the defend dn at any cost people on this site are...

[DrawingDeadInDM 0]

phishforchips:YSALAPPGKYASAP

funny.....its even funnier that i think i actually know what ur trying to say....lol

You Suck At Life And Poker, Please Go Kill Yourself As Soon As Possible?Am I right?!

[Pupsta 0]

phishforchips:YSALAPPGKYASAP

funny.....its even funnier that i think i actually know what ur trying to say....lol

You Suck At Life And Poker, Please Go Kill Yourself As Soon As Possible?Am I right?!

i got "you should ampuate little appendage, preferably penis, go kill yourself and shoot a porcupine"but you may be correc

[DrawingDeadInDM 0]

phishforchips:YSALAPPGKYASAP

funny.....its even funnier that i think i actually know what ur trying to say....lol

You Suck At Life And Poker, Please Go Kill Yourself As Soon As Possible?Am I right?!

i got "you should ampuate little appendage, preferably penis, go kill yourself and shoot a porcupine"but you may be correc

I like your's better.

[bigcoled 1]

HEE-larious.  They will defend him on any issue no matter what.  Take the dreamclown issue.  99% of the players on the net would have requested DN reload or look for anotehr game as the positive expectation is severely diminished when gambling to win a little stack vs. the possibility of losing your stack to him on a few lucky draw outs.  Yet you DN hiney lickers argue other wise!  Its hilarious.

HI, welcome to the Official Website of Daniel Negreanu, Professional Poker Player, feel free to go fuck yourself...

[Jeff 0]

90% of the kids on this forum have a man crush on Daniel.

[fleung22 1]

I respect Daniel and check out the FCP all the time.However, if I had a chance to say I broke DN in a poker game I'd continue to play and grab the last $5K...guess I must represent that 1%.

[krup24 0]

99% is absurd, I'd say around 60%

[alf13 0]

90% of the kids on this forum have a man crush on Daniel.

Well....let me see....1. He's rich2. He got rich playing a game we all love.3. He is very well behaved at the poker table.4. He has an electric personality.5. He has boyish good looks.Yeah...I'm hot for him.

[Royal_Tour 0]

HEE-larious.  They will defend him on any issue no matter what.  Take the dreamclown issue.  99% of the players on the net would have requested DN reload or look for anotehr game as the positive expectation is severely diminished when gambling to win a little stack vs. the possibility of losing your stack to him on a few lucky draw outs.  Yet you DN hiney lickers argue other wise!  Its hilarious.

Phishy, haven't seen u 4 awhile, r u still crushing the nl games for 100BB/hr...or did the imaginary tables dry up?

cashed out about 8K. Now killing the Bodog omaha tables. You still jealous?

you're an idiot.you play low limits, you need that 8k to go up in limits, man you suck.seriously, you're an idiot, youreally shouldnt have cashed thatout, arent you supposed to play just blaze heads up?

[commoncents 0]

99% of the time you are 60% retarded

[BadBeatBou 0]

HEE-larious.  They will defend him on any issue no matter what.  Take the dreamclown issue.  99% of the players on the net would have requested DN reload or look for anotehr game as the positive expectation is severely diminished when gambling to win a little stack vs. the possibility of losing your stack to him on a few lucky draw outs.  Yet you DN hiney lickers argue other wise!  Its hilarious.

Phishy, haven't seen u 4 awhile, r u still crushing the nl games for 100BB/hr...or did the imaginary tables dry up?

cashed out about 8K. Now killing the Bodog omaha tables. You still jealous?

you're an idiot.you play low limits, you need that 8k to go up in limits, man you suck.seriously, you're an idiot, youreally shouldnt have cashed thatout, arent you supposed to play just blaze heads up?

He will now be killing the play money tables

[Ron_Mexico 4,219]

90% of the kids on this forum have a man crush on Daniel.

Well....let me see....1. He's rich2. He got rich playing a game we all love.3. He is very well behaved at the poker table.4. He has an electric personality.5. He has boyish good looks.Yeah...I'm hot for him.

Me too. I think Alf and I should try to run a duece on him.It must suck to be a celebrity if you have thin skin.

[DunkinDonuts 0]

90% of the kids on this forum have a man crush on Daniel.

There's a fine line between appreciation and adulation, and I don't think the majority of posters here cross it. Here's a poker pro who's achieved celebrity status, and he takes the time to set up a Web site that gives poker junkies a forum to discuss poker and make a few friends. Even if you're a skeptic who thinks this site was launched with a view to making money off of it in the future, you'd be a fool not to acknowledge that Daniel is more down to earth than he needs to be to run his business affairs.I think what creates the dichotomy here is that on one hand you have a bunch of appreciative poker fans who respect a guy who makes himself accessible. We're probably even willing to give him the benefit of the doubt in these flame wars, because we assume from his demeanor that he's a decent guy.However, we are less likely to give the same benefit of the doubt to newcomers whose sole motive appears to be to make a name for themselves by taking potshots at nice guy who's already earned our respect. Perhaps if you had a genuine philosophical disagreement with Daniel, you'd note that he's taken time in the past to participate in these discussions. If you think you can beat him or exploit a potential weakness, do it quietly. But don't make the mistake of assuming that you can elevate yourself at his expense on this forum. Calling him out is a form of baiting, not discussing, and it's an obvious sign of disrespect that he has done nothing to deserve. So, yes, in that regard, we have his back.Oh yeah, and drink my coffee.

[gcirons 0]

I can see the point that one might like one to reload in limit heads up -in no limit I would just take the rest of their chips - however, I do believe that sportsmanship dictates that you play on.

[Lobo 0]

You know what?? I really want to see a movie about "Christmas Monkeys Fighting"That would be cool.

[ShakeZuma 585]

90% of the kids on this forum have a man crush on Daniel.

There's a fine line between appreciation and adulation, and I don't think the majority of posters here cross it. Here's a poker pro who's achieved celebrity status, and he takes the time to set up a Web site that gives poker junkies a forum to discuss poker and make a few friends. Even if you're a skeptic who thinks this site was launched with a view to making money off of it in the future, you'd be a fool not to acknowledge that Daniel is more down to earth than he needs to be to run his business affairs.I think what creates the dichotomy here is that on one hand you have a bunch of appreciative poker fans who respect a guy who makes himself accessible. We're probably even willing to give him the benefit of the doubt in these flame wars, because we assume from his demeanor that he's a decent guy.However, we are less likely to give the same benefit of the doubt to newcomers whose sole motive appears to be to make a name for themselves by taking potshots at nice guy who's already earned our respect. Perhaps if you had a genuine philosophical disagreement with Daniel, you'd note that he's taken time in the past to participate in these discussions. If you think you can beat him or exploit a potential weakness, do it quietly. But don't make the mistake of assuming that you can elevate yourself at his expense on this forum. Calling him out is a form of baiting, not discussing, and it's an obvious sign of disrespect that he has done nothing to deserve. So, yes, in that regard, we have his back.Oh yeah, and drink my coffee.

excellent.

[supertouch 0]

90% of the kids on this forum have a man crush on Daniel.

There's a fine line between appreciation and adulation, and I don't think the majority of posters here cross it. Here's a poker pro who's achieved celebrity status, and he takes the time to set up a Web site that gives poker junkies a forum to discuss poker and make a few friends. Even if you're a skeptic who thinks this site was launched with a view to making money off of it in the future, you'd be a fool not to acknowledge that Daniel is more down to earth than he needs to be to run his business affairs.I think what creates the dichotomy here is that on one hand you have a bunch of appreciative poker fans who respect a guy who makes himself accessible. We're probably even willing to give him the benefit of the doubt in these flame wars, because we assume from his demeanor that he's a decent guy.However, we are less likely to give the same benefit of the doubt to newcomers whose sole motive appears to be to make a name for themselves by taking potshots at nice guy who's already earned our respect. Perhaps if you had a genuine philosophical disagreement with Daniel, you'd note that he's taken time in the past to participate in these discussions. If you think you can beat him or exploit a potential weakness, do it quietly. But don't make the mistake of assuming that you can elevate yourself at his expense on this forum. Calling him out is a form of baiting, not discussing, and it's an obvious sign of disrespect that he has done nothing to deserve. So, yes, in that regard, we have his back.Oh yeah, and drink my coffee.

i think that pretty much sums it up.

[CaneBrain 95]

You know what??  I really want to see a movie about "Christmas Monkeys Fighting"That would be cool.

post of the year.

[CaneBrain 95]

HEE-larious.  They will defend him on any issue no matter what.  Take the dreamclown issue.  99% of the players on the net would have requested DN reload or look for anotehr game as the positive expectation is severely diminished when gambling to win a little stack vs. the possibility of losing your stack to him on a few lucky draw outs.  Yet you DN hiney lickers argue other wise!  Its hilarious.

Lets break this down analytically folks.....Grossly exaggerated statements? check.Made up exaggerated stats? checkrambling, incoherent explanation? check.the use of "hiney lickers" made me chuckle though....so kudos.

[lew189 0]

90% of the kids on this forum have a man crush on Daniel.

There's a fine line between appreciation and adulation, and I don't think the majority of posters here cross it. Here's a poker pro who's achieved celebrity status, and he takes the time to set up a Web site that gives poker junkies a forum to discuss poker and make a few friends. Even if you're a skeptic who thinks this site was launched with a view to making money off of it in the future, you'd be a fool not to acknowledge that Daniel is more down to earth than he needs to be to run his business affairs.I think what creates the dichotomy here is that on one hand you have a bunch of appreciative poker fans who respect a guy who makes himself accessible. We're probably even willing to give him the benefit of the doubt in these flame wars, because we assume from his demeanor that he's a decent guy.However, we are less likely to give the same benefit of the doubt to newcomers whose sole motive appears to be to make a name for themselves by taking potshots at nice guy who's already earned our respect. Perhaps if you had a genuine philosophical disagreement with Daniel, you'd note that he's taken time in the past to participate in these discussions. If you think you can beat him or exploit a potential weakness, do it quietly. But don't make the mistake of assuming that you can elevate yourself at his expense on this forum. Calling him out is a form of baiting, not discussing, and it's an obvious sign of disrespect that he has done nothing to deserve. So, yes, in that regard, we have his back.Oh yeah, and drink my coffee.

excellent.

Agreed. This post sums up my feelings nicely. Good work, Dunkin Donuts. On the coffee, too...

[lew189 0]

90% of the kids on this forum have a man crush on Daniel.

There's a fine line between appreciation and adulation, and I don't think the majority of posters here cross it. Here's a poker pro who's achieved celebrity status, and he takes the time to set up a Web site that gives poker junkies a forum to discuss poker and make a few friends. Even if you're a skeptic who thinks this site was launched with a view to making money off of it in the future, you'd be a fool not to acknowledge that Daniel is more down to earth than he needs to be to run his business affairs.I think what creates the dichotomy here is that on one hand you have a bunch of appreciative poker fans who respect a guy who makes himself accessible. We're probably even willing to give him the benefit of the doubt in these flame wars, because we assume from his demeanor that he's a decent guy.However, we are less likely to give the same benefit of the doubt to newcomers whose sole motive appears to be to make a name for themselves by taking potshots at nice guy who's already earned our respect. Perhaps if you had a genuine philosophical disagreement with Daniel, you'd note that he's taken time in the past to participate in these discussions. If you think you can beat him or exploit a potential weakness, do it quietly. But don't make the mistake of assuming that you can elevate yourself at his expense on this forum. Calling him out is a form of baiting, not discussing, and it's an obvious sign of disrespect that he has done nothing to deserve. So, yes, in that regard, we have his back.Oh yeah, and drink my coffee.

excellent.

Agreed. This post sums up my feelings nicely. Good work, Dunkin Donuts. On the coffee, too...

[AKoffsuit 0]

90% of the kids on this forum have a man crush on Daniel.

There's a fine line between appreciation and adulation, and I don't think the majority of posters here cross it. Here's a poker pro who's achieved celebrity status, and he takes the time to set up a Web site that gives poker junkies a forum to discuss poker and make a few friends. Even if you're a skeptic who thinks this site was launched with a view to making money off of it in the future, you'd be a fool not to acknowledge that Daniel is more down to earth than he needs to be to run his business affairs.I think what creates the dichotomy here is that on one hand you have a bunch of appreciative poker fans who respect a guy who makes himself accessible. We're probably even willing to give him the benefit of the doubt in these flame wars, because we assume from his demeanor that he's a decent guy.However, we are less likely to give the same benefit of the doubt to newcomers whose sole motive appears to be to make a name for themselves by taking potshots at nice guy who's already earned our respect. Perhaps if you had a genuine philosophical disagreement with Daniel, you'd note that he's taken time in the past to participate in these discussions. If you think you can beat him or exploit a potential weakness, do it quietly. But don't make the mistake of assuming that you can elevate yourself at his expense on this forum. Calling him out is a form of baiting, not discussing, and it's an obvious sign of disrespect that he has done nothing to deserve. So, yes, in that regard, we have his back.Oh yeah, and drink my coffee.

Nice Post DunkinDonuts. Well said!

[THIR13EN 0]

Again not much to add, but there is not muchbeing said here...