cdddc75 0 Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 I can follow along.Then explain these concepts, because I don't think you can.That takes effort.If I wanted to put forth effort, I would've wrote something wittier than "This thread sucks". Link to post Share on other sites
otnemem 0 Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 I can follow along.Then explain these concepts, because I don't think you can.That takes effort.If I wanted to put forth effort, I would've wrote something wittier than "This thread sucks".In other words, you don't understand what I'm trying to say. Link to post Share on other sites
ajs510 122 Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 Taking into consideration that Google has never heard of the word "tectronic" I'm constitutionally obligated to call bullshits/wUnless we're talking about earthquakes big enough to swallow Vegas, in which case I can't say anything further... Link to post Share on other sites
otnemem 0 Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 Taking into consideration that Google has never heard of the word "tectronic" I'm constitutionally obligated to call censoreds/wUnless we're talking about earthquakes big enough to swallow Vegas, in which case I can't say anything further...The fact that this forum has a "sarcasm warning" is pretty pathetic. If you can't understand sarcasm when reading it, you've gotta be pretty slow, or unfunny.Taking this into consideration, I'll shut up now, as I'm realizing that perhaps I've reached maximum capacity with the FCP crowd. Back to the 2+2 Theory section, where people speak my language. Link to post Share on other sites
ajs510 122 Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 Taking into consideration that Google has never heard of the word "tectronic" I'm constitutionally obligated to call censoreds/wUnless we're talking about earthquakes big enough to swallow Vegas, in which case I can't say anything further...The fact that this forum has a "sarcasm warning" is pretty pathetic. If you can't understand sarcasm when reading it, you've gotta be pretty slow, or unfunny.Taking this into consideration, I'll shut up now, as I'm realizing that perhaps I've reached maximum capacity with the FCP crowd. Back to the 2+2 Theory section, where people speak my language.The fact that you can't take a joke or tolerate humor of any kind should be reason enough to go back to 2+2. Have fun with all the humorless snobs over there who think the only math involved in this game is this simple equation:Poker = LifeSeriously, you're telling people to grow up in an environment where people discuss daily whether or not the Krablar is magical, lighten up and have fun (remember fun?)... Link to post Share on other sites
Shan027 0 Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 The solution to each equation equals BG's tectronic equilibrium. The higher his TE, the better off he is against Daniel.Please define "tectronic equilibrium," citing published sources.Bet, Babe. Slide me a piece of tha porta . . . drinside run tha java. Link to post Share on other sites
Waffles2003 1 Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 Date / Time: 2005-06-14 15:56:00Title: Negreanu is outLog: Daniel Negreanu bust out of the tournament. Word is that he is headed over to the Wynn to continue his battle with Barry Greenstein in heads up 7 card stud. Link to post Share on other sites
otnemem 0 Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 Date / Time: 2005-06-14 15:56:00Title: Negreanu is outLog: Daniel Negreanu bust out of the tournament. Word is that he is headed over to the Wynn to continue his battle with Barry Greenstein in heads up 7 card stud.Hmm. I'm inclined to say that DN's variables summation is rising by the hour during this WSOP month... Good thing for BG. Link to post Share on other sites
cdddc75 0 Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 Date / Time: 2005-06-14 15:56:00Title: Negreanu is outLog: Daniel Negreanu bust out of the tournament. Word is that he is headed over to the Wynn to continue his battle with Barry Greenstein in heads up 7 card stud.Sure would be nice if there was a thread about this 7 card stud match... Link to post Share on other sites
garamond10pt 0 Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 Sure would be nice if there was a thread about this 7 card stud match...I heard the thread can't come back to the US until it can pay off its million dollar debt. Link to post Share on other sites
Sundevils21 0 Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 Daniel vs. Barry challenge match #5 *part 2* will begin at 5:00.http://www.fullcontactpoker.com/poker-foru...pic.php?t=16415-Travis Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now