SSPadawon4 0 Posted October 6, 2006 Share Posted October 6, 2006 i found this on cardplayer http://cardplayer.com/poker_news/news_stor...class=PokerNews its pretty interesting. Link to post Share on other sites
profxavier9 0 Posted October 6, 2006 Share Posted October 6, 2006 i was just about to post this before i saw it posted already. it is quite interesting yet for some reason i have a feeling the guy who wrote is talking out of his a s s.I hope he is right though. *crosses fingers* Link to post Share on other sites
SSPadawon4 0 Posted October 6, 2006 Author Share Posted October 6, 2006 i was just about to post this before i saw it posted already. it is quite interesting yet for some reason i have a feeling the guy who wrote is talking out of his a s s.I hope he is right though. *crosses fingers*allyn jaffery shulman is a woman. Link to post Share on other sites
Hotmark777 0 Posted October 6, 2006 Share Posted October 6, 2006 First of all it was a "Girl" who wrote it, and she is a well known and well respected attorney in California. And if you read the law that was passed and apply what she says in her article. She is clearly not talking out of "her" A.S.S.It was a good article, and the first person to really speak out by breaking down the law that was passed, and how it truly applies. I don't see Raymer, or Bloch who are also attorneys trying to help us understand anything? Link to post Share on other sites
JMoney2681 0 Posted October 6, 2006 Share Posted October 6, 2006 i was just about to post this before i saw it posted already. it is quite interesting yet for some reason i have a feeling the guy who wrote is talking out of his a s s.I hope he is right though. *crosses fingers*??? Link to post Share on other sites
Scott31 0 Posted October 6, 2006 Share Posted October 6, 2006 Excellent article. Still, I wonder if he's right. Why would PartyGaming throw away billions without being sure about the interpretation of the law? Link to post Share on other sites
profxavier9 0 Posted October 6, 2006 Share Posted October 6, 2006 First of all it was a "Girl" who wrote it, and she is a well known and well respected attorney in California. And if you read the law that was passed and apply what she says in her article. She is clearly not talking out of "her" A.S.S.It was a good article, and the first person to really speak out by breaking down the law that was passed, and how it truly applies. I don't see Raymer, or Bloch who are also attorneys trying to help us understand anything?blah who cares blah blah i hope SHE is right.Excellent article. Still, I wonder if he's right. Why would PartyGaming throw away billions without being sure about the interpretation of the law?^^^This is why it seems to me that she is speaking out her a s s, that doesnt make much sense to turn your back to all that cash Link to post Share on other sites
Scott31 0 Posted October 6, 2006 Share Posted October 6, 2006 blah who cares blah blah i hope SHE is right.^^^This is why it seems to me that she is speaking out her a s s, that doesnt make much sense to turn your back to all that cashIF Shulman is right, the only reason PartyGaming would fold is because they have something up their sleeves about future operations in the U.S. But that is doubtful. Link to post Share on other sites
FourFlusher 0 Posted October 6, 2006 Share Posted October 6, 2006 Did anybody else find it interesting that a month or so before this happened Party switched from home towns to countries in their on screen profiles? Link to post Share on other sites
fatman 1 Posted October 6, 2006 Share Posted October 6, 2006 I like this analysis. This is the one I am going with. All the other ones I will ignore. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now