The Enforcer 0 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 i'm gonna go 5'4 118 Link to post Share on other sites
CodyHartman 0 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 Really? There goes the smaller girl theory. I'd need a stronger tranquilizer gun to take you down. I'm kidding of course. Nice pic.Still small. Just not as small as you thought. :wink:I had you at 5'2 around 110lbs.At second glance, I figure 5'6" 142lbs Still very nice. I'm good right? Your impressed? I know. It's what I do.Ron I seriously hope your kidding. You can see her collar bones. Just b/c she has good sized breastesistsss (In living color), doesnt make her voluptious. I'd say 115lbs at the most. Link to post Share on other sites
tweeds07 0 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 Good luck Patrick :!:OK Miss now what is that avatar supposed to do for all these horny fukkers around here. You sure stirring the pot up.Not that I mind the avatar of course... :wink: :wink: :wink:It's only temporary. Showing off what I bought in Vegas. (the shirt)Tig ol' Bitties!eh, I'm gathering by the headshot she is a smaller girl. One kid, they don't look fake. I'd say 34Bby writing the eh, I'm just saying they aren't big. Not to offend Idaho.Hmm, I wasn't joking at all... Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Mexico 4,220 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 Really? There goes the smaller girl theory. I'd need a stronger tranquilizer gun to take you down. I'm kidding of course. Nice pic.Still small. Just not as small as you thought. :wink:I had you at 5'2 around 110lbs.At second glance, I figure 5'6" 142lbs Still very nice. I'm good right? Your impressed? I know. It's what I do. :shock: now i'm scaredEither you are patronizing me or I'm pretty damn close. Since my internet ego is so big, I'll go with the latter. Perfect stomach for a fresh batch of Ron's famous stomach pancakes. Good for you. Link to post Share on other sites
missIdaho 1 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 "shee pointed too her.. booobiieeesss"NOW STOP HIJACKING MY THREAD YOU WHURESSorry.Good Job Patrick Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Mexico 4,220 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 142 is not heavy. If a girl has any kind of height to her and isn't rail skinny, she will be close to this or maybe a little less. I may have overshot a little, but I was going by the 38 size. That means she has a wider back. I was married for 4 years. I can guess womens weight pretty well. I'm going off limited info. Just a fun game for me. Link to post Share on other sites
missIdaho 1 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 142 is not heavy. If a girl has any kind of height to her and isn't rail skinny, she will be close to this or maybe a little less. I may have overshot a little, but I was going by the 38 size. That means she has a wider back. I was married for 4 years. I can guess womens weight pretty well. I'm going off limited info. Just a fun game for me.Correct at 5'6". Weight is high , but excellent job considering you are judgung by this picture. :clap: Link to post Share on other sites
Allie 0 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 Date / Time: 2005-09-29 20:03:00 Player Amount Table Seat Frank Sinopoli $739,000 0 0 Freddy Deeb $655,000 0 0 Kathrine Jackson $489,500 0 0 Stacy Matuson $486,000 0 0 James Van Alstyne $406,000 0 0 Richard Knucklehead Freire $340,000 0 0 James English $296,000 0 0 Matthew Bell $279,500 0 0 Devin Porter $254,500 0 0 AVERAGE $248,846 0 0 Barry Greenstein $248,000 0 0 Claudio Di Prinzio $238,500 0 0 Josh Schlein $236,000 0 0 Todd Keikoan $201,500 0 0 Chris Bell $197,500 0 0 Aron Chugani $175,000 0 0 Alex Wendell $171,000 0 0 Fabrice Soulier $167,000 0 0 Nick Adanakis $166,500 0 0 Johan Storakers $150,500 0 0 Steve Hohn $147,000 0 0 Andrew Wiggins $90,500 0 0 Patrick Johson $85,000 0 0 Steve Brandvold $84,000 0 0 Scott Serafin $68,000 0 0 Robert Border $63,000 0 0 Steve Barclay $43,000 0 0 Date / Time: 2005-09-29 19:01:00 Player Amount Link to post Share on other sites
Pupsta 0 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 "shee pointed too her.. booobiieeesss"NOW STOP HIJACKING MY THREAD YOU WHURESoh my god, she did! Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Mexico 4,220 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 142 is not heavy. If a girl has any kind of height to her and isn't rail skinny, she will be close to this or maybe a little less. I may have overshot a little, but I was going by the 38 size. That means she has a wider back. I was married for 4 years. I can guess womens weight pretty well. I'm going off limited info. Just a fun game for me.Correct at 5'6". Weight is high , but excellent job considering you are judgung by this picture. :clap:Thanks. I always guess a tad higher on the weight. Online its b/c lack of info, B&M its to take the girl down a peg. Kidding. Link to post Share on other sites
powerpoker 0 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 damn i was just going to post the amouts up there allie...you beat me...oh well....good luck tomorrow patrick 8) Link to post Share on other sites
PotDragon 0 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 Hope he finds some cards early tomorrow. Damn good job !! :dance: Link to post Share on other sites
Allie 0 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 142 is not heavy. If a girl has any kind of height to her and isn't rail skinny, she will be close to this or maybe a little less. I may have overshot a little, but I was going by the 38 size. That means she has a wider back. I was married for 4 years. I can guess womens weight pretty well. I'm going off limited info. Just a fun game for me.Correct at 5'6". Weight is high , but excellent job considering you are judgung by this picture. :clap:Thanks. I always guess a tad higher on the weight. Online its b/c lack of info, B&M its to take the girl down a peg. Kidding.Nice. Link to post Share on other sites
missIdaho 1 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 Awesome Patrick. Good Luck tomorrow 8) Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Mexico 4,220 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 142 is not heavy. If a girl has any kind of height to her and isn't rail skinny, she will be close to this or maybe a little less. I may have overshot a little, but I was going by the 38 size. That means she has a wider back. I was married for 4 years. I can guess womens weight pretty well. I'm going off limited info. Just a fun game for me.Correct at 5'6". Weight is high , but excellent job considering you are judgung by this picture. :clap:Thanks. I always guess a tad higher on the weight. Online its b/c lack of info, B&M its to take the girl down a peg. Kidding.Nice.TYGood luck Patrick. My the cards be with you. Link to post Share on other sites
CodyHartman 0 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 I always thought his name was Jackson, not Johnson??? I mean c'mon PMJackson21 is his screenname. HMM must be a typo. Too bad his first name isnt Kathrine. :wink: Link to post Share on other sites
Royal_Tour 0 Posted September 30, 2005 Author Share Posted September 30, 2005 just talking to the man right now ..he said he has been pushing but getting no calls, hense the reason he is short stacked Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Mexico 4,220 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 just talking to the man right now ..he said he has been pushing but getting no calls, hence the reason he is short stackedFYP sweat pea Link to post Share on other sites
Royal_Tour 0 Posted September 30, 2005 Author Share Posted September 30, 2005 i'm canadian eh, we do things differently Link to post Share on other sites
PrtyPSux 0 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 GL DUUDE! Link to post Share on other sites
tweeds07 0 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 Patrick is coming....I swear...and for anyone who cares, SDouble is still in (Josh Schlein) Link to post Share on other sites
na3r0k 0 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 He's got some work ahead of him, but he can do it. Good Luck take down first place!!! Link to post Share on other sites
CodyHartman 0 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 He's got a pretty good table for tomrrow too. 2 stacks at his table are shorter (one by only 1k but still), and the guys on his left and right arent the big stacks. One double up and he's right back in it. Link to post Share on other sites
WorkYou 0 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 .... Link to post Share on other sites
PMJackson21 0 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 I always thought his name was Jackson, not Johnson??? I mean c'mon PMJackson21 is his screenname. HMM must be a typo. Too bad his first name isnt Kathrine. :wink:Johnson? WTF??!? :-)No, it's Jackson...THe writing on my chip bag was probably messy.Anyway, thanks all for the support. Hopefully I can double up early tomorrow and be able to be in contention. As it is, the only move I have available to me is al in or fold at the moment. With 8x the BB, I can't make a raise other then all in. Deeb us at my table with a huge stack, and Josh Schlein on my left is SDouble from Stars (good player, very aggressive).Oh, and I also agree - very nice Miss Idaho. :-)Patrick Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now