pockets 0 Posted May 17, 2006 Share Posted May 17, 2006 yeah, but notes from underground is hilarious, if you're sick and twisted like meUnderground Man + the prostitue = wacky hijinks. They should have a sitcom where they have to be roommates for some reason.Hollywood, get on that. Link to post Share on other sites
timwakefield 68 Posted May 17, 2006 Share Posted May 17, 2006 Fiction, is by definition, an untrue story. Stories, whether they be presented in a book, on TV, or in a movie is intended as entertainment. Since the stories aren't based in fact, and the reader doesn't actually learn anything by reading it, it is mindless. Get it? Mindless entertainment...regardless of when it was written.I wish I had a direct quote here, but I don't so I'll paraphrase. I was reading an article by Orhan Pamuk (who is a great contemporary novelist), and he was talking about the war is Sarajevo. He said that we wouldn't really know what it is like until the Sarajevan novelists wrote books about it. To call all novels "mindless entertainment" is incredibly naive. Here is a list of novels that I love, and recommend (and will change your mind about what a novel is):The Sun Also Rises - Ernest HemmingwayA Farewell to Arms - Ernest HemmingwaySkinny Legs and All - Tom RobbinsMy Name is Red - Orhan PamukA Scanner Darkly - Philip K. DickSlaughterhouse-Five - Kurt VonnegutThe Sound and the Fury - William FaulknerRaise High the Roof Beam, Carpenters and Seymour: An Introduction - J.D. Salinger Link to post Share on other sites
Dirtydutch 8 Posted May 17, 2006 Share Posted May 17, 2006 I wish I had a direct quote here, but I don't so I'll paraphrase. I was reading an article by Orhan Pamuk (who is a great contemporary novelist), and he was talking about the war is Sarajevo. He said that we wouldn't really know what it is like until the Sarajevan novelists wrote books about it. To call all novels "mindless entertainment" is incredibly naive. Here is a list of novels that I love, and recommend (and will change your mind about what a novel is):The Sun Also Rises - Ernest HemmingwayA Farewell to Arms - Ernest HemmingwaySkinny Legs and All - Tom RobbinsMy Name is Red - Orhan PamukA Scanner Darkly - Philip K. DickSlaughterhouse-Five - Kurt VonnegutThe Sound and the Fury - William FaulknerRaise High the Roof Beam, Carpenters and Seymour: An Introduction - J.D. SalingerI'm not a Hemingway fan. He's wonderfully descriptive, but I just don't enjoy his work. I think there was a time when I did... Certain writers-- I just can't read their work. Link to post Share on other sites
Mercury69 3 Posted May 17, 2006 Share Posted May 17, 2006 I'd like to add a couple of books to the Must Read list:To Kill A Mockingbird - Harper LeeLolita - Vladimir NabokovI could be convinced into saying that these two books are the best I've ever read. I'm not going to say that, mostly because there are dozens of others that would warrant mention along with them. Try and read them, though. Well worth it.PS: DirtyDutch, I know I need glasses, but every time I see your name, it looks like "DirtyB itch", which reminds me of that Larry Sanders Show episode where Hank meets a couple of Wu Tang Clan members and asks them where Dirty Ol' B itch is lol. Link to post Share on other sites
bigkg 0 Posted May 17, 2006 Share Posted May 17, 2006 Yea, I hated the DaVinci Code.Anyways, my favorite books are...A Clockwork Orange- Anthony BurgessOne Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest- Ken Kesey1984- George OrwellBrave New World- Aldous HuxleyLord of the Flies- William Goldingand of course anything by Vonnegut Link to post Share on other sites
BigDMcGee 3,352 Posted May 17, 2006 Share Posted May 17, 2006 That I hijacked this thread from stupid summer blockbuster, to a discussion about contemporary literature, just warms the cockles.Just finished 100 years of solitutude. the hype not just hype, absolutely beautiful book. Link to post Share on other sites
ricker 0 Posted May 17, 2006 Share Posted May 17, 2006 When Homer recited The Oddessy in a bar in Rome a few thousand years ago he was doing so in order to entertain his crowd and perhaps teach a few lessons along with it. No one's denying that he did that. Now it's taught as one of the great stories of our time.In the DVC Dan Brown is doing the same thing. If you simply dismiss the DVC out of hand without thinking there could be anything to be learned from it is...well ignorant. I truly believe there are lessons in any sort of book/entertainment. One example that can be debated was Dan Brown was commenting on the Catholic Church's villification of the female in all of Church theology. It wasn't just a fun puzzle about The Holy Grail. Dan Brown does include messages through his popcorn entertainment. Simply dismissing out of hand any book because it doesn't fit in your description of what true LITERATURE is supposed to be is just plain ignorant in my view. Link to post Share on other sites
pockets 0 Posted May 18, 2006 Share Posted May 18, 2006 That I hijacked this thread from stupid summer blockbuster, to a discussion about contemporary literature, just warms the cockles.Just finished 100 years of solitutude. the hype not just hype, absolutely beautiful book.You're amazing.Y'know, in a good way. Link to post Share on other sites
timwakefield 68 Posted May 18, 2006 Share Posted May 18, 2006 When Homer recited The Oddessy in a bar in Rome a few thousand years ago he was doing so in order to entertain his crowd and perhaps teach a few lessons along with it. No one's denying that he did that. Now it's taught as one of the great stories of our time.FYPAlso, the reason that The DaVinci Code sucks is that the prose sucks. "Person A said this. Person B said this. Person A did this. Person B did this." For like 600 pages. Link to post Share on other sites
Suited_Up 2 Posted May 18, 2006 Share Posted May 18, 2006 FYPAlso, the reason that The DaVinci Code sucks is that the prose sucks. "Person A said this. Person B said this. Person A did this. Person B did this." For like 600 pages.But can we agree that the premise of the story was a good one?(haven't read it, but know a lot about the story) Link to post Share on other sites
ricker 0 Posted May 18, 2006 Share Posted May 18, 2006 FYPAlso, the reason that The DaVinci Code sucks is that the prose sucks. "Person A said this. Person B said this. Person A did this. Person B did this." For like 600 pages.righto...thanks for that Tim, you're absolutely right. Link to post Share on other sites
joeltebbutt 0 Posted May 18, 2006 Share Posted May 18, 2006 This is the worst book I have ever read. It reads like a 12 year old wrote it Link to post Share on other sites
BigDMcGee 3,352 Posted May 18, 2006 Share Posted May 18, 2006 Yeah, I wasn't talking about the "issues" brought up in the DVC, i was talking about how poor the writing is, though issues like woman's role in the Catholic church, or if there was a conspiracy to hide the fact that christ had kids ranks pretty low on my give a **** about list.John Grisham addresses things like class and race in almost all of his books, it doesn't make them any more readible. Link to post Share on other sites
ricker 0 Posted May 18, 2006 Share Posted May 18, 2006 Yeah, I wasn't talking about the "issues" brought up in the DVC, i was talking about how poor the writing is, though issues like woman's role in the Catholic church, or if there was a conspiracy to hide the fact that christ had kids ranks pretty low on my give a **** about list.John Grisham addresses things like class and race in almost all of his books, it doesn't make them any more readible.Fair enough...but in my ever so humble opinion my friend, no matter how poor the writing is, a good issue thoughtfully discussed will always make a book interesting to me, no matter how poorly written you may think it is. Link to post Share on other sites
beans-n-icewater 18 Posted May 18, 2006 Share Posted May 18, 2006 I saw it next friday. It was awesome.humor... pure and simple I also enjoyed the pancakes one...The OP's shi-t the bed one gets high marks alsoI may have to go back and delete the "FCP is starting to suck" thread...I tip my Corona to the smart-*sses of this great forum... keep up the good work! Link to post Share on other sites
joeltebbutt 0 Posted May 18, 2006 Share Posted May 18, 2006 Carl Hiaasen > Dan Brown.I highly reccomend his books Link to post Share on other sites
reverbse 0 Posted May 19, 2006 Share Posted May 19, 2006 if you want to be a writer as good as dan brown but have so far failed because of the complexity of the storylines, let yourself be inspired here:http://tobyinkster.co.uk/Software/dan_brown/ Link to post Share on other sites
mk 11 Posted May 19, 2006 Share Posted May 19, 2006 John Grisham addresses things like class and race in almost all of his books, it doesn't make them any more readible. Probably a good idea to spell-check if you're gonna play the role of literary pompous ass. Link to post Share on other sites
BigDMcGee 3,352 Posted May 19, 2006 Share Posted May 19, 2006 Probably a good idea to spell-check if you're gonna play the role of literary pompous ass.nope, that's what editors are for.. I focus on content, not ***-thet -icks. Link to post Share on other sites
ROGUE06 0 Posted May 20, 2006 Share Posted May 20, 2006 I am probably going tonight to see it. Anybody see it yet since it came out last night? Link to post Share on other sites
MisterB 2 Posted May 20, 2006 Share Posted May 20, 2006 I am probably going tonight to see it. Anybody see it yet since it came out last night?if it wasnt for communion theres no way id stand in a line that long... GOAL it is... Link to post Share on other sites
digitalmonkey 929 Posted May 21, 2006 Share Posted May 21, 2006 Your inability to describe what makes a book bad, or describe you idea of a good book doesn't exactly lend credence to your arguments either. You seem to be pretty good at belittling others without providing any real substance to your theories. I have read a lot of "classical" works that are considered great literature, I have read a lot of modern novels, and I have read a lot of non-fiction. Dan Brown's work is great fiction. He grabs the reader's attention and holds onto it rather expertly, and he tells a hell of a good story. I can understand people denouncing his work because it does present some sacreligious topics, and he doesn't help his case by declaring that all of his content is based in historical fact. But I don't understand your claim that his writing style is somehow "dumbed down". People don't sell over 40 million copies of a book in modern times without it having some sort of merit.Just ignore bigdmgee and he'll go away....oh wait, he'll only claim to go away. Link to post Share on other sites
BigDMcGee 3,352 Posted May 21, 2006 Share Posted May 21, 2006 Just ignore bigdmgee and he'll go away....oh wait, he'll only claim to go away.Love you too, baby.. good to hear from you... Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Mexico 4,219 Posted May 22, 2006 Share Posted May 22, 2006 one of you is a self righteous, pretentious toolbox that craves attention.you know who you are. Link to post Share on other sites
BigDMcGee 3,352 Posted May 22, 2006 Share Posted May 22, 2006 one of you is a self righteous, pretentious toolbox that craves attention.you know who you are.Di Vinci Code? More like Di Vinci CHODE Har har har, I kill me.. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now