Royal_Tour 0 Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 What are your thoughts on Phil Laak, aka the Unibomber, and his antics at the poker table.. Good or bad for televised poker and/or poker itself as a whole ? Link to post Share on other sites
Fenxis 99 Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 The WPT folks seem to love him but I find he makes episodes fairly unwatchable. Link to post Share on other sites
Frills 0 Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 He's a jackass Link to post Share on other sites
....Ian.... 0 Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 good for TV ratings....i think he may be trying to pull off that 'crazy player' style that caro talks about in supersystem Link to post Share on other sites
jrthunter 0 Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 His antics can get annoying.......but...... if he gets you to root for him or root against him.....he's getting you to root (care) and that is a good thing for poker. Link to post Share on other sites
beernivore 0 Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 He's obviously a great player but, overall, I'm kind of sick of the WWF quality on WPT. At some point the over-the-top stuff is just way too annoying. Link to post Share on other sites
tripOne 0 Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 I find him pretty amusing to watch. It's great that nobody can get a read on the guy. Link to post Share on other sites
custom36 5 Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 I don't enjoy his antics, but I suppose they're good for ratings. Link to post Share on other sites
aggiebutts 0 Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 my least favorite WPT episode is the one with Laak, Humberto, and Juhanda. He annoyed the hell out of me. If I would have been at the table i would not be able to control my temper...Which i guess is the point...and why i would lose. Link to post Share on other sites
justblaze 0 Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 do you really think he cares about whats good for poker or ratings or TV or fans? i bet you he cares about whats good for his bank account. and regardless of what hes doing, it clearly is beneficial to his financial situation. Link to post Share on other sites
Billy Butlins 0 Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 Good for ratings yes and overall, i think he's great :-) Problem with poker sometimes is everyone gets annoyed at losing hands and most of the time it's silence, fair enough being silent in a hand, i don't argue with that, but after a hand, have a joke, have a laugh, make joining the competition worthwile even if you don't win.Although yes... sometimes Phil Laak can go O.T.T Link to post Share on other sites
BilliardsBoy 0 Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 This either makes you smile or pisses you off. Simple as that. Link to post Share on other sites
jayistheman 0 Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 nothing beats the T-REX dance... nothing Link to post Share on other sites
BilliardsBoy 0 Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 I tried desperately to find a pic of that, but failed.Yes, it would have def been funnier than the above picture, but mine will have to do. Link to post Share on other sites
blakalicious 0 Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 phil made me laugh the entire time he was on the WPT episode. I think his poker style is too crazy for me, but damn is that guy funny. Link to post Share on other sites
ErikM 0 Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 I mean lets face it... he acts like a goober.However, I like the fact that he is:A.) trying to create a table image unlike any other pro playerB.) draws so much attention to himself... (and away from the game at hand) that it is obviously to his benefitC.) obviously doesn't give a rats-ass what anyone else thinks of his antics because they are helping his bottom lineD.) gets the crowd to cheer for him, which has to have some psycological effect on the ppl he is playing. Link to post Share on other sites
Aburame Shino 0 Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 I like watching the Unibomber do weird stuff on TV, but I'm guessing it gets annoying to have to sit across the table from him as he's doing all these weird things. Link to post Share on other sites
ddoggphx 0 Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 I like watching the Unibomber do weird stuff on TV, but I'm guessing it gets annoying to have to sit across the table from him as he's doing all these weird things.And that's the point. He isn't doing it for the TV audience. He's doing it to get an edge on everyone else at the table. Link to post Share on other sites
Emptyeye 0 Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 As I've said somewhere around here, "Like most poker pros, I'd much rather watch him than play him.UNlike most poker pros, this stems more from his personality than any skill he exhibits"Note that I do not doubt that he would play circles around me in a heads-up match, but as several others here have mentioned, sitting at a table with him, I'm more likely to think "What an ***, I wanna punch him out" than I am "Oh no, he's going to take all my chips!"He is fun to watch, though. Link to post Share on other sites
Chez52 0 Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 Watching on TV.....hes great......very funnyIf I was sitting across from the table from him I would be annoyed, but you just have to block it out.....Also hes not the most annoying player in poker......you ever see Tony G from WPT Paris Season 1......now theres a guy that needs a good beating......When playing against players like that you just have to block them out and focus on your game.....easier said than done thats for sure Link to post Share on other sites
theresa113 0 Posted March 19, 2005 Share Posted March 19, 2005 I love Phil Laak. He is so entertaining. Link to post Share on other sites
dEv~ 19 Posted March 19, 2005 Share Posted March 19, 2005 Funny thing is that he seems kinda normal when he's not in the heat of the moment. If I was John Juanda that day I'd prolly would flipped out on that jackarse. Having said that he's prolly good for poker. Anymore people that think they got what it takes to win is good for the pros. Link to post Share on other sites
Joeltp85 0 Posted March 19, 2005 Share Posted March 19, 2005 I love Phil Laak. I have no idea why so many people find him soo anoying. All of his antics at the table, while beneficial to his image, are authentic to his personality, in my opinion. Table antics aside, I can't believe anybody could say anything negative about him as a person.And, yes, the T-Rex dance is the best. Link to post Share on other sites
HtotheNootch 0 Posted March 24, 2005 Share Posted March 24, 2005 Watching on TV.....hes great......very funnyIf I was sitting across from the table from him I would be annoyed, but you just have to block it out.....Also hes not the most annoying player in poker......you ever see Tony G from WPT Paris Season 1......now theres a guy that needs a good beating......When playing against players like that you just have to block them out and focus on your game.....easier said than done thats for sureTonyG's on tonight. Laak's kind of funny, and he's not really directly rude to the players. Tony on the other hand - well let's just say "Where's Sam Grizzle when you need him?" Link to post Share on other sites
dtemp 0 Posted March 24, 2005 Share Posted March 24, 2005 If someone wants to have a little fun while playing poker, that's fine. I really don't care as long as they're not doing it at someone else's expense (i.e. berating or overly taunting the competition). However, in Lak's case, I really can't stand how he he slows the game down. That's my only complaint. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now