Jump to content

Aa Twice Limped Utg, Two Diff Results


Recommended Posts

An SW in your signature is not the equivalent of an SW in your post.
But Actuary's post about online poker ban issue was fine because he is um your butt sex buddy?Seriously think about it. I assumed w/o an sw that he was serious and then you say he was just kidding.well i was just kidding too...see why you are a dumb fuc.k?again have butt sex with actuary
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

He'll learn about limp raising with huge hands when NO ONE raises him. Six people call and the flop comes down 228 and you lose to the SB who has 23o! Okay, it happened to me. I was playing live in the casino; it was the third hand I was dealt; I was UTG. I knew I was beat; I just had to fully punish myself for limping with bullets.....never again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't hate mixing in limp-reraises as much as everyone else, but I generally do it if I have an aggressive player on my left that raises a lot and I know other players will call his raise because he raises a lot. I'm generally looking to take down a bunch of BB without seeing a flop. I'm willing to reveal the strength of my hand there to take an uncontested pot.In any case, checking this flop is so freaking horrible that it hurts the soul of my pug. I'm not bashing the OP, just the play. You bet out here and you stack the guy. What are you trying to represent with the way you played the hand? AK, maybe? The only possible hand you could have is AA.Edit: I knew I had a thread from a while ago about this. http://www.fullcontactpoker.com/poker-foru...ic=6827&hl=

Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't hate mixing in limp-reraises as much as everyone else, but I generally do it if I have an aggressive player on my left that raises a lot and I know other players will call his raise because he raises a lot. I'm generally looking to take down a bunch of BB without seeing a flop. I'm willing to reveal the strength of my hand there to take an uncontested pot.In any case, checking this flop is so freaking horrible that it hurts the soul of my pug. I'm not bashing the OP, just the play. You bet out here and you stack the guy. What are you trying to represent with the way you played the hand? AK, maybe? The only possible hand you could have is AA.Edit: I knew I had a thread from a while ago about this. http://www.fullcontactpoker.com/poker-foru...ic=6827&hl=
Yea, checking the flop in the first hand is bad. You need to bet...if I was in the hand and that went down I'd be quite weary to. I'd put you on one of two hands. AA or QQ. AA slowplaying, QQ slowing down cause of the board. Whenever someone makes a re-raise PF and then slows down when a A/K falls I usually think he is "trapping".The other funny move is when you get delayed raise. Usually a delay raise or bet is extreme strength...I only think it's a bluff if you are playing opponents who know this and know you "know" it as well and are bluffing you by using the delay raise. I use this tell more live, but I've seen it online enough to think it's a valid tell. I personally havn't played full ring games for a long time, but I prefer open raising UTG, unless i'm in an extremelyyyyyyyyyyyyy aggressive game and im 90% sure it's getting raised behind me. Otherwise I open raise like I do a variety of hands cause it throws off your opponents.And yes...too many people are just putting in their thoughts off the results of the hand. The fact that KK slowed down shows that he was a good player, but I know for a fact that he will never fold KK here if you bet the flop/turn and river respectively. I also would argue he might be a nit in not repopping it PF. I don't care, in a $50 nl game I'm getting all in PF everytime with KK. I still don't relaly fold KK in $400nl cash games (which sux when it happens in multiple sessions) ....point is...this guy may have been "afraid" of you having AA but I still get it all in there pf if I'm him.I'd still open raise more though.edit -- i just dbl checked and it's FTP..well that makes sense...site is full of nits.- Jordan
Link to post
Share on other sites
Full Tilt Poker Game #1069970404: Table Lindell (6 max) - $0.25/$0.50 - No Limit Hold'em - 16:10:56 ET - 2006/10/05
If your gonna move this from the short handed forum to the NL forum whats the point of the short handed forum?
Link to post
Share on other sites
If your gonna move this from the short handed forum to the NL forum whats the point of the short handed forum?
SH forum is for SH LHE.I think we should have a SH NL forum too though.They won't give me admin powers...
Link to post
Share on other sites
SH forum is for SH LHE.I think we should have a SH NL forum too though.They won't give me admin powers...
This is the heading under the Short Handed Hold'em Forum"Discuss both short handed limit and no limit hold'em here"booooo mods
Link to post
Share on other sites
This is the heading under the Short Handed Hold'em Forum"Discuss both short handed limit and no limit hold'em here"booooo mods
Ya, we know.In the guidelines inside, it says just LHE.It's just something that developped over time into just SH LHE.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Honestly, I dont no how good you guys are who replied or what stakes you play, but I have always felt the limp reraise is a good play, and it usually almost always works. You see people on HSP doing it all the time. Also what i forgot to add was that almost every hand was being raised preflop anyway, so i thought someone would raise.At 50 NL, i feel like most players are not that good to even realize what is going on, this player was an exception. An example is the 2nd hand i posted, that guy had 10 10 and put all his $ in. Whoever said they dont like my call here, maybe you didnt no that this guy was doing this stuff all game, like there was no way im folding there.
I love that part. If it wasnt for the ban, we would have a bunch of new players playing all type of hands like J7o, because Daniel 3-bet it preflop. :club: In short, no need to be tricky at the low limits, they don't see those aces coming most of the time. You get an A+ in representing aces in the first hand though.
Link to post
Share on other sites
This thread is retarded.So much results based thinking. So much closed-minded replies from the OP.
QFT
But Actuary's post about online poker ban issue was fine because he is um your butt sex buddy?Seriously think about it. I assumed w/o an sw that he was serious and then you say he was just kidding.well i was just kidding too...see why you are a dumb fuc.k?again have butt sex with actuary
please stay out of strategy douchebag
Link to post
Share on other sites
Look, i am admitting that i feel sick about that result of that hand...im just saying that the limp raise is still a good play, and the only way the open raise works that way is the guy happens to have KK. I love when people say stuff like that....you already know the freaking results!! so many times everyone just folds and you win the blinds. At my table, almost EVERY hand got raised preflop, why not do the limp raise play??
That is why you raise preflop.. it makes it so no one thinks something fishy (pun intended) is up... guy with kings reraises.. you push.. he calls end of story...
Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems like a heated discussion from most peoples post so I won't get into to much here but I will add something about the first hand that can help disguise your hand. When you limp and he raises, if you are sure you will get heads up then you can just call safely and that will help hide your hand and you could get a nice payoff this way to.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 year later...

hahahaha. i just found this thread. its truly amazing to look back on some of the hands that you play. this guy really did absolutely soul read me when i had AAA and he had KKK. its to this day still the most embarrassing hand I have ever played. And yes, I just made the most unnecessary bump ever. BUMP!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Honestly, I dont no how good you guys are who replied or what stakes you play, but I have always felt the limp reraise is a good play, and it usually almost always works. You see people on HSP doing it all the time. Also what i forgot to add was that almost every hand was being raised preflop anyway, so i thought someone would raise.At 50 NL, i feel like most players are not that good to even realize what is going on, this player was an exception. An example is the 2nd hand i posted, that guy had 10 10 and put all his $ in. Whoever said they dont like my call here, maybe you didnt no that this guy was doing this stuff all game, like there was no way im folding there.
The guy still made a pretty sick read. I'd be going flat broke in that situation every single time.
This thread is retarded.So much results based thinking. So much closed-minded replies from the OP.
Yeah, I don't really know why you guys were arguing via results based thinking. Waste time much?
Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't bother reading all the posts, but since the tourny strat forum is dead, I would like to add in 1 thing.Limp reraise at low stakes tournaments=KK, AA, or maybe AK or QQ.I would assume the same holds true for cash games.Also, fancy plays are relatively pointless at lowlimits. You can play standard TAG and have a higher winrate.imho.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The last time I limped with aces a guy shot me. At the time I thought it was the money, but maybe he was just trying to enforce his ideas on good strategy.

Link to post
Share on other sites
The last time I limped with aces a guy shot me. At the time I thought it was the money, but maybe he was just trying to enforce his ideas on good strategy.
That's quite plainly the most persuasive argument for not limping ever.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...