top ten nlh players ever

[SLEEPYCHIEF 0]

1.Johnny Moss2.Stu Ungar3.Johnny Chan4.Doyle Brunson5.Phil Hellmuth6.T.J. Cloutier7.Phil Ivey8.Eric Seidel9.Dan Harrington10.Daniel Negreanu

[ziggy587 0]

What...no Moneymaker...WTF :shock:

[allinbluff35 0]

1. allinbluff352. allinbluff352. allinbluff354. Lucifer5. Al Bundy6. Poppa Smurf7. Burt Reynolds8. Lloyd Christmas9. Chris Farley10. Jenna Jameson

[....Ian.... 0]

think about it ...who are the 5 best rappers?Dylon, Dylon, Dylon, Dylon, and Dylondo these completely 'best ever' subjective topics get old for anyone else?

[Devilkin 0]

1. Wayne Gretzky2. Bobby Orr3. Mario Lemieux . . .oh sorry, thought you said NHL players. . .

[Dirtydutch 8]

1.Johnny Moss2.Stu Ungar3.Johnny Chan4.Doyle Brunson5.Phil Hellmuth6.T.J. Cloutier7.Phil Ivey8.Eric Seidel9.Dan Harrington10.Daniel Negreanu

How many of these have you seen play? I'll bet you haven't seen one long enough to judge.

[alf13 0]

That list sucks....No Layne Flack?

[Dirtydutch 8]

My list:1) SLEEPYCHIEF2) ziggy5873)allinbluff354)....Ian....5)Devilkin6)Dirtydutch7)alf138)kers29)Teph10) The_Heist

[kers2 0]

8) MackDubbs19

[Teph 0]

1.Johnny Moss2.Stu Ungar3.Johnny Chan4.Doyle Brunson5.Phil Hellmuth6.T.J. Cloutier7.Phil Ivey8.Eric Seidel9.Dan Harrington10.Daniel Negreanu

How many of these have you seen play? I'll bet you haven't seen one long enough to judge.

Finally somebody gets it, and it was a freakin pirate.OP, please do something useful other than spit off old names that you heard were amazing. So many people are quick to state how "good" people are when they see < .001% of their play. How the hell do you know? PLEASE stop being a stupid fanboy and spitting off all old timer names. You have no real evidence to their play other than word of mouth. Solution #1: Don't post these stupid listsSolution #2: If you insist on posting stupid lists, be original. I have spent too much of my life responding to this already.

[The_Heist 0]

I always laugh when I hear that whole "you never saw them play, so you can't judge" argument.Look, pal, I never saw Bill Russel play either, but I can tell you with absolute certainty he's one of the best rebounders of all-time.

[The_Heist 0]

I never saw Babe Ruth or Ty Cobb play either, but, again, I will say with absolute CERTAINTY they are respectively two of the best hitters of all-time.

[Teph 0]

I always laugh when I hear that whole "you never saw them play, so you can't judge" argument.Look, pal, I never saw Bill Russel play either, but I can tell you with absolute certainty he's one of the best rebounders of all-time.

You can say that because all of his play was recorded and actually seen by people you moron.

[Dirtydutch 8]

I always laugh when I hear that whole "you never saw them play, so you can't judge" argument.Look, pal, I never saw Bill Russel play either, but I can tell you with absolute certainty he's one of the best rebounders of all-time.

Poker is a game were skill is only seen after many. many hours, day, even years of play. Basketball isn't.

[Teph 0]

I never saw Babe Ruth or Ty Cobb play either, but, again, I will say with absolute CERTAINTY they are respectively two of the best hitters of all-time.

Interesting point here. If you were to make a list of the top 10 hitters ever in baseball, how would you arrange it?According to statistical proof I would assume.Now make a top 10 of poker players. How are you to arrange it?According to statistical proof I would assume.Oh, you don't HAVE that, oops.I appreciate your argument, but be logical here.

[The_Heist 0]

I always laugh when I hear that whole "you never saw them play, so you can't judge" argument.Look, pal, I never saw Bill Russel play either, but I can tell you with absolute certainty he's one of the best rebounders of all-time.

You can say that because all of his play was recorded and actually seen by people you moron.

Oh, really? ALL of his play was recorded? You dumb ****ing, insipid, fool. ALL of his play was definitely NOT recorded, you filthy frog****. People can deduce based on stats and historical records.I suppose Ty Cobb's and Babe Ruth's games were recorded, as well?I hate peasants.You're so dumb I bet you went to public school.

[GhostfaceKillah 0]

I always laugh when I hear that whole "you never saw them play, so you can't judge" argument.Look, pal, I never saw Bill Russel play either, but I can tell you with absolute certainty he's one of the best rebounders of all-time.

You can say that because all of his play was recorded and actually seen by people you moron.

Oh, really? ALL of his play was recorded? You dumb censored, insipid, fool. ALL of his play was definitely NOT recorded, you filthy censored. People can deduce based on stats and historical records.I suppose Ty Cobb's and Babe Ruth's games were recorded, as well?I hate peasants.You're so dumb I bet you went to public school.

What does public school have to do with anything you friggin tool.I understand your point but you dont have to be a damn child about it. Someone should change the title to "Arguably the The top 10 NLH of all time"

[The_Heist 0]

I never saw Babe Ruth or Ty Cobb play either, but, again, I will say with absolute CERTAINTY they are respectively two of the best hitters of all-time.

Interesting point here. If you were to make a list of the top 10 hitters ever in baseball, how would you arrange it?According to statistical proof I would assume.Now make a top 10 of poker players. How are you to arrange it?According to statistical proof I would assume.Oh, you don't HAVE that, oops.I appreciate your argument, but be logical here.

Yep, no 'statistical proof,' you're correct. Because WSOP results are not STATISTICS, right? And the other countless tournaments are not an example of written historical records? Right. Your argument is the same as the proletariat on this board.

[Teph 0]

ALL of his play was definitely NOT recorded, you filthy censored.

People can deduce based on stats and historical records.

I now hope you see how stupid you are, nh.

[theredpill99 0]

No Carlos Mortensen ? That guy is a beast on the NL table.

[Teph 0]

I never saw Babe Ruth or Ty Cobb play either, but, again, I will say with absolute CERTAINTY they are respectively two of the best hitters of all-time.

Interesting point here. If you were to make a list of the top 10 hitters ever in baseball, how would you arrange it?According to statistical proof I would assume.Now make a top 10 of poker players. How are you to arrange it?According to statistical proof I would assume.Oh, you don't HAVE that, oops.I appreciate your argument, but be logical here.

Yep, no 'statistical proof,' you're correct. Because WSOP results are not STATISTICS, right? And the other countless tournaments are not an example of written historical records? Right. Your argument is the same as the proletariat on this board.

I wish they had something like a Cash game, rather than tournament style poker. Phew, then we could play all year!(sw)

[The_Heist 0]

ALL of his play was definitely NOT recorded, you filthy censored.

People can deduce based on stats and historical records.

I now hope you see how stupid you are, nh.

WOW, so this is what a public school education gets you these days, huh?Most of Russel's games were not VIDEO recorded, hence, not many people actually SAW him play. Yes, his stats were recorded by sports writers who were actually at the game. In other words, most intelligent people can make logical deductions based on WRITTEN recorded statistics, which was my point to beging with, gay-wad.

[The_Heist 0]

I never saw Babe Ruth or Ty Cobb play either, but, again, I will say with absolute CERTAINTY they are respectively two of the best hitters of all-time.

Interesting point here. If you were to make a list of the top 10 hitters ever in baseball, how would you arrange it?According to statistical proof I would assume.Now make a top 10 of poker players. How are you to arrange it?According to statistical proof I would assume.Oh, you don't HAVE that, oops.I appreciate your argument, but be logical here.

Yep, no 'statistical proof,' you're correct. Because WSOP results are not STATISTICS, right? And the other countless tournaments are not an example of written historical records? Right. Your argument is the same as the proletariat on this board.

I wish they had something like a Cash game, rather than tournament style poker. Phew, then we could play all year!(sw)

Sarcasm is the lowest for of humour, fyi. And, what are you getting at, anyway? Maybe, at some point, you had something intelligent to say but somewhere in the nerves between your brain and your hands it turned into non-sensical bullshit. You sound like a moron. Your ability (or lack of) to get across a point suggests you have english skills worse than that of a Mexican.

[The_Heist 0]

btw, teph, Please do tell me where you went to school as I'd like to write them a letter reprimanding them for your lack of logistic skills. There is no limit on my Amex Centurion card nor the amount of semen that you can ingest.

[GhostfaceKillah 0]

I never saw Babe Ruth or Ty Cobb play either, but, again, I will say with absolute CERTAINTY they are respectively two of the best hitters of all-time.

Interesting point here. If you were to make a list of the top 10 hitters ever in baseball, how would you arrange it?According to statistical proof I would assume.Now make a top 10 of poker players. How are you to arrange it?According to statistical proof I would assume.Oh, you don't HAVE that, oops.I appreciate your argument, but be logical here.

Yep, no 'statistical proof,' you're correct. Because WSOP results are not STATISTICS, right? And the other countless tournaments are not an example of written historical records? Right. Your argument is the same as the proletariat on this board.

I wish they had something like a Cash game, rather than tournament style poker. Phew, then we could play all year!(sw)

Sarcasm is the lowest for of humour, fyi. And, what are you getting at, anyway? or what some jackoff in a censored bookstore is wearing Maybe, at some point, you had something intelligent to say but somewhere in the nerves between your brain and your hands it turned into non-sensical censored. You sound like a moron. Your ability (or lack of) to get across a point suggests you have english skills worse than that of a Mexican.

Sarcasm is the lowest for of humour FYI? You are about the biggest jerkoff ive come across on this forum. Why dont you save yourself the embarrassment and throw away your computer. As long as its alright with everyone else, im gonna hi-jack everyone of this guys threads until he just leaves.