Landon_McFly 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 You know you won't win the WSOP when you do this...Shawn Sheikhan was all in pre-flop with pocket [Q]'s and was called by Mike Matusow who turned up [7][2]. The flop came [A♥][A♦][5♣][8♥][8♣] no help for Matusow. Shekhan doubled up.Mike sucks at life, and it's starting to show in his poker game also. Link to post Share on other sites
clashcityrocker 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 You know you won't win the WSOP when you do this...Shawn Sheikhan was all in pre-flop with pocket [Q]'s and was called by Mike Matusow who turned up [7][2]. The flop came [A♥][A♦][5♣][8♥][8♣] no help for Matusow. Shekhan doubled up.Mike sucks at life, and it's starting to show in his poker game also.I'm guessing that he raised trying to steal, got re-raised all in, pot odds. Link to post Share on other sites
chester97 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 You know you won't win the WSOP when you do this...Shawn Sheikhan was all in pre-flop with pocket [Q]'s and was called by Mike Matusow who turned up [7][2]. The flop came [A♥][A♦][5♣][8♥][8♣] no help for Matusow. Shekhan doubled up.Mike sucks at life, and it's starting to show in his poker game also.what kind of life do you lead that allows you to say he sucks at life? you makin minimum 300K in the next two days?go away Link to post Share on other sites
Landon_McFly 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Author Share Posted July 14, 2005 I'm guessing that he raised trying to steal, got re-raised all in, pot odds.Damn, didn't even think about that...and that's why I'm not a professional poker player Link to post Share on other sites
Acesgotcracked 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Go to hell and get the facts. He raise on a steal, the blinds are at 20-40 g's so he probably raised to 120-140. The update said the other guy only doubled up to 400 meaning he had less than 200 to start the hand since theres 45 in antes in there, the 20 of the SB and 40 of the BBMatusows-120BB-40Antes-45SB-20This alone actually makes it so that Cardplayers math makes no sense but anyways it is clear that Matusow didn't have to call much more than a wooden nickle to stay in the hand, getting more than correct odds to call. So now that you look foolish.Your clearly jealous of Matusow and. Yeah he blew most of the money that he won in 1999-2002 but I bet he had more fun than you have ever had in your whole life doing it. He lives a lifestyle where he gets ot play poker all day and freewheels around Vegas or wheever he happens to be gambling it up at any given time. Hes doing what he loves to do, gambling for a living. Link to post Share on other sites
chester97 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Go to hell and get the facts. He raise on a steal, the blinds are at 20-40 g's so he probably raised to 120-140. The update said the other guy only doubled up to 400 meaning he had less than 200 to start the hand since theres 45 in antes in there, the 20 of the SB and 40 of the BBMatusows-120BB-40Antes-45SB-20This alone actually makes it so that Cardplayers math makes no sense but anyways it is clear that Matusow didn't have to call much more than a wooden nickle to stay in the hand, getting more than correct odds to call. So now that you look foolish.Your clearly jealous of Matusow and. Yeah he blew most of the money that he won in 1999-2002 but I bet he had more fun than you have ever had in your whole life doing it. He lives a lifestyle where he gets ot play poker all day and freewheels around Vegas or wheever he happens to be gambling it up at any given time. Hes doing what he loves to do, gambling for a living.all you have to say is "go away". well done though Link to post Share on other sites
greatwhite 0 Posted July 15, 2005 Share Posted July 15, 2005 Cardplayer makes a mistake on every post. Watch we'll go back and find out Raymer is really the chip leader. Link to post Share on other sites
Landon_McFly 0 Posted July 15, 2005 Author Share Posted July 15, 2005 Jeez, I was being sarcastic you homos. :shock: Link to post Share on other sites
chester97 0 Posted July 15, 2005 Share Posted July 15, 2005 Jeez, I was being sarcastic you homos. :shock:no you weren't. you were being serious, you got challenged on it, and then you backed away. Link to post Share on other sites
kad 0 Posted July 15, 2005 Share Posted July 15, 2005 If he doesnt make the final table, the prize money might only just cover the debts he has racked up.. Link to post Share on other sites
fuzznucket 0 Posted July 15, 2005 Share Posted July 15, 2005 Good point. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now