handsfactor 0 Posted May 11, 2006 Share Posted May 11, 2006 His name was Joe Stillman and yes he was a complete donk, but somehow finished in like 80th or 150th place. The last hand was soo donkish when he pushes all in with an ace on the board with pocket deuces then says how he can't believe the guy called the raise with A-10.I believe when he was bitching, he was complaining about the guy calling the pre-flop raise, not his push after the flop. Aside from that he certainly acted like a donk, on some of the other hands. Earlier he called Fergueson's pre-flop all-in with K-9.And to the guy calling Raymer a donk, didn't he settle any arguments about his skill by finishing 25th the very next year? Link to post Share on other sites
Smasharoo 0 Posted May 11, 2006 Share Posted May 11, 2006 nd to the guy calling Raymer a donk, didn't he settle any arguments about his skill by finishing 25th the very next year?No.Did daniel settle arguments by finishing out of the money two years in a row? Does that mean he sucks?It's constantly shocking how many people post on poker message boards that don't understand tournament variance at all.good luck. Link to post Share on other sites
bobbywithani 0 Posted May 11, 2006 Share Posted May 11, 2006 nd to the guy calling Raymer a donk, didn't he settle any arguments about his skill by finishing 25th the very next year?No.Did daniel settle arguments by finishing out of the money two years in a row? Does that mean he sucks?It's constantly shocking how many people post on poker message boards that don't understand tournament variance at all.good luck.Well I think he is a good player, but yes two good finishes mean nothing. If he made 25th 25 years from now, people would think nothing of it, but since it was the year after he won it means he is great. His ability has been shown in many cash games, and several other tournies, on-line and live. Link to post Share on other sites
_Great_Dane_ 0 Posted May 11, 2006 Share Posted May 11, 2006 Varkyoni, i'll take those odds. Q-10 all the way baby... it's the new nutsRobert or Olga? I feel that Olga has a better chance. Link to post Share on other sites
Flushgarden 0 Posted May 11, 2006 Share Posted May 11, 2006 Dan HarringtonJust think of how many books will sell if he final tables again. If he wins he'll never have to work or play poker or write again if he doesn't feel like it. Link to post Share on other sites
anselm 0 Posted May 11, 2006 Share Posted May 11, 2006 Um, Smash... surely you realize that finishing out of the money two years in a row is far less indicative of suckitude than finishing in the money two years in a row is of kickassness. That is to say, neither Negreanu nor Raymer are donks. Link to post Share on other sites
XXEddie 0 Posted May 11, 2006 Share Posted May 11, 2006 probably some pro weve never heard ofsomebody like a "new" andrew black or tex barch Link to post Share on other sites
Suited_Up 2 Posted May 11, 2006 Share Posted May 11, 2006 $20 says no way.$10,000 says no way. Link to post Share on other sites
fleung22 1 Posted May 11, 2006 Share Posted May 11, 2006 I definitely have my money on a pro for the 50K horse event...Should be a lot at the final table and will make for an interesting show.Well duhhh...the event will only be participated by the pros. Not all the pros, much less amateurs, know all the games well enough to put up $50K. Link to post Share on other sites
TB17 0 Posted May 11, 2006 Share Posted May 11, 2006 Aaron Kanter or PartyPoker Qualifier. Link to post Share on other sites
yergan 0 Posted May 11, 2006 Share Posted May 11, 2006 Aaron KanterDing ding ding, we have a winner. Link to post Share on other sites
TheCinciKid 0 Posted May 11, 2006 Share Posted May 11, 2006 Most likely a no name pro or semi-pro. Link to post Share on other sites
Steamed Rice 0 Posted May 11, 2006 Share Posted May 11, 2006 Tiffany Williamson is hungry for more, so i wouldnt count her out Link to post Share on other sites
myenemy 0 Posted May 12, 2006 Share Posted May 12, 2006 Um, Smash... surely you realize that finishing out of the money two years in a row is far less indicative of suckitude than finishing in the money two years in a row is of kickassness. That is to say, neither Negreanu nor Raymer are donks.Well said.My money is on that little bast**d the played heads up with Freddie Deeb somewhere in the Carribean, Josh Something!!Has a woman ever FTed? Sorry but breasts and final tables have a long way to go, but when they're a regular...watch out!! Link to post Share on other sites
MasterLJ 0 Posted May 12, 2006 Share Posted May 12, 2006 PartyPSux. No contest. Link to post Share on other sites
poguemahone68 0 Posted May 12, 2006 Share Posted May 12, 2006 Well said.My money is on that little bast**d the played heads up with Freddie Deeb somewhere in the Carribean, Josh Something!!Has a woman ever FTed? Sorry but breasts and final tables have a long way to go, but when they're a regular...watch out!!Barbara Enright final tabled in 1995. She took an ugly beat to get knocked out too. Link to post Share on other sites
Emmser 0 Posted May 12, 2006 Share Posted May 12, 2006 Phil Ivey or DN Link to post Share on other sites
blakheart 3 Posted May 12, 2006 Share Posted May 12, 2006 I honestly think it will be a real pro this time. I know the odds are long, but over 6 or 7 days of poker they will have the advantage. Link to post Share on other sites
FatBurger 0 Posted May 12, 2006 Share Posted May 12, 2006 I was going to make a comment about how they had made a rule change to not include luck this year and so Phil Hellmuth was a shoe-in, but I decided against it.The odds are against the pros. Even if everybody who's ever won a WSOP bracelet (Stu Ungar included) was at the ME, then they'd still be outnumbered by everyone else by a fair margin. It's simply hard to fight your way through something like that, it's like racing through waist deep water.Side note: I think one of the biggest signs of the explosive growth of poker is that Steve Danneman has won more on the WSOP with one 2nd place ME finish than Johnny Chan, with 10 bracelets (2 in the ME). And whoever wins this year could possibly win more than the previous three winners combined. It's amazing. Link to post Share on other sites
PMJackson21 0 Posted May 12, 2006 Share Posted May 12, 2006 Well said.My money is on that little bast**d the played heads up with Freddie Deeb somewhere in the Carribean, Josh Something!!Josh Schlein (sp?)To be honest, I like this prediction the best of all I've read. Link to post Share on other sites
profxavier9 0 Posted May 12, 2006 Share Posted May 12, 2006 im gonna flip a coin who thinks its gonna be heads and who thinks it going to be tales?ps i didnt vote Link to post Share on other sites
anselm 0 Posted May 12, 2006 Share Posted May 12, 2006 Barbara Enright's 88 vs 63s... gotta be one of the sickest FT beats ever. Link to post Share on other sites
ROGUE06 0 Posted May 12, 2006 Author Share Posted May 12, 2006 do you know what episode # of the ME that this is?Joe Stillman busted in one of the episodes before the final 30 with Ivey and Raymer. So my guess would be episode 7 or 8 of the main event. Link to post Share on other sites
MasterLJ 0 Posted May 12, 2006 Share Posted May 12, 2006 Barbara Enright's 88 vs 63s... gotta be one of the sickest FT beats ever.Meh. Mathematically, I just had a worse one. AA vs JJ on a Q82 flop, Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now