Essay21 2,387 Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 It is not transferable. It's associate supplemental insurance and only available to current bank employees. Link to post Share on other sites
brvheart 1,758 Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 I just have term life. Whole life seems like a waste of money to me. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
InternetExplorer 2,609 Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 term is wonderful. group life (what essay probably has) gets ridiculously expensive around 55-60. Link to post Share on other sites
iQuack 128 Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 1.1 for me. May be light but I hold out hope I can make it to 45. Makers mark may have other ideas. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
InternetExplorer 2,609 Posted August 3, 2016 Share Posted August 3, 2016 there are some amazing life insurance products that work like a Roth. the funds end up locked up for a long time, but it's invested in standard index funds, and the distributions (loans against the policy, effectively) are all tax free. one of those things I think we will look back on in like 10 years, after the government misses out on an assload of revenue, and wonder why it was allowed to persist for so long. whenever I cap out on qualified contribution avenues, I'll probably start a policy myself. Link to post Share on other sites
brvheart 1,758 Posted August 3, 2016 Share Posted August 3, 2016 More info please. Link to post Share on other sites
Napa Lite 3,279 Posted August 3, 2016 Share Posted August 3, 2016 Your boy is not feeling great. Can't wait to get home so i can nap. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
The Ocho 970 Posted August 3, 2016 Share Posted August 3, 2016 More info please. They are called IUL's and they are great for people who have significant income to shove money into. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
InternetExplorer 2,609 Posted August 3, 2016 Share Posted August 3, 2016 yeah, pretty much. it can still be a benefit at lower asset levels, but somewhat not worth the effort. we are starting a relationship with one of the big consumer staples names, and I'm starting to see the asset flows from their 401k plan custodian. blows my mind. they pay us to talk to their outplaced executives, basically. it makes perfect sense from their perspective, but in the context of advisors who cold call for 10 years with the hope of building a modest book of business, that would salivate over any of these people... it's so ridiculous. Link to post Share on other sites
Essay21 2,387 Posted August 4, 2016 Share Posted August 4, 2016 Your boy is not feeling great. Can't wait to get home so i can nap. RIP NAPA. I'll miss him. Watching KISS THE GIRLS. love Morgan freeman. Link to post Share on other sites
BigDMcGee 3,355 Posted August 4, 2016 Share Posted August 4, 2016 I think it's very reasonable to not have life insurance until you're, at the very least, married; but until kids is just about perfect. I have a very tiny policy that's basically enough to cover my funeral ( which I wouldn't even have, if up to me, but funerals aren't for the dead, they are for the living). When my moms passes, I'm going to cash that policy in and spend it on strippers* *I'm using "stripper" here as a catch all for all manner and variety of sex worker. ya'll don't really need the nuts and bolts of the type of sex worker I'll actually be hiring 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Napa_Don 688 Posted August 4, 2016 Share Posted August 4, 2016 I'm still alive. Still not feeling great though. At least it's Friday, amirite?! 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Napa_Don 688 Posted August 4, 2016 Share Posted August 4, 2016 My old roommate called me yesterday asking if I wanted to hangout and go fishing this weekend. Might do that instead of the reunion. Link to post Share on other sites
Essay21 2,387 Posted August 4, 2016 Share Posted August 4, 2016 No, McGee. I do need the nuts and bolts. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Essay21 2,387 Posted August 4, 2016 Share Posted August 4, 2016 Strat, do you have any big S corps with built in C Corp E&P? Mine is having a serious gross receipts problems with its MLPs so we'll likely be hit with the penalty on the 2016 return. But they're asking me for MLP recommendations and I'm like that's not my area. The tax problem is pretty clear, and the answer is we need to put another million in an MLP or less on one that has abnormally large gross receipts. The income isn't even that important. Link to post Share on other sites
InternetExplorer 2,609 Posted August 4, 2016 Share Posted August 4, 2016 Strat, do you have any big S corps with built in C Corp E&P? Mine is having a serious gross receipts problems with its MLPs so we'll likely be hit with the penalty on the 2016 return. But they're asking me for MLP recommendations and I'm like that's not my area. The tax problem is pretty clear, and the answer is we need to put another million in an MLP or less on one that has abnormally large gross receipts. The income isn't even that important. I am taxtarded, sorry. MLPs, you mean like the oil pipeline indices? I meant to ask, are you still in P&G? Link to post Share on other sites
brvheart 1,758 Posted August 4, 2016 Share Posted August 4, 2016 RIP NAPA. I'll miss him. Watching KISS THE GIRLS. love Morgan freeman. Solid movie. I really liked the book. Link to post Share on other sites
Essay21 2,387 Posted August 4, 2016 Share Posted August 4, 2016 I am taxtarded, sorry. MLPs, you mean like the oil pipeline indices? I meant to ask, are you still in P&G? We're talking a section 1375 penalty, and essentially our only option to pass the test is to invest in publicly traded partnerships. And yes, our main MLP is an oil pipeline company because it produces gross receipts that far outpace the income. This is good because as an investment corporation our net passive income is obviously high. Our problem is a socially/environmentally conscious shareholder (really he is the only beneficiary of the trust that owns the shares) who pushed hard, before I was on the board of the corporation to divest some of the MLP. This was agreed to because we had room to spare, but now gross receipts projections are down 27% for 2016 so we are going to be in the penalty on next years return. We absolutely cannot allow it to happen in consecutive years, no matter how small the penalty so we need to buy into a new MLP, but that beneficiary is still against getting more of the oil pipeline. So we need something else and that isn't my area. As for P&G I don't even know. Very seldom to our PMs talk individual stocks. Link to post Share on other sites
InternetExplorer 2,609 Posted August 4, 2016 Share Posted August 4, 2016 No, I meant you personally. I think I recommended P&G to you at some point. I think its valuation has reached a level that doesn't make much sense. Many of the consumer staples and utilities companies fit that description currently. If that kind of shit starts becoming a routine problem for my firm, I will be a very wealthy person. Link to post Share on other sites
Napa Lite 3,279 Posted August 4, 2016 Share Posted August 4, 2016 Strat, how do you go about identifying these types of valuations? Link to post Share on other sites
JubilantLankyLad 1,957 Posted August 4, 2016 Share Posted August 4, 2016 Strat, how do you go about identifying these types of valuations? dart -> dartboard 1 Link to post Share on other sites
InternetExplorer 2,609 Posted August 4, 2016 Share Posted August 4, 2016 Morningstar.com, go to the valuation tab for the company in question, look at current or forward P/E vs. its five year average. be skeptical and look for outlier years, etc. but that's generally how I arrive at my conclusions. P/E is a really strong indicator for return, but there are always caveats. why are defensive sectors 'overvalued' right now? because interest rates have continued to inch closer to zero, so people are seeking yield in safer sectors as a substitute. maybe P&G ought to be priced the way it is currently, I don't know. I'm just assuming history will continue to repeat itself, and I'm hoping to be right 55%. Link to post Share on other sites
Napa Lite 3,279 Posted August 4, 2016 Share Posted August 4, 2016 Ok but how do you pick which companies to look at? Link to post Share on other sites
SuitedAces21 2,723 Posted August 4, 2016 Share Posted August 4, 2016 No, I meant you personally. I think I recommended P&G to you at some point. I think its valuation has reached a level that doesn't make much sense. Many of the consumer staples and utilities companies fit that description currently. If that kind of shit starts becoming a routine problem for my firm, I will be a very wealthy person. i never bought any myself. bought some nike and some apple. Link to post Share on other sites
InternetExplorer 2,609 Posted August 5, 2016 Share Posted August 5, 2016 Ok but how do you pick which companies to look at? we have about 600 companies that we screen for price movement on a daily basis. my boss has some general criteria based on fundamentals, and I came up with a way to drill down into the Russell 3000 index with those criteria, using Google Sheets. once I got rid of all the low hanging fruit, I just reviewed the financials by hand, and struck an additional thousand or so companies over a few weekends. I just review the list of 600 for big price declines and jump in when the valuation seems good. AAPL was one, and I bought it for a few people. I don't think NKE has ever hit our radar in three years, which is kind of a testament to how freaking good their management is. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now