Edit: My picture has disappeared

[Vick12 0]

When the money is all in pre-flop...the order of the board does not matter. Reverse the board and you don't make the post.

Umm....if the other dude flopped Quads he doesn't post that because it's a standard bad beat.Do you not UNDERSTAND that in this case...he had to...slow down...wait for it...GORUNNERRUNNERPERFECT!!!Since you are all over OP's nutz about this, PLEASE post all of your HH's where you saw someone draw RUNNER RUNNER PERFECT!!!In fact...I'd GLADLY ship you a $20 spot if you can find me EVEN ONE HH where someone sucked out going RUNNER RUNNER PERFECT!!! If you can produce a HH with YOUR HOLE CARDS (so I know it is authentic and NOT a HH u find somewhere else) and someone goes RUNNER RUNNER PERFECT...$20 will be shipped to that SAME ACCOUNT. Deal?

[delphi12 0]

Umm....if the other dude flopped Quads he doesn't post that because it's a standard bad beat.Do you not UNDERSTAND that in this case...he had to...slow down...wait for it...GORUNNERRUNNERPERFECT!!!Since you are all over OP's nutz about this, PLEASE post all of your HH's where you saw someone draw RUNNER RUNNER PERFECT!!!In fact...I'd GLADLY ship you a $20 spot if you can find me EVEN ONE HH where someone sucked out going RUNNER RUNNER PERFECT!!! If you can produce a HH with YOUR HOLE CARDS (so I know it is authentic and NOT a HH u find somewhere else) and someone goes RUNNER RUNNER PERFECT...$20 will be shipped to that SAME ACCOUNT. Deal?

After the money is all in - it doesnt matter the ORDER OF THE CARDS. Hopefully, you understand this concept. It looks sick, but it just as easily could have come 77 on the flop. Once the money is in, the order of the cards matters not.

[Vick12 0]

JHVFJKAHNCKASODFHFFASOSFWow...is this reading comprehension day?I'll start over...OP make a post showing a SIK SIK BEAT...Mclark makes a post stating....AA gets busted, this is standard...yada yada...basically a "why post a HH thread...we don't care"I respond...this isnt the normal beat, but a runner runner perfect beat...Mclark comes back w/...if the flop is 77, this isn't even a post. (WHICH I 100% AGREE W/ SINCE HE POSTED IT BECAUSE IT WENT RUNNER RUNNER PERFECT)I challenge Mclark to show me even ONE hand where he personally saw runner runner perfect..U then chime in w/ the...it doesn't matter when the beat happened, the $$$ went in preflop...yada yada.Look...people...the OP simply posted a bad beat that RARELY happens. Every day, u get 2 outered and maybe even the occasinal 1 outer. I play a TON of poker, and I can't remember more than once or twice where I ever personally saw someone catch 2 perfect cards to win. The OP thought...hey check this out...YOU DON'T SEE THIS EVERY DAY type of post and of course there are the obligatory BBFIDTS, Quit posting, AA get cracked deal w/ it yada yada bullchit responses.This IS a poker forum isn't it?

[tswing 0]

After the money is all in - it doesnt matter the ORDER OF THE CARDS. Hopefully, you understand this concept. It looks sick, but it just as easily could have come 77 on the flop. Once the money is in, the order of the cards matters not.

You are right about the 77 on the flop, but as vick keeps backing me up with it was not 77 on the flop, it was A, so take out all aspect of money in this hand and just look at it, I don't know how to calculate the chances of this happening, all i know is 97% on flop and 98% on turn, so whatever those odds are someone else can tell you, it was just a pretty amazing progression of cards. My OP has absolutely nothing to do with a pair of aces losing, just the progression.The fact of the matter is the A came on the flop and not the 77 so regardless of where money went in the percentages are still the same, and the odds are quite amazing when you take a close look at this one.I have been here for a long friggin time, granted i only have 180 posts, and none of those 180 are a HH so relax a little bit.

[BeaverStyle 1]

People love to look like they're the smartest person in the inter-world, don't they?Anyone who says "it's just a normal bad beat because all the money went in preflop".... you're wasting your time. Why even post that?To say the order of the cards doesn't matter is simply ridiculous. Yes, AA was a 81% favorite over 77 preflop... but how many times will 77 end up making RUNNER RUNNER quads in this scenario, having needed it to win? That's what's 'rigged' about this hand, not the fact that 77 won... It could have been AA against AK w/ an A x K flop... turn K river K.Bunch of shmucks, if you ask me.

[Doug 0]

But this one wasn't a bad beat technically because they were all-in PF....but still sucks.

Yes it was

[yourboygsarida 0]

um vick i cant give you the hand history because all i was doing was watching but in the sunday mill within the last two months it was down to two tables and preflop two guys were all in one with tens and the other like kj. the flop was 10 5 5 i think and the turn and river were both kings. guy who caught the runners ended up finishing 6th instead of 14th, with a nice swing of +$30k from that beat. it was sick, prob sicker then this hand

[BeaverStyle 1]

um vick i cant give you the hand history because all i was doing was watching but in the sunday mill within the last two months it was down to two tables and preflop two guys were all in one with tens and the other like kj. the flop was 10 5 5 i think and the turn and river were both kings. guy who caught the runners ended up finishing 6th instead of 14th, with a nice swing of +$30k from that beat. it was sick, prob sicker then this hand

wow.If I took that beat I would hope there were none of the following near me:1. A baby2. A kitten3. Anything alive that is small, that would probably get thrown through a wall.That is all..

[LongLiveYorke 38]

Bad Beat forum is down the street.....oops, too late, it's already been moved.Too bad about a random number generator hitting a 2/10, by the way.

[wrathuc 0]

Yes it was

I had a picture up of QQ vs. 1010. The 1010 flops quads and QQ goes runner runner Q to win. That is what I was talking about. However, the pic somehow doesn't show up right.