PestoSauce 0 Posted August 17, 2005 Share Posted August 17, 2005 For all you multi tablers, a few simple questions: I can comfortably play 3-4 limit hold'em tables on PS. But for all those that play 8 or more tables at once, aren't you just playing your cards and nothing else? I mean, whatever happened to "playing your opponent". With 4 tables, you can at least track playing styles, weakies, etc... It just seems it would get complex with 8 tables. Also, I'd think NL players would have to play fewer talbes. any input is appreciated. Thanks. Link to post Share on other sites
DDiabolical 0 Posted August 17, 2005 Share Posted August 17, 2005 This is true. With 8 tables it becomes extremely difficult to follow your opponent plays. But the people who do 8-tables have usually been playing a long time, and with the same people, and therefore can have quite comprehensive notes on their opponents. While most decisions are probably based on their cards & the board, they can also look up the notes of their opponent when it isn't immediately obvious what the correct play would be. Link to post Share on other sites
Kendren 1 Posted August 17, 2005 Share Posted August 17, 2005 8-tablers also tend to be more mathematical, odds type players that don't rely on player reads as much. And there's nothing wrong or right about that, it just is. Sklansky and Ferguson have much the same characteristics. Link to post Share on other sites
speedz99 145 Posted August 17, 2005 Share Posted August 17, 2005 Pokertracker. Link to post Share on other sites
Smasharoo 0 Posted August 17, 2005 Share Posted August 17, 2005 8-tablers also tend to be more mathematical, odds type players that don't rely on player reads as much.No.Never met anyone that 8 tables, huh? Link to post Share on other sites
PestoSauce 0 Posted August 17, 2005 Author Share Posted August 17, 2005 Do 8 tablers HAVE to have 2 monitors? I would think that one monitor wouldn't be enough. Link to post Share on other sites
MarkACE 0 Posted August 17, 2005 Share Posted August 17, 2005 For all you multi tablers, a few simple questions: I can comfortably play 3-4 limit hold'em tables on PS. But for all those that play 8 or more tables at once, aren't you just playing your cards and nothing else? I mean, whatever happened to "playing your opponent". With 4 tables, you can at least track playing styles, weakies, etc... It just seems it would get complex with 8 tables. Also, I'd think NL players would have to play fewer talbes. any input is appreciated. Thanks.Even 4 tables is hard to follow each player...The only ones i pick up on while 4 tabling are the donk's that make the buddy lists.... Link to post Share on other sites
DaBruins 0 Posted August 17, 2005 Share Posted August 17, 2005 i'm glad you had to specify ONLINE multi-tabling. Still trying to imagine Doyle running around at a B&M playing on 8 tables. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now