SuM827 0 Posted July 11, 2005 Share Posted July 11, 2005 Mike Matusow is having a pretty awesome day. Over 100k now. I'm pulling for a Matusow final table appearance. Link to post Share on other sites
avsfan 0 Posted July 11, 2005 Share Posted July 11, 2005 Goooo Mike!!! :twisted: Link to post Share on other sites
scorps1973 0 Posted July 11, 2005 Share Posted July 11, 2005 Yes, a class act like Mike is good for the game of poker. Link to post Share on other sites
jojo 0 Posted July 11, 2005 Share Posted July 11, 2005 blibberdy blabbedy,blibberdy blabbedy Link to post Share on other sites
crowTrobot 2 Posted July 11, 2005 Share Posted July 11, 2005 100k in dedonkified chips, wow Link to post Share on other sites
Bluffs2005 0 Posted July 11, 2005 Share Posted July 11, 2005 Three cheers for the largest donkey of them all.........Mike Matusow!!!! Link to post Share on other sites
SuM827 0 Posted July 11, 2005 Author Share Posted July 11, 2005 Mike is the man. And he's actually a pretty cool guy too. Link to post Share on other sites
mark33f 0 Posted July 11, 2005 Share Posted July 11, 2005 Yes, a class act like Mike is good for the game of poker.Actually, a guy like Mike would attract more people to poker and thus increase overall fish population. Link to post Share on other sites
SuM827 0 Posted July 11, 2005 Author Share Posted July 11, 2005 Raymer vs Matusow part 2? Link to post Share on other sites
scorps1973 0 Posted July 11, 2005 Share Posted July 11, 2005 Yes, a class act like Mike is good for the game of poker.Actually, a guy like Mike would attract more people to poker and thus increase overall fish population.I think amateurs (underdogs) winning the WSOP attract more fish, Mike would just attract more people like him. I think we have enough loud mouths, don't you? Link to post Share on other sites
zimmer4141 0 Posted July 11, 2005 Share Posted July 11, 2005 I don't think there will be more loud mouths if Matusow wins. People will just get an extended chance to see how annoying he is. Link to post Share on other sites
Mattnxtc 0 Posted July 11, 2005 Share Posted July 11, 2005 speakin of loud mouths..hows arieh doing? haha j/k...hes one of my favorite players..especially since hes on bodog... Link to post Share on other sites
Pupsta 0 Posted July 11, 2005 Share Posted July 11, 2005 Yes, a class act like Mike is good for the game of poker.Actually, a guy like Mike would attract more people to poker and thus increase overall fish population.I think amateurs (underdogs) winning the WSOP attract more fish, Mike would just attract more people like him. I think we have enough loud mouths, don't you?no. the only thing more enjoyable at the poker table than winning is seeing the loudmouth lose. i love loudmouths at my table...they're generally the ones giving me their money because they try to play big to back up their words, but they can't play for shit. Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted July 11, 2005 Share Posted July 11, 2005 Yes, a class act like Mike is good for the game of poker.Is anyone else tired of the comment "good for poker"?I'm sick of know-nothing pansies who've played on the internet for 2 years and gone to a card room 5 times in their lives complaing about "what's good for poker".Matusow is good for poker. He's entertaining. He's brash. The American population like that. They don't want to watch a bunch of nice polite people playing cards.If anything he increases the popularity of poker. Link to post Share on other sites
scorps1973 0 Posted July 11, 2005 Share Posted July 11, 2005 Yes, a class act like Mike is good for the game of poker.Actually, a guy like Mike would attract more people to poker and thus increase overall fish population.I think amateurs (underdogs) winning the WSOP attract more fish, Mike would just attract more people like him. I think we have enough loud mouths, don't you?no. the only thing more enjoyable at the poker table than winning is seeing the loudmouth lose. i love loudmouths at my table...they're generally the ones giving me their money because they try to play big to back up their words, but they can't play for shit.I do agree, watching loudmouths lose is somehow theraputic.... Link to post Share on other sites
scorps1973 0 Posted July 11, 2005 Share Posted July 11, 2005 Yes, a class act like Mike is good for the game of poker.Is anyone else tired of the comment "good for poker"?I'm sick of know-nothing pansies who've played on the internet for 2 years and gone to a card room 5 times in their lives complaing about "what's good for poker".Matusow is good for poker. He's entertaining. He's brash. The American population like that. They don't want to watch a bunch of nice polite people playing cards.If anything he increases the popularity of poker.I don't take issue with people being entertaining or brash, what bothers me is loud, rude, irritating and obnoxious. By the way was it the cutoff for being allowed to talk about what's good for poker? How many times do you to go to a card room to be an expert on that? I know I'm not there yet but I would like to have something to shoot for. Link to post Share on other sites
Coocoo 0 Posted July 11, 2005 Share Posted July 11, 2005 Matusow is hilarious, maybe it would be annoying if I was at his table...but as is hes just a funny-ass donkey! Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now