3-betting lite? (lhe)

[econ_tim 0]

Party Poker 1/2 Hold'em (9 max, 6 handed) converterPreflop: econ_tim is BB with 9:spade:, K:heart:. 1 fold, SB completes, econ_tim checks.Flop: (3 SB) 4:spade:, K:spade:, 2:heart: (3 players)SB checks, econ_tim bets, MP calls, SB folds.Turn: (2.50 BB) 4:club: (2 players)econ_tim bets, MP calls.River: (4.50 BB) 9:diamond: (2 players)econ_tim bets . . . Villain is loose aggressive preflop, but somewhat passive postflop. Still, I don't know why he's raising the river unless he was slow playing trips on the turn.

[JesseW316 0]

I would have just called the river raise. It just seems too screwed up from a so-called "passive" post-flop player.

[looshle 6]

Still, I don't know why he's raising the river unless he was slow playing trips on the turn.So why 3 bet it with 2 pair? Just call the river raise, your hand improved but not by that much.

[econ_tim 0]

So why 3 bet it with 2 pair? Just call the river raise, your hand improved but not by that much.

I just think his raise is suspicious. Of course it would make sense if he had 4-x or 99, but I think he is silly enough to raise something else.

[zimmer4141 0]

I think 3-betting the river is the right play. You are only beat by a 4, which he may have, but I think he could make this play with any K, so I think there is value in raising the river.

[wrto4556 0]

i think it is a bit light. You have to have the best hand 3/4 of the time to 3-bet here.Ive also become less loose/aggressive recently.

[Smasharoo 0]

Ive also become less loose/aggressive recently.Stop giving weak tight advice!How's that feel, baby