Actuary 3 Posted October 28, 2006 Share Posted October 28, 2006 Act, just leave him alone. Let him continue to troll in his own world.Custom warned me about feeding the trolls, and Dane specifically, let's just end this and let him troll on elsewhere.I guess I did not realize what a troll he was.I should pay more attention.so he has a history huh? Link to post Share on other sites
Zach6668 513 Posted October 28, 2006 Share Posted October 28, 2006 I guess I did not realize what a troll he was.I should pay more attention.so he has a history huh?exhibit a: http://www.fullcontactpoker.com/poker-foru...showtopic=78247 Link to post Share on other sites
_Great_Dane_ 0 Posted October 28, 2006 Share Posted October 28, 2006 This thread is like beating a dead horse. We've covered all angles.I contribute more than enough everywhere else.You, on the other hand, do not.You keep coming back to this thread unnecessarily. You do contribute; but so do I. You're a frustrated individual saying that I don't.Good day.You're leaving again?And coming right back? Link to post Share on other sites
Actuary 3 Posted October 28, 2006 Share Posted October 28, 2006 meh, that was just lamenonetheless it appears to be a new phenomenahe's adorable, really is. Link to post Share on other sites
Zach6668 513 Posted October 28, 2006 Share Posted October 28, 2006 You keep coming back to this thread unnecessarily. You do contribute; but so do I. You're a frustrated individual saying that I don't.You're leaving again?And coming right back?I sure haven't see you contribute anything worth much.Never said I was leaving. I said 'Good day'. Furthermore, I was replying to Actuary, not you. Link to post Share on other sites
_Great_Dane_ 0 Posted October 28, 2006 Share Posted October 28, 2006 exhibit a: http://www.fullcontactpoker.com/poker-foru...showtopic=78247 Pointing out this thread is interesting. I put you in your place for using profanity in this thread. Why do some kids call others a "retard" when they don't like what the person has done? It seems as though there's an insecurity issue. Yelling in all caps was poor etiquette as well:http://www.fullcontactpoker.com/poker-foru...t&p=1484466You then went back and edited it. Either because I pointed it out, or because a mod told you to do it. But your abusive statement was captured in my quote of you before you edited it.This thread is way off topic and it's unfortunate that I've let Zach drag me down to his level (almost). You have given me a good idea, though. And unlike you, I mean what I say:Manage your ignored users Name--------Group-------Posts Zach6668---Members----7537 (a lot for only 8 months)Anyone can feel free to get the last word, but you better do it quickly. Link to post Share on other sites
holyfield 0 Posted October 28, 2006 Share Posted October 28, 2006 Again?In this case, you're getting better odds on your money than the odds of making your hand. If you win the hand, the big payoff can be used to make a lot more $$$.he just hit the nail on the head here, thanks dane.still....easy....call.....just concede actuary you know its the best play Link to post Share on other sites
Actuary 3 Posted October 28, 2006 Share Posted October 28, 2006 holy,lolyou give lots of bad adviseIt does not surprise anyone that you don't comprehend this question Link to post Share on other sites
iggymcfly 0 Posted October 28, 2006 Share Posted October 28, 2006 What's it going to take for this thread to die? Do I need to start posting scat pictures in here or something? Link to post Share on other sites
holyfield 0 Posted October 28, 2006 Share Posted October 28, 2006 What's it going to take for this thread to die? Do I need to start posting scat pictures in here or something?actuary saying unclei dont give bad advice at all, any bad advice that i truly give could be chalked up to the difference b/t online poker and live because i am a poker savant. Link to post Share on other sites
BudBundy 0 Posted October 28, 2006 Share Posted October 28, 2006 Time for another hijack.I am sitting on 4 buy-ins in the table.I am CO.Button has 4 buy-ins as well we are the only big stacks on the table.I have KKxx.No spades.I raise preflop.someone else re-pots i call button calls.Button has QJxx 2 spades.Flop K 10 x Two spades.I pot flop he folds button re-pots for around 2.5 buy ins.Now i am around %55-60 favourite on this flop.My question is can this be a fold with these stack sizes?Cus if my small edge doesn't hold up i won't be winning 3 buy ins next time in this exact situation happens.Is it profitable to risk 3 buy-ins at this hand with this edge knowing i ll be winning only 1 buy in in future hands?I wanted to be as clear as possible i hope you understand the question.You can run the same scenerio in No Limit Holdem this is not an omaha question. Link to post Share on other sites
holyfield 0 Posted October 28, 2006 Share Posted October 28, 2006 yes its profitable, dont hijack this thread, go make your own Link to post Share on other sites
Zach6668 513 Posted October 28, 2006 Share Posted October 28, 2006 yes its profitable, dont hijack this thread, go make your ownThis thread is stupid, and dead, and continuously filled with stupidity.*********Turkey,I call there all day long if I know I have an edge of any kind.Even if you won't win 3 buyins the next time, the long run is more than long enough to run into enough times when you do, if you see what I'm saying. Link to post Share on other sites
Abbaddabba 0 Posted October 28, 2006 Share Posted October 28, 2006 Actuary has flipped out so many times that it's difficult to tell if people are trying to set him off again by saying stupid things, or if they really are just that stupid. Link to post Share on other sites
Zach6668 513 Posted October 28, 2006 Share Posted October 28, 2006 Actuary has flipped out so many times that it's difficult to tell if people are trying to set him off again by saying stupid things, or if they really are just that stupid.They really are that stupid. Link to post Share on other sites
BudBundy 0 Posted October 28, 2006 Share Posted October 28, 2006 This thread is stupid, and dead, and continuously filled with stupidity.*********Turkey,I call there all day long if I know I have an edge of any kind.Even if you won't win 3 buyins the next time, the long run is more than long enough to run into enough times when you do, if you see what I'm saying.I got it so in cash games even 51% is fine.what about this example happens in a tourney? Link to post Share on other sites
_Great_Dane_ 0 Posted October 28, 2006 Share Posted October 28, 2006 Time is up for the last word !!!Before the thread gets locked, click here to see who posted the most in this thread. No surprises:http://www.fullcontactpoker.com/poker-foru...who&t=76123 Link to post Share on other sites
Zach6668 513 Posted October 28, 2006 Share Posted October 28, 2006 I got it so in cash games even 51% is fine.what about this example happens in a tourney?Depends on a lot more, ie payout structure, average stack, etc.I'd be more likely to fold a big draw in a tournament than in cash games. Link to post Share on other sites
antistuff 0 Posted October 29, 2006 Share Posted October 29, 2006 Actuary has flipped out so many times that it's difficult to tell if people are trying to set him off again by saying stupid things, or if they really are just that stupid.guilty as charged.but im sure he knows that already. and i hope it made him smile. Link to post Share on other sites
Actuary 3 Posted October 29, 2006 Share Posted October 29, 2006 guilty as charged.but im sure he knows that already. and i hope it made him smile.too many otherwise seemingly intelligent people were overlooking the details laid out and therefore disregarded the Ruin potential. Intially I was trying to help people understand the premise of the question. I noted early, I thought Dane was jerking around, mostly because he looked like an idiot in another math related thread and likes to be annoying (troll, as Zach would say). Holyfield really is that dumb. He's probably going to say he was kidding; but most of his posts indicate he's an arrogant ignoramous.I took your antagonizing as innocent mis understanding and not reading thoughroughly. I had not re-read thread to pick up on your comments along the way that may have tipped me off. No one really knows me; but i'm not one of the guys that thinks he knows/does everything well. I admit ignorance on here all the time and in my real life, too. But when I know I'm right, I can get persistent. A tad.I'm shocked I have the most posts in this thread.that was a good find Dane. Link to post Share on other sites
BudBundy 0 Posted October 29, 2006 Share Posted October 29, 2006 I would like to amend my original post to say "you all except Bud are not getting it" Link to post Share on other sites
holyfield 0 Posted October 29, 2006 Share Posted October 29, 2006 actuary = ownedso OP, did we hit on the river or are we never playing poker again? Link to post Share on other sites
Zach6668 513 Posted October 29, 2006 Share Posted October 29, 2006 actuary = ownedso OP, did we hit on the river or are we never playing poker again?Actuary def did not get owned.2ndly, we didn't see the river. We folded and packed it in. Link to post Share on other sites
Actuary 3 Posted October 29, 2006 Share Posted October 29, 2006 actuary = ownedbitter?you laugh at your own jokes and applaud your posts.you wouldn't know what owned was if it hit you upside the head.you won't last here.too bad,you had so much to learn. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now