Anyone Good With Prop. Logic?

[socalpoker_j 1]

Need some help with my logic problem set... if anyone is well versed in propositional logic and could lend a helping hand to a fellow fcper it would be much appreciated. Thanks.

[Mercury69 3]

The FCP Braintrust appears to have abandoned you, sir.

[LongLiveYorke 38]

Post your questions. There are smart people here. They'll see what they can do.

[Shimmering Wang 1]

I'm your Huckleberry.Before I was politely asked to leave University, I dabbled in Philosophy, and definitely beat that logic up.Put that problem set up, or send me a PM, and I'll help.Logically Fallacious Wang

[Ouch-8s 4]

You'll get better responses in Strat.

[Petoria 0]

I want to see the logic problem set as well.Those are fun.

[buzbrad11 0]

As part of my cs program I took a prop. logic course, post your Q's and I will see what I remember.

[Petoria 0]

I just checked the time stamp on the OP post.Looks like someone was trying to pull an all-nighter, and gave up and looked for help from us.We let him down.

[socalpoker_j 1]

The problem set is not due till next week.. Ill post in a few hours thanks

[socalpoker_j 1]

If possible, prove each of the following arguments to be valid, using the twelve valid inference rules, the valid equivalencies, and the rule of Conditional Proof. One of these arguments is invalid. Use the Short Truth Table method to prove that it is invalid. A. 1. (~A V ~E) 2. (B V D)3. (C ⊃ E) /.: (( A ∙ B ) ⊃ ~(D V E))B. 1. (( B V D) ⊃ A) 2. (( E V D) ⊃ C) 3. ~(A ∙ C) /.: (B⊃ E)C. 1. (A V B ) 2. (C ⊃ B ) 3. (~B⊃ (C∙ D)) /.: ~AD. In the following argument, circle and label flag words, cross out throw away language, etc. Translate the argument into standard form using the appropriate symbols. Create a key indicating the meaning of propositional constants. Prove the argument to be valid using inference rules, equivalancies, and if appropriate the rule of Conditional Proof. "The Queen is going to be annoyed. If the Duchess doesn't go to the Queen's party, then of course she will stay home. If the Duchess does go to the Queen's party, then the Duke wil go, too. However, if the Duke goes to the Queen's party, the Early will stay home. If the Earl stays home, then the Countess will stay home, too. Yet, if either the Duchess stays home or the Countess stays home, the Queen is going to be annoyed.For anyone that can help me to finish I would greatly appreciate it. Its my last assignment, therefore my toughest and I need to make a good grade to finish the course and be a few weeks closer to graduating. If you can PM me or post here I'd appreciate it. Thanks to everyone for their offers of assistance. If anyone feels monetary compensation is necessary I'm more than willing to compensate you for your time and guidance.

[Shimmering Wang 1]

The problem set is not due till next week.. Ill post in a few hours thanks

motherfucker I was hoping to give my brain a workout after the bar (okay, okay, fine: my house post- 11pm) tonight.Hope to see that problem set tomorrow. It had better be Universal and Existential shit, or I'll be disappointed. Okay, so I'll take what I can get....Wang

[Golden 2]

If possible, prove each of the following arguments to be valid, using the twelve valid inference rules, the valid equivalencies, and the rule of Conditional Proof. One of these arguments is invalid. Use the Short Truth Table method to prove that it is invalid. A. 1. (~A V ~E) 2. (B V D)3. (C ⊃ E) /.: (( A ∙ B ) ⊃ ~(D V E))B. 1. (( B V D) ⊃ A) 2. (( E V D) ⊃ C) 3. ~(A ∙ C) /.: (B⊃ E)C. 1. (A V B ) 2. (C ⊃ B ) 3. (~B⊃ (C∙ D)) /.: ~AD. In the following argument, circle and label flag words, cross out throw away language, etc. Translate the argument into standard form using the appropriate symbols. Create a key indicating the meaning of propositional constants. Prove the argument to be valid using inference rules, equivalancies, and if appropriate the rule of Conditional Proof. "The Queen is going to be annoyed. If the Duchess doesn't go to the Queen's party, then of course she will stay home. If the Duchess does go to the Queen's party, then the Duke wil go, too. However, if the Duke goes to the Queen's party, the Early will stay home. If the Earl stays home, then the Countess will stay home, too. Yet, if either the Duchess stays home or the Countess stays home, the Queen is going to be annoyed.For anyone that can help me to finish I would greatly appreciate it. Its my last assignment, therefore my toughest and I need to make a good grade to finish the course and be a few weeks closer to graduating. If you can PM me or post here I'd appreciate it. Thanks to everyone for their offers of assistance. If anyone feels monetary compensation is necessary I'm more than willing to compensate you for your time and guidance.

I wish I could help you man, but I will bow to the greater intellects around here

[Love4hockey 0]

As part of my cs program I took a prop. logic course, post your Q's and I will see what I remember.

They off classes on Counter Strike?sw

[socalpoker_j 1]

Anyone take a look at these yet?

[socalpoker_j 1]

I guess the braintrust has forsaken me..

[gkunit20 1]

Math Mumbo Jumbo

Ummmmmmm, what?

[socalpoker_j 1]

Its Prop Logic... I was stuck taking it as one of my Major Electives.... it's killing me.

[loogie 115]

B = Matt Damon

[phlegm 6]

If possible, prove each of the following arguments to be valid, using the twelve valid inference rules, the valid equivalencies, and the rule of Conditional Proof. One of these arguments is invalid. Use the Short Truth Table method to prove that it is invalid. A. 1. (~A V ~E) 2. (B V D)3. (C ⊃ E) /.: (( A ∙ B ) ⊃ ~(D V E))B. 1. (( B V D) ⊃ A) 2. (( E V D) ⊃ C) 3. ~(A ∙ C) /.: (B⊃ E)C. 1. (A V B ) 2. (C ⊃ B ) 3. (~B⊃ (C∙ D)) /.: ~AD. In the following argument, circle and label flag words, cross out throw away language, etc. Translate the argument into standard form using the appropriate symbols. Create a key indicating the meaning of propositional constants. Prove the argument to be valid using inference rules, equivalancies, and if appropriate the rule of Conditional Proof. "The Queen is going to be annoyed. If the Duchess doesn't go to the Queen's party, then of course she will stay home. If the Duchess does go to the Queen's party, then the Duke wil go, too. However, if the Duke goes to the Queen's party, the Early will stay home. If the Earl stays home, then the Countess will stay home, too. Yet, if either the Duchess stays home or the Countess stays home, the Queen is going to be annoyed.For anyone that can help me to finish I would greatly appreciate it. Its my last assignment, therefore my toughest and I need to make a good grade to finish the course and be a few weeks closer to graduating. If you can PM me or post here I'd appreciate it. Thanks to everyone for their offers of assistance. If anyone feels monetary compensation is necessary I'm more than willing to compensate you for your time and guidance.

Just shoot the queen, throw the duke in jail, impregnate the dutchess and crown yourself King. Am i close??