crocd99 0 Posted January 24, 2006 Share Posted January 24, 2006 oh fcpers i was in my bus. org. class today and this problem came up. in short it was just asking if you should advise a partnership to put up one million dollars to make 20 million but the probablility of making that 20 million is only one in forty.well us poker guys know that the answer is no. because a one in forty chance to make 20 million is only worth 500k bet in the long run to break even, so the invest appears to be a losing on in the long run.well alot of the class didnt quite understand the logic so after class he asked me if i could find a very simple way to explain this.so do you guys have a very elementary way of explaining this Link to post Share on other sites
turd ferguson 1 Posted January 24, 2006 Share Posted January 24, 2006 You should just tell them all not to be so stupid. That's what I would do. It's pretty simple as it is. Link to post Share on other sites
speedz99 145 Posted January 24, 2006 Share Posted January 24, 2006 If you make this investment a million times, you will get $20M once every forty times.$20M * (1/40) = $500kSo $500k is you expected value in the long run.$500k < $1M If your expected return is less than your investment you're an idiot.And your classmates are fairly useless if they can't understand that.Is there any other way to explain this? I assume this is what you said. Link to post Share on other sites
blackntan06 0 Posted January 24, 2006 Share Posted January 24, 2006 You should just tell them all not to be so stupid. That's what I would do. It's pretty simple as it is.i agree with that one. :-) :-) Link to post Share on other sites
Fullhouse7 0 Posted January 24, 2006 Share Posted January 24, 2006 You answered it--$1MM to make $20MM or $19MM profit. Easy answer: $19MM x .025(1/40)=$475,000. -EV Link to post Share on other sites
Simpleton 0 Posted January 24, 2006 Share Posted January 24, 2006 Simple explanation:1/40 is .025 or 2.5% chance..025 times $20,000,000 is $500,000.Simple. Link to post Share on other sites
Fullhouse7 0 Posted January 24, 2006 Share Posted January 24, 2006 Wrong--you must subtract your initial investment--see my explanation above.Fullhouse7 Link to post Share on other sites
grgimpy 0 Posted January 24, 2006 Share Posted January 24, 2006 You should just tell them all not to be so stupid. That's what I would do. It's pretty simple as it is.wow, people jumped all over this one. i thought statistics was a prerequisite to business school anyways. i'd feel comfortable with your standing amoung your classmates if i were you. Link to post Share on other sites
crocd99 0 Posted January 24, 2006 Author Share Posted January 24, 2006 You should just tell them all not to be so stupid. That's what I would do. It's pretty simple as it is.i agree with that one. :-) :-)yeah i think thats what i will say.i dont know why some felt it was hard to grasp. i didnt think it the explanation in class could get much simplier. maybe it was because the company with the one million was in debt and i guess the class just saw the fact that hey this is a good way to get out of debt.well just thought i would make sure it couldnt be explained any easier Link to post Share on other sites
speedz99 145 Posted January 24, 2006 Share Posted January 24, 2006 Wrong--you must subtract your initial investment--see my explanation above.Fullhouse7Well...it depends on how you read the question.put up one million dollars to make 20 millionI read this as a $20M profit. Link to post Share on other sites
crocd99 0 Posted January 24, 2006 Author Share Posted January 24, 2006 You should just tell them all not to be so stupid. That's what I would do. It's pretty simple as it is.wow, people jumped all over this one. i thought statistics was a prerequisite to business school anyways. i'd feel comfortable with your standing amoung your classmates if i were you.its law school and i feel pretty good among my class mates now Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Mexico 4,238 Posted January 24, 2006 Share Posted January 24, 2006 You should just tell them all not to be so stupid. That's what I would do. It's pretty simple as it is.grinder mj thinks you are funnier than me? No.I still love you though Franky boy.It is Frank isn't it?I like real names better. Link to post Share on other sites
crocd99 0 Posted January 24, 2006 Author Share Posted January 24, 2006 Wrong--you must subtract your initial investment--see my explanation above.Fullhouse7Well...it depends on how you read the question.put up one million dollars to make 20 million I read this as a $20M profit.that is correct Link to post Share on other sites
turd ferguson 1 Posted January 24, 2006 Share Posted January 24, 2006 You should just tell them all not to be so stupid. That's what I would do. It's pretty simple as it is.grinder mj thinks you are funnier than me? No.I still love you though Franky boy.It is Frank isn't it?I like real names better.I wasn't even being funny. That's just what I would say. People like it when you're condescending.Actually, my real name is Caleb. I thought I told you that before, Chris. Link to post Share on other sites
diablo01 0 Posted January 24, 2006 Share Posted January 24, 2006 Risk to reward ratio:Risk = 1/40 2.5% chance to achieve goal (return of 20 million on investment of 1 million)Return on investment = (Gross return – Initial Investment, 20 million – 1 million) = 19 million : 19 million/1 million = 1900% return on investment : Assuming your initial investment is sunk costs.Risk to reward ratio 2.5% or .025 x 1900% = 47.5% where 100% is a break even proposition. Assuming no tax liability - HAHA big assumption. So you are a little less than a 2 to 1 dog for your money BUT your getting 19-1 pot odds,Can’t forget about the pot odds!Go for it! Link to post Share on other sites
Jeff 0 Posted January 24, 2006 Share Posted January 24, 2006 oh fcpers i was in my bus. org. class today and this problem came up. in short it was just asking if you should advise a partnership to put up one million dollars to make 20 million but the probablility of making that 20 million is only one in forty.well us poker guys know that the answer is no. because a one in forty chance to make 20 million is only worth 500k bet in the long run to break even, so the invest appears to be a losing on in the long run.well alot of the class didnt quite understand the logic so after class he asked me if i could find a very simple way to explain this.so do you guys have a very elementary way of explaining this1 in 40 means you should get 40X odds. It has nothing to do with breaking even in the long run. The deal as is plays 20:1 for 40:1 odds Link to post Share on other sites
speedz99 145 Posted January 24, 2006 Share Posted January 24, 2006 Wrong--you must subtract your initial investment--see my explanation above.Fullhouse7Well...it depends on how you read the question.put up one million dollars to make 20 million I read this as a $20M profit.that is correctI love being right.What law school are you in? Link to post Share on other sites
diablo01 0 Posted January 24, 2006 Share Posted January 24, 2006 All those Donks at the WSOP must need a lesson in Risk to reward ratios.They where laying $10,000 (ofcourse not the satellites but bear with me) to make approx. 4mill after taxes whichi is 400-1 on their investment IF they win (yeah right) against a field of 5600 which all things neing equal(which there not) is 5600-1 against.Donks i tell ya. If i had millions, which i dont, 1 mil to make 20 aint so bad. Link to post Share on other sites
crocd99 0 Posted January 24, 2006 Author Share Posted January 24, 2006 Wrong--you must subtract your initial investment--see my explanation above.Fullhouse7Well...it depends on how you read the question.put up one million dollars to make 20 million I read this as a $20M profit.that is correctI love being right.What law school are you in?a shi tty one. widener Link to post Share on other sites
speedz99 145 Posted January 24, 2006 Share Posted January 24, 2006 Meh...there's no such thing as a shitty law school. My girfriend is going the the application process now...fun stuff. Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Mexico 4,238 Posted January 24, 2006 Share Posted January 24, 2006 You should just tell them all not to be so stupid. That's what I would do. It's pretty simple as it is.grinder mj thinks you are funnier than me? No.I still love you though Franky boy.It is Frank isn't it?I like real names better.I wasn't even being funny. That's just what I would say. People like it when you're condescending.Actually, my real name is Caleb. I thought I told you that before, Chris.sorry CalebCaleb? Really Link to post Share on other sites
RhinestoneCowboy 2 Posted January 24, 2006 Share Posted January 24, 2006 He said simple. If they couldn't figure it out from the way he said it in class, here is what I would try.You are 1 in 40 to make 20 million. For every 40 times to pay the 1 million, you will get 20 million back once.Spending 40 million to make 20 million does not make a lot of sense. Link to post Share on other sites
turd ferguson 1 Posted January 24, 2006 Share Posted January 24, 2006 sorry CalebCaleb? ReallyMy father is a pastor. Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Mexico 4,238 Posted January 24, 2006 Share Posted January 24, 2006 sorry CalebCaleb? ReallyMy father is a pastor.Double sorry. Link to post Share on other sites
turd ferguson 1 Posted January 24, 2006 Share Posted January 24, 2006 sorry CalebCaleb? ReallyMy father is a pastor.Double sorry.I know. I don't have the heart to tell him I'm an atheist. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now