Oziumrules 0 Posted July 20, 2005 Author Share Posted July 20, 2005 Guns and roses where a moderate band but they had no soul! Nirvana and the Chillis rules the early Nineties late eighties. Fusciante has none of his real teeth for christ sake heroin city!!! then uses that to write under the bridge, now thats soul thats rockn roll!!...... nearly forgot bout the pixies!!!! Hey..... Been trying to meet you......Didnt Anthony Kiedis write Under The Bridge? Link to post Share on other sites
Bigredlorry 0 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 Nah fusciante, listen to his solo album fro m when chilis disowned him he wrote the riff and vast majority of song Link to post Share on other sites
Oziumrules 0 Posted July 20, 2005 Author Share Posted July 20, 2005 Nah fusciante, listen to his solo album fro m when chilis disowned him he wrote the riff and vast majority of songCheck this site out...http://www.songfacts.com/detail.lasso?id=2369 Link to post Share on other sites
Bigredlorry 0 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 actually on that same album he plays scartissue from californiacation except its not the same lyrics just the riff and some 8 year old girl whose mum was a junkie hooker that fusciante knew sang these crazy non sensical words over it. that whole album completely off the wall Link to post Share on other sites
NortonFan 0 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 Anthony wrote under the bridge. I watch VH1's behind the music, don't question me. Link to post Share on other sites
Bigredlorry 0 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 cheers ozium rules sweet site, ive been telling ppl fusciante wrote that for years!!! they mention soul to squeeze as well thats such an ace song Link to post Share on other sites
Bigredlorry 0 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 chill ozium u watch to much vh1 sorry!!! More people vote for the who please!! and why aint the hendrix experience and iggy and the stooges up there this pole could do with alterations Link to post Share on other sites
Oziumrules 0 Posted July 20, 2005 Author Share Posted July 20, 2005 chill ozium u watch to much vh1 sorry!!! More people vote for the who please!! and why aint the hendrix experience and iggy and the stooges up there this pole could do with alterationsThat wasnt me who said they watched VH1.... Link to post Share on other sites
lrlslo 0 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 Guns and roses where a moderate band but they had no soul! Nirvana and the Chillis rules the early Nineties late eighties. Fusciante has none of his real teeth for christ sake heroin city!!! then uses that to write under the bridge, now thats soul thats rockn roll!!...... nearly forgot bout the pixies!!!! Hey..... Been trying to meet you......That is what made them great!!! They were to drunk/high/whatever else you can be to have soul. Real Rock stars drink, do to many drugs, and care to much about groupies and beating people up to have soul.But Nirvana was a great band as well. Chili Peppers have kinda gone down in my book over the last couple years. Its like Jerry Rice... you were the greatest, please stop! Link to post Share on other sites
Smasharoo 0 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 1. The Beatles were a pop band.2. The Graefull dead are a jam band.3. Anyone who doesn't realize that The Who is the greatest rock band of all time is an idiot. Link to post Share on other sites
avsfan 0 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 Guns and roses where a moderate band but they had no soul! Nirvana and the Chillis rules the early Nineties late eighties. Fusciante has none of his real teeth for christ sake heroin city!!! then uses that to write under the bridge, now thats soul thats rockn roll!!...... nearly forgot bout the pixies!!!! Hey..... Been trying to meet you......So Appetite is the product of a moderate band, Uh NO! No soul. The point was Axls soul. Must have been the Gospel music he grow up singing. I agree John Fruscanti is the chili pepers secret sauce. Link to post Share on other sites
clashcityrocker 0 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 What do you guys think? Off topic...but its late and Im bored!Are you gaytarded?Noone gives a censored if you're tired, take this stupid censored to off-topic.This poll is gaytarded because The Clash are not included. Link to post Share on other sites
poguemahone68 0 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 The chilis really changed after the 3rd album. There's a couple of decent songs after that, but mostly filler.1. The Who (loved by mods and rockers)2. Rolling Stones (very close second, loved by mods and rockers as well)The rest don't belong on the listwell, maybe Zeppelin Link to post Share on other sites
poguemahone68 0 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 Guns and roses where a moderate band but they had no soul! Nirvana and the Chillis rules the early Nineties late eighties. Fusciante has none of his real teeth for christ sake heroin city!!! then uses that to write under the bridge, now thats soul thats rockn roll!!...... nearly forgot bout the pixies!!!! Hey..... Been trying to meet you......So Appetite is the product of a moderate band, Uh NO! No soul. The point was Axls soul. Must have been the Gospel music he grow up singing. I agree John Fruscanti is the chili pepers secret sauce.get some sleep avs, you are delirious Link to post Share on other sites
closetwin 0 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 No Frank Zappa?You're insane.CT Link to post Share on other sites
mbreon 0 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 1. The Beatles were a pop band.2. The Graefull dead are a jam band.3. Anyone who doesn't realize that The Who is the greatest rock band of all time is an idiot.The Beatles were a pop band....until 1967. Once Sgt. Pepper's came out, they lost that label. Sure many of their songs are short in nature and formed the same way, but this is a band with influences like Buddy Holly & The Crickets, so what do you expect. The Who is a great rock band, and one of my favorites....but not the greatest rock band of all-time. That has to be the Rolling Stones. The fact that Keith Richards is even still alive is a miracle of modern science. Of course I voted for Pink Floyd, but mainly because it is a personal preference. What I want to know is why Rush or Van Halen is even on this list, and if anybody in their right mind could possibly vote for them. Pink Floyd already covers the progressive rock era, so Rush is unnecessary, and Van Halen , is, well.....the `80s. No band from the `80s can win the greatest band of all-time award. Link to post Share on other sites
kennyg1966 0 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 What do you guys think? Off topic...but its late and Im bored!i like BOSTON Link to post Share on other sites
mbreon 0 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 What do you guys think? Off topic...but its late and Im bored!i like BOSTONI was fully expecting you to say Kenny G. Link to post Share on other sites
Limit Player 0 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 Interpol, The Smiths, The Cure, ...Screw these other sucky bands.Black Sabbath for the old bands, though. Link to post Share on other sites
clashcityrocker 0 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 Interpol, The Smiths, The Cure, ...Screw these other sucky bands.Black Sabbath for the old bands, though....Joy Division, Gang of Four. Granted Interpol are a great band, but can they be considered the greatest rock and roll band of all time after two albums? I like your choices very much though. Link to post Share on other sites
TheIceman05 0 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 1. The Beatles were a pop band.2. The Graefull dead are a jam band.3. Anyone who doesn't realize that The Who is the greatest rock band of all time is an idiot.Some people would suggest that your #3 is wrong, but that you are still a tragic hero.Led Zeppelin is the greatest rock-band of all time. They had "Cota" but the Stones had "The Eighties" and "The Nineties"The Who are the second greatest rock and roll band of all time, because Pete Townshend is the single greatest rock-badass throughout the annals of history.Ice Link to post Share on other sites
TheIceman05 0 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 Interpol, The Smiths, The Cure, ...Screw these other sucky bands.Black Sabbath for the old bands, though....Joy Division, Gang of Four. Granted Interpol are a great band, but can they be considered the greatest rock and roll band of all time after two albums? I like your choices very much though.1) Interpol is pretty sweet, but they're gonna need about 5 more great albums to even be in consideration, and their lead singer is going to have to learn to write lyrics that make sense. Comparing him with Morrissey is insane2) The Smiths and The Cure are awesome.3) Joy Division is awesome, but I've always had an intense and unfounded hatred of "Gang of Four"Ice Link to post Share on other sites
ahosang 0 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 I voted for the Floyd. I prefer the old stuff of course. I go past Battersea power station almost every day and am always reminded of them(but that's NOT why I like them - lol). Most old rockers would say the Stones or the Who. Link to post Share on other sites
greatwhite 0 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 ACDC 8) Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now