Jump to content

official kidpoker vs. dreamclown thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1 thing I notice, is when DN and him are trash talking, it seems to disrupt DreamClown's game.
One thing I notice is dishcloth keeps getting owned. By the end of these matches, DN is going to have to stake dishcloth to play 20/40 :-)
Link to post
Share on other sites
Is Daniel up $48k tonight or is that over the 3 sessions they have played?  Wasn't he up like $67k for one night?Thanks
It's 48k over the 5 sessions they've played. He was up 67k two nights ago.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Is Daniel up $48k tonight or is that over the 3 sessions they have played?  Wasn't he up like $67k for one night?Thanks
Daniel has won the 3 sessions this week, 67k, 5k, and 20k. DN is including the two losing sessions he had when he played short stacked and DC asked to rebuy which started this whole thing.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Heres my insight into the whole thing from viewing the proceedings. Correct me if I'm wrong but this is just how I see it. Parts of this thing kinda reminds me of the WPT even that ended with DN vs David Williams. Here is why I say that...Dave knew DN had his HU game down, so he completely changed in and through DN off. DN took lumps for a while before he worked out the new gear and used it against Williams. I see this happening in teh DN vs DC games. Whenever DC changes his game a little DN takes a few hits, learning clown's game, he works it out again then comes back again. Ok there were a few instaces when Clown outplayed him, and he got on a few good rolls taking a lot fo pots, but it is clear that Clown doesn't have the assets that DN does.This whole thing has shown one of DN's major strengths is working out patterns and then exploiting them. On a gear change he make take a hit but he always comes back strong. Of course I believe Williams to be a much better player than DC, however that is teh similarity I see in that DN is that good at working it out and then using that to his advantage.Opinions?

Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm not arguing that it is against the rules, only that it is considered unethical which it is!
Sadly, this is not the dumbest thing I've ever read on this forum. It deserves an honorable mention though.You see, players can (and do) get up and stop playing whenever they want to get up and stop playing. There is not some kind of moral bond between players that requires them to stay until the other person says they can go.If you are entering moral obligations at the poker table, then you must be playing Andy Black poker.
Link to post
Share on other sites

yea..... DN is completley toying with him. He's leavin earily to teach him a lesson about the re-buy comments. Those kids want there money back and they would play DN for days or until broke to get even.I think DN is using "classic" psychological warefare. When they play again, DC will be playing fast. So he can get ahead of DN early. This means that DN has a good chance to catch him bettin strong with nothing. And, if the cards cooperate, He should take more of his money next session. :D:):D On a very funny note :):club::D I bet DC's friends are reemin his arse for losin again. Thats alot of cash and it seems that DN is taking control. They can't back out because they talked so much shiaat. So, they are sweatin there position of losin a ton of money to DN.This makes me very happy 8) :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm not arguing that it is against the rules, only that it is considered unethical which it is!
Sadly, this is not the dumbest thing I've ever read on this forum. It deserves an honorable mention though.You see, players can (and do) get up and stop playing whenever they want to get up and stop playing. There is not some kind of moral bond between players that requires them to stay until the other person says they can go.If you are entering moral obligations at the poker table, then you must be playing Andy Black poker.
Does Daniel play Andy Black poker as well? I believe he wrote a blog about the new breed of online player and how they dont throw a bone. And that he would always finish off someone that he was playing if they wanted to continue playing...Honorable mention as dumbest thing you've read on the forum as well? You're right there are no ethics in poker...There is a reason that the term "hit and run" exists, no? Did I just make that one up on my own? Again, I think it's funny what DN did, but intentionally unethical, as to stick to DC from their first encounter, which I have stated before.I don't see how you can make a logical argument against that, it seems to me (from some searching), that you are a helpful member of FCP, I just think you are very wrong here. Please show me where I am wrong.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...