Wingmaster05 0 Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 The problem that I have with this is that not everyone wanted to go to Iraq. The whole country wasn't on board from the beginning. This is the poker equivalent of you wanting to raise PF with 48o me saying it's a bad idea, and you do it anyways because you don't want my advice. Then we get to the flop you continuation bet and get check raised all in. You decide to stay the course because you thought it was a good idea in the first place. You ask me what my solution is to win with 48o? I don't have one, but I wouldn't have been in there to begin with.Compounding mistakes occur.not to mention the reason for going to war, while bypassing congress, without the majority of the american people, was on two big accusations. 1. WMDs2. Saddam ties to Al Qaeda/9-11Both determined to be untrue. But that's all right, let's double the troops so we can further solidify our place in the ME and prepare for war with Iran!...er, what?bush vs bush debate. bush waffles more than kerry methinks. Link to post Share on other sites
digitalmonkey 929 Posted January 23, 2007 Share Posted January 23, 2007 http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/01/22/...ideo/index.html Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now